Evaluation Instruments. The forms used by the teacher’s evaluator. The approved evaluation instruments are attached to this agreement.
Evaluation Instruments. 6.2.1 The evaluation instruments shall contain the following Employer generated forms:
Evaluation Instruments. The following evaluation instruments shall be used in the teacher evaluation process. These instruments shall be contained in the appendices of this Agreement, and may be modified by mutual agreement of the Joint Evaluation Committee. Form 1: Ohio Department of Education (ODE) Self-Assessment Summary Form Form 2: ODE Professional Growth Plan Form Form 3: ODE Improvement Plan Form 4: ODE Assessment of Teacher Performance Evaluation Rubric Form 5: ODE Pre-and Post- Conference Questions Form 6: ODE Post Conference Planning Form 7: ODE Combining Student Growth Measure Form Form 8: Walkthrough Form Form 9: Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Template Form 10: Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Calibration Form Form 11: Speech-Language Pathologist Performance Evaluation Rubric Form 12: Final Summative Rating
Evaluation Instruments. Performance evaluations for instructors, both certified and non-certified shall be conducted using the document specified by the IEI model.
Evaluation Instruments. The CCPS and the Association Evaluation Committee will continue to jointly review the observation and evaluation instruments and make recommendations for revisions based on any regulatory or guidance changes. Every effort will be made to develop observation and evaluation instruments which are mutually agreed upon by both parties. CCPS will provide a copy of the CCPS Teacher Evaluation Process timeline to the Association on or before September 15.
Evaluation Instruments. Forms used in the OTES evaluation procedure will be those provided by ODE. The walkthrough form used will be as attached in Exhibit G. The Evaluation Committee shall consider and recommend updates to evaluation forms each school year.
Evaluation Instruments. The evaluation instruments, as attached, will be utilized to complete the evaluation process. Such forms are in compliance with the OTES and OSCES models.
Evaluation Instruments. Evaluation instruments will not change except under the provision stated in Section 14.1.
Evaluation Instruments a. The evaluation instruments and forms required to be used as part of the evaluation plan contained in this article are located on the District network or another location agreed to by the Joint Evaluation Committee.
Evaluation Instruments. The comprehensive evaluation of faculty will utilize the Faculty Appraisal Guide with forms, that is referenced in Appendix II of this Agreement, and the procedures delineated herein. A link for accessing the Faculty Appraisal Guide shall be posted on the websites of each of the colleges and the District for access by faculty and administrators. Faculty will be evaluated using the same evaluation instruments whether they teach in the classroom, online, or by using a combination of both instructional modes. Faculty not covered by one of these forms and/or guides may suggest modifications of the most suitable form, to be approved by the appropriate manager and the Guild. This process may be initiated by either the evaluee or any of the evaluation committee members. All tenured/tenure-track faculty members will be required to acknowledge on their evaluation form at the time of signing the summary report that they have participated in the assessment of student learning outcomes and discussions with colleagues stating how they use the results of the assessments to improve student learning by checking all applicable boxes below: 🞎 Efforts to incorporate teaching and learning practices and curriculum which reflect diversity, equity, inclusion, accessibility, anti-racism, and respect for the diverse backgrounds of students and colleagues; 🞎 Discussion of outcomes assessment with colleagues at department meetings; 🞎 Revisions to syllabi; 🞎 Revisions to course outlines based upon assessment of learning; 🞎 Revisions to curriculum based upon assessment of learning; 🞎 Revised institutional materials and/or textbooks; 🞎 Requested additional resources through program review to improve student learning; 🞎 Revisions to examinations, course assignments, or class assignments and activities; 🞎 Participation in the collection of SLO data; �� Updated program learning outcomes; 🞎 Pedagogically sound class caps to maximize student success have been discussed with the Xxxx and/or Department Chair; �� Increased workload concerns relating to meeting accreditation standards have been discussed with the Xxxx and/or Department Chair; 🞎 Other (please specify) _ Faculty evaluation committee members shall not make reference to the foregoing in their evaluation comments or their summary report of the evaluee. Formatted: No underline For distance education or HyFlex assignments, no part of the video or audio recording or livestream may be used as part of the faculty member’s eval...
