Flynote Sample Clauses
A Flynote is a brief summary or annotation that outlines the key points or legal principles addressed in a document, typically found at the beginning of legal judgments or case reports. It highlights the main issues, relevant facts, and the outcome, providing readers with a quick reference to the substance of the case without reading the full text. The core function of a Flynote is to facilitate efficient legal research and understanding by summarizing complex information into an accessible format.
Flynote. Contract - Agreement to renovate Company Law - Body Corporate - Representation of The respondent was renting two adjoining plots in Kitwe from the appellant. With the consent and agreement of the appellant’s Managing Director of the day, the respondent constructed a block of offices and a machine shop. The building plans were processed with the City Council through the then Managing Director. The respondent sued to recover K19 Million the cost of the buildings, pursuant to the agreement and successfully applied for summary judgment. The appellants sought to resist the claim by alleging - through its new Managing Director - that there was no such agreement; that the buildings were illegal; and that the value was not as claimed. The appellants claims were made despite documentary evidence which showed that the previous management had indeed agreed as alleged by the respondent and that a valuation had been done. At the time of hearing the appeal, the appellant was still collecting money from the tenants in those renovated offices. The issue of whether a body corporate could act “in person” also arose.
Flynote. The Law - tenancy agreement - whether it existed as between the parties - question of wrongful detention of he respondents' good award of damages. The appellants entered into an agreement with the respondents in 1996 following which the respondents occupied an office owned by the appellants at a rental of K120,000 per month and a further amount of K3,000 for security. The 1st appellant gave to the respondent a receipt dated 11th November,1996, for rent and security fees for the months November ,1996, December, 1996 and January,1997. On 17th May ,1997, the appellants locked the office for non-payment of rent and detained the respondents goods. It was argued by Counsel for the appellant that the respondent was merely a licensee. Whilst Counsel for the respondent argued that there was a verbal tenancy agreement.