Force Majeure: Events Not Covered by Adaptive Management Trigger Decision-Making Processes Sample Clauses

Force Majeure: Events Not Covered by Adaptive Management Trigger Decision-Making Processes. The foregoing Adaptive Management Trigger Decision-Making Process addresses foreseeable events and changing circumstances that interfere with the Program’s implementation of Project Implementation Actions. In the event that a catastrophic disruption occurs that renders one or more Project Implementation Actions impossible (e.g., due to destruction of essential infrastructure, or catastrophic loss of habitat that would extend beyond two five-year reporting cycles), the Program will notify the State Water Board in writing of the impossibility and propose a timeline to resume Project Implementation Actions. Alternatively, the Program may inform the State Water Board that the delivery of the Public Water Quality Benefit is no longer possible. After the Program has stabilized any health or human safety-related impacts of the unforeseen circumstance, the Decision-Making Body will meet and confer and decide one of the following: 1. The Decision-Making Body may mutually agree that the Public Water Quality Benefit continues to be possible. The Decision-Making Body will determine whether an adjustment to the Adaptive Management Plan is needed; an adjustment to the Performance Threshold is needed; or an alternative Public Water Quality Benefit can be achieved. Accordingly, the Department will process an amendment and inform the CWC of any benefit changes. See Contract Section 8.6, Funding Agreement paragraph 17. a. Should the Decision-Making Body not agree on whether an adjustment to the Adaptive Management Plan or an adjustment to the Performance Threshold is needed, the State Water Board may initiate the Public Benefit Dispute Process. See Contract Section 5. 2. The Decision-Making Body may mutually agree that the Public Water Quality Benefit is no longer possible due to the catastrophic disruption addressed by this section, and may mutually agree to terminate the Project Implementation Actions. Accordingly, the State Water Board will process an amendment and inform the CWC of the changes. See Contract
View Source

Related to Force Majeure: Events Not Covered by Adaptive Management Trigger Decision-Making Processes

  • Reporting of Non-Force Majeure Events Each Party (the “Notifying Party”) shall notify the other Parties when the Notifying Party becomes aware of its inability to comply with the provisions of this Agreement for a reason other than a Force Majeure event. The Parties agree to cooperate with each other and provide necessary information regarding such inability to comply, including the date, duration, reason for the inability to comply, and corrective actions taken or planned to be taken with respect to such inability to comply. Notwithstanding the foregoing, notification, cooperation or information provided under this Article shall not entitle the Party receiving such notification to allege a cause for anticipatory breach of this Agreement.

  • Termination Notice for Force Majeure Event 21.7.1 If a Force Majeure Event subsists for a period of 60 (sixty) days or more within a continuous period of 120 (one hundred and twenty) days, either Party may in its discretion terminate this Agreement by issuing a Termination Notice to the other Party without being liable in any manner whatsoever, save as provided in this Article 21, and upon issue of such Termination Notice, this Agreement shall, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, stand terminated forthwith; provided that before issuing such Termination Notice, the Party intending to issue the Termination Notice shall inform the other Party of such intention and grant 15 (fifteen) days time to make a representation, and may after the expiry of such 15 (fifteen) days period, whether or not it is in receipt of such representation, in its sole discretion issue the Termination Notice.

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK

  • Reasonable Suspicion Testing All Employees Performing Safety-Sensitive Functions A. Reasonable suspicion testing for alcohol or controlled substances may be directed by the Employer for any employee performing safety-sensitive functions when there is reason to suspect that alcohol or controlled substance use may be adversely affecting the employee’s job performance or that the employee may present a danger to the physical safety of the employee or another. B. Specific objective grounds must be stated in writing that support the reasonable suspicion. Examples of specific objective grounds include but are not limited to: 1. Physical symptoms consistent with alcohol and/or controlled substance use; 2. Evidence or observation of alcohol or controlled substance use, possession, sale, or delivery; or 3. The occurrence of an accident(s) where a trained manager, supervisor or lead worker suspects alcohol or other controlled substance use may have been a factor.

  • Termination for continuing Force Majeure Event Either Party may, by written notice to the other, terminate this Framework Agreement if a Force Majeure Event endures for a continuous period of more than one hundred and twenty (120) Working Days.