Evaluation Processes Clause Samples
The Evaluation Processes clause defines the procedures and criteria by which a party's performance, deliverables, or compliance will be assessed under the agreement. Typically, this clause outlines the methods for conducting evaluations, such as periodic reviews, audits, or performance metrics, and may specify who is responsible for carrying out the assessments and how results are communicated. Its core practical function is to ensure transparency and accountability by establishing clear standards and processes for measuring whether contractual obligations are being met.
Evaluation Processes. The Employer and LSSA agree that evaluation processes should be consistent across the program. The Labor-Management Committee will develop a proposal to the Executive Director by July 1, 2015 to enhance the staff and management evaluation processes. The proposal shall address, among other things, timelines, forms, communication, and meaningful staff input and will be submitted to the Executive Director by July 1, 2015. The employer will make their best effort to implement the enhanced process by October 1, 2015.
Evaluation Processes. 5.4.4.1 Unit members who have completed an initial one-year probationary period satisfactorily shall have a performance evaluation every two (2) years prior to their anniversary date. The evaluation has as a major goal the improvement of services in support of the educational program. If performance deteriorates before the two-year anniversary date, a special evaluation may be conducted.
5.4.4.2 The purpose of the performance evaluation is to reflect the unit member’s proficiency in the job; promote self-improvement; develop leadership; assist unit members to meet full potential; identify the areas in which the individual is performing satisfactorily, as well as the areas where improvement is desirable; identify department goals and objectives; establish goals and objectives for the supervisor for the ensuing year; determine how well the pre-established goals and objectives were met; and meet legal requirements.
5.4.4.3 Probationary unit members shall be rated three (3) times in the first year of employment, usually at the end of the fourth, eighth, and eleventh month of employment. The final rating will carry a recommendation regarding status for the supervisory employee.
5.4.4.4 Any evaluation that is less than satisfactory shall include a written explanation of the reasons for such a rating. The immediate manager shall meet with the unit member to discuss specific performance problems and make written recommendations for improvement. The unit member shall have the right to respond in writing and to attach that response to the evaluation.
5.4.4.5 One copy of the evaluation will be given to the unit member; another will be placed in the unit member’s permanent personnel records.
5.4.4.6 A permanent unit member who disagrees with his/her performance evaluation may appeal such evaluation in writing to the VPA/site administrator within fifteen (15) days of date of review.
5.4.4.7 The process used for the evaluation of a unit member is subject to the grievance procedure. However, the standards employed and the judgments rendered, while subject to the appeals process mentioned above, are not subject to the grievance procedure.
5.4.4.8 The contents of all documents shall remain confidential, except as requested by law and prudent employment practices.
Evaluation Processes. When a probationary faculty member is employed after an academic year begins and for more than 75% of the days in the academic year, a unique evaluation timeline for the first year will be developed by the evaluation team for that faculty member, as applicable to the assignment.
Evaluation Processes. Prop A Programs are subject to significant data reporting requirements in order to receive additional incentive funding. Staff use this data to monitor and evaluate program efficacy and to appropriate wise expenditure of Prop A funding. Public Transit programs generally promote positive environmental outcomes by reducing traffic flow and emissions. The City’s services also promote the ability of seniors and people with disabilities to remain independent and to access other needed services. Continued funding to these programs will improve environmental and health outcomes. Social Services/Transit staff engages with the public on a regular basis by attending meetings, conducting workshops and riding transit services to promote the City’s programs and gather feedback. HUMAN SERVICES & RENT STABILIZATION DEPARTMENT / SOCIAL SERVICES DIVISION This item will reduce the General Fund reserves committed for Proposition A trades by $840,000 and will increase the General Fund expenditures by $840,000 in account 100- 1-03-31-531016 established for Prop A Fund Trades. $840,000 Funding for this item is already budgeted.
Evaluation Processes