Common use of Flynote Clause in Contracts

Flynote. The Law - tenancy agreement - whether it existed as between the parties - question of wrongful detention of he respondents' good award of damages. The appellants entered into an agreement with the respondents in 1996 following which the respondents occupied an office owned by the appellants at a rental of K120,000 per month and a further amount of K3,000 for security. The 1st appellant gave to the respondent a receipt dated 11th November,1996, for rent and security fees for the months November ,1996, December, 1996 and January,1997. On 17th May ,1997, the appellants locked the office for non-payment of rent and detained the respondents goods. It was argued by Counsel for the appellant that the respondent was merely a licensee. Whilst Counsel for the respondent argued that there was a verbal tenancy agreement.