Evaluation Objectives. The evaluation of unit members is directed to the following objectives:
Evaluation Objectives. Prior to the first evaluation in an academic year, non-tenured faculty members shall be apprised of the objectives, methods and materials being used in the formal observation and evaluation of the faculty member’s performance.
Evaluation Objectives. The objectives of the evaluation are:
Evaluation Objectives. The evaluation process provides information to the regular faculty member being evaluated, hereinafter called the evaluee, and to the district about performance in the four (4) major categories of the regular faculty job description: student contact-related duties, district/department service, professional development and other required job duties. These are described in the regular faculty job description as appropriate for the employment category. (See Article 17: Job Descriptions.)
Evaluation Objectives. The primary purpose of teacher evaluations shall be to improve the effectiveness of a teacher in the performance of the teacher’s professional duties.
Evaluation Objectives. The purpose of this evaluation procedure is:
Evaluation Objectives. The primary purpose of ancillary staff evaluations shall be to improve the effectiveness of an ancillary staff in the performance of the ancillary staff’s professional duties.
Evaluation Objectives. 1) To provide teachers with a continuous process of evaluation and professional growth.
Evaluation Objectives. The objectives of the evaluation, as set out in the terms of reference, are to analyse the organisation of SOLVIT and its achievements to date, and to evaluate its relevance, efficiency and effectiveness. The results of this analysis will support the provision of a set of conclusions for the further reinforcement of SOLVIT. The key evaluation questions are set out in the terms of reference and address the following points: • Relevance – whether SOLVIT network addresses a real and existing need and whether it is the best way of meeting this need. In this context, the specific mandate of SOLVIT and its relationship to other problem-solving tools is also considered; 1 The EFTA / EEA countries were not included in the scope of this evaluation • Effective operation and organisation of SOLVIT – assessed both in quantitative and qualitative terms and the level of satisfaction of stakeholders (clients, SOLVIT centres, public authorities, Commission);
Evaluation Objectives. This evaluation will take a qualitative approach, supplemented with quantitative data collected from reports by local partners, aiming to: Assess the impact of the IVWD project to date in four main areas of intervention namely: inclusive education (IE) for children with disabilities, vocational training and employment (VTE) for youth with disabilities, policy advocacy supporting the inclusion of PWD in all facets of life, especially in education and employment; and information technology training at the technical college level. In addition to considering each of the four Strategic Objectives separately, the evaluation should assess the combined impact of the comprehensive model of educational and employment support for people with disabilities from the preschool level through higher education, vocational training and employment. The evaluation should also examine linkages among project components and across national, provincial and local levels of the education system to provide systematic and cross- sectoral support to PWD. Assess the level of sustainability that the IVWD project has achieved by eliciting information from local partners regarding their action plans to continue support for inclusion of PWD. Sustainability can also be measured by the level of impact of inclusive practices supported by the IVWD project on Vietnamese Government policy and practice, both at the national and local levels. Analyze the strengths and shortcomings of the comprehensive model of support as designed as well as practical issues in implementation and how they were overcome. Identify remaining gaps in supporting inclusion of PWD. either by strengthening support services already provided through the IVWD project or through new activities. Give specific recommendations for future interventions. Data and methodology requirements The evaluation team is expected to develop an evaluation plan including evaluation tools and send to CRS for comments before field data collection. Quantitative data related to key indicators can be found in the database built up from the project M&E system (which has been used in bi-annual and quarterly reports to USAID). This database will be provided to the team for reviewing if additional statistics are required. In case more quantitative data is needed, forms for data collection should be developed by the team and then sent out to local partners by IVWD project staff in advance. (House-to-house identification and screening of PWD as was conduct...
