First Methodology Sample Clauses

First Methodology. The first methodology relies on the factors listed above, or some subset thereof', as a means for measuring the equities, benefits, and detriments of consolidation. See, e.g.,
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
First Methodology. Using this methodology, the Minimum Obligated Amount will be based solely upon the Threshold Price applicable to the Draw Down Pricing Period, as determined using the following table (which Threshold Price shall be adjusted accordingly in the event of any Reverse Split): Minimum Obligated Amount Based on First Methodology Threshold Price Range Minimum Obligated Amount Equal to or greater than $6.00 $ 7,250,000 Equal to or greater than $5.00 but less than $6.00 $ 6,500,000 Equal to or greater than $4.00 but less than $5.00 $ 4,250,000 Equal to or greater than $3.00 but less than $4.00 $ 3,500,000 Equal to or greater than $2.00 but less than $3.00 $ 2,750,000 Equal to or greater than $1.25 but less than $2.00 $ 2,000,000 Equal to or greater than $0.75 but less than $1.25 $ 1,350,000 Equal to or greater than $0.50 but less than $0.75 $ 1,000,000 Equal to or greater than $0.25 but less than $0.50 $ 500,000 Equal to or greater than $0.20 but less than $0.25 $ 350,000

Related to First Methodology

  • Payment Methodology The Contractor shall be compensated based on the Service Rates in Attachment for units of service authorized by the Institution in a total amount not to exceed the Contract Maximum Liability established in Section C.1. The Contractor’s compensation shall be contingent upon the satisfactory completion of units of service or project milestones identified in Attachment B. The Contractor shall submit invoices, in form and substance acceptable to the Institution with all of the necessary supporting documentation, prior to any payment. Such invoices shall be submitted for completed units of service or project milestones for the amount stipulated.

  • First Method and Market Quotation If the First Method and Market Quotation apply, the Defaulting Party will pay to the Non-defaulting Party the excess, if a positive number, of (A) the sum of the Settlement Amount (determined by the Non-defaulting Party) in respect of the Terminated Transactions and the Termination Currency Equivalent of the Unpaid Amounts owing to the Non-defaulting Party over (B) the Termination Currency Equivalent of the Unpaid Amounts owing to the Defaulting Party.

  • Test method 3.3.1. The method used shall be that described in Annex 3, paragraph 3.1.

  • Methodology 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver.

  • Measurement method An isolation resistance test instrument is connected between the live parts and the electrical chassis. The isolation resistance is subsequently measured by applying a DC voltage at least half of the working voltage of the high voltage bus. If the system has several voltage ranges (e.g. because of boost converter) in conductively connected circuit and some of the components cannot withstand the working voltage of the entire circuit, the isolation resistance between those components and the electrical chassis can be measured separately by applying at least half of their own working voltage with those components disconnected.

  • Service Providing Methodology 1.3.1 Party A and Party B agree that during the term of this Agreement, where necessary, Party B may enter into further service agreements with Party A or any other party designated by Party A, which shall provide the specific contents, manner, personnel, and fees for the specific services.

  • First Method and Loss If the First Method and Loss apply, the Defaulting Party will pay to the Non-defaulting Party, if a positive number, the Non-defaulting Party's Loss in respect of this Agreement.

  • Underwriting Methodology The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Mortgage Loan employs objective mathematical principles which relate the related Mortgagor's income, assets and liabilities to the proposed payment and such underwriting methodology does not rely on the extent of the related Mortgagor's equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such credit extension. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the related Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan;

  • Procurement Method (a) Quality-Based Selection (b) Selection under a Fixed Budget

  • Second Method and Market Quotation If the Second Method and Market Quotation apply, an amount will be payable equal to (A) the sum of the Settlement Amount (determined by the Non-defaulting Party) in respect of the Terminated Transactions and the Termination Currency Equivalent of the Unpaid Amounts owing to the Non-defaulting Party less (B) the Termination Currency Equivalent of the Unpaid Amounts owing to the Defaulting Party. If that amount is a positive number, the Defaulting Party will pay it to the Non-defaulting Party; if it is a negative number, the Non-defaulting Party will pay the absolute value of that amount to the Defaulting Party.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.