Future Conditions. A. If the City’s voters approve annexation into the District, full title to the Premises and the Joint Reserve Fund will be transferred to the District at no cost to the District, provided, that the District will be responsible to the City for any outstanding Bonds issued by the City under Paragraph 6 herein which shall become due in full to the City no later than (1) the final maturity of the Bonds, or (2) six years, whichever is sooner. The District shall make required payments under this section annually, at least sixty days in advance of any required payments from the City to its bondholders beginning the year in which the District first collects taxes from City residents.
Future Conditions. The District and the City may, at some future date, desire sewer service to be extended to other areas not currently served under all the conditions of this contract. Such sewer service located in the City’s service area shall be deemed an extension of the City’s sewage collection system. Said extension shall be accomplished under the direction of the City and be subject to review and approval by the City in accordance with the City’s current published standards in effect at the time of the extension. Such sewer service located in the District’s service area shall be deemed an extension of the District’s sewage collection system and shall be subject to the review and approval by the City to ensure the City has adequate capacity to accept and convey this sewage to the King County sewer interceptor. The District and the City agree that they will work together in connection with servicing such areas should the same be requested; PROVIDED, however, that the City reserves the right to condition acceptance of such sewage discharge from this area upon the same terms and conditions expressed in subparagraphs (1) above.
Future Conditions. Based on the projected growth for the Port facilities, the two planning horizon years were forecasted for the PM peak hours for both the No-Build and Build conditions. While the airport terminal has a peak during the midday, the PM peak hour was selected due to the fact that the existing traffic count data indicated that the this period has the highest level of traffic activity at intersections (which would indicate the worst traffic conditions) in comparison to the midday or AM peak hour.2 Mitigation Criteria Mitigation measures or facility improvements will be identified where future conditions do not meet the identified performance measures set forth by the City of Portland and the Oregon Department of Transportation for intersection operations. In situations where the facility is not meeting the established performance standards under No Build conditions, the facility will be mitigated if it has a significant impact under Build conditions based on an additional 10 seconds of delay and/or an increase of 0.05 V/C ratio or more beyond No Build conditions. In these cases, the improvements will try to mitigate the significant impacts, at a minimum.
Future Conditions. The consultant shall work with data from the Rapid City MPO’s traffic model to project Future (2045) traffic conditions for multiple conceptual scenarios: no-build and build. The consultant shall provide peak season and Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) volume projections including morning and evening peaks, movements and directions, design hourly volumes (DHV), peak hour factor (PHF) and traffic composition (i.e., passenger cars, trucks, buses, or recreational vehicles).
Future Conditions. The consultant will analyze future traffic conditions. All analyses shall be conducted using the current edition of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) for the current year of 2018.
Future Conditions. Develop Year 2035 traffic volume forecasts for the no-build scenario along Xxxxxxx Boulevard and subdivision roadways. It is anticipated that subdivision traffic would experience little or no growth into the future with the no-build scenario, but Xxxxxxx Boulevard traffic volumes would grow with regional development. The Rapid City Area Long Range Transportation Plan and regional travel demand model would be consulted to develop future forecasts. • Develop Year 2035 traffic volume forecasts for up to 3 build alternatives. Chapel Lane traffic would grow with development that would likely follow construction of an alternate connection, so forecasts would be based on anticipated new development. Traffic generated by new development would be estimated based on information included inTrip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 6th Edition, 2003).
Future Conditions. Analyze intersection traffic operations based on future traffic volume forecasts. Use methodology contained in the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 to calculate a Level of Service (LOS) for each movement at the Xxxxxxx Boulevard / Chapel Lane intersection. • Based on Year 2035 build scenario traffic volumes, analyze LOS for the Xxxxxxx Boulevard / Chapel Lane intersection with an alternate connection built. Analyze LOS of any alternate connection intersections.
Future Conditions. Future (2035) traffic information shall be developed for multiple scenarios: no- build and build. The consultant shall provide peak season and Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) volume projections including morning and evening peaks, movements and directions, design hourly volumes (DHV), peak hour factor (PHF) and traffic composition (i.e., passenger cars, trucks, buses, or recreational vehicles).
Future Conditions. The consultant will analyze for future traffic conditions. All analyses shall be conducted using the methodology of the Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual 2010.
Future Conditions. The inspection shall cover only current conditions visible and accessible at the time of the inspection. It shall not cover latent conditions not visible or revealed by minor probing and sounding. Minor probing and sounding is generally limited to the large structural wood members within the areas inspected. The inspector nor their firm shall in no way be held responsible for future infestations, damages or conditions that were not visible at the date of the inspection. It is a “snap shot” in time and does not constitute a warranty of any nature and should not be construed as one. NOTE: There are certain wood destroying insects that go dormant during certain times of the year and may not be visible during the inspection due to their seasonal activity cycles. Therefore, neither the Inspector nor their firm will be responsible for infestations that may not be visible on the date of the inspection due to seasonal activity cycles of certain insects.
