Environmental Policies. You must: 1 Comply with applicable provisions of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.7401, et. seq.) and Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251, et. seq.), as implemented by Executive Order 11738 [3 CFR, 1971-1975 Comp., p. 799] and Environmental Protection Agency rules at 40 CFR part 32, Subpart J. 2 Immediately identify to us, as the awarding agency, any potential impact that you find this award may have on:
Environmental Policies. You must:
Environmental Policies. The Consultant, his/ her sub Consultants and their personnel shall be aware of and comply with both in letter and spirit the British Council’s Environmental Policy (available at xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/organisation/transparency/policies/environment-policy). The Consultant’s own environmental policy and procedures should demonstrate an ongoing commitment to improved environmental performance.
Environmental Policies. 18.1 The Supplier recognises the Company’s environmental targets and aspirations.
Environmental Policies. In keeping with environmental policies and practices, Boston Whaler reserves the right to utilize reconditioned, refurbished, repaired or remanufactured products or parts in the warranty repair or replacement process. Such products and parts will be comparable in function and performance to an original product or part and warranted for the remainder of the original warranty period.
Environmental Policies. Uncertainties are greater for many environmental problems and consequently consideration of uncertainty is more important and relevant for policy design and evaluation. Pindyck (2007) address three key complications that are often crucial to environmental policy, but are usually much less significant for most other policy decisions. These complications are first that environmental cost and benefit functions tend to be highly nonlinear. The second is that environmental policies usually involve important irreversibilities, and those irreversibilities sometimes interact in a complicated way with uncertainty. It was pointed out earlier that there are two kinds of irreversibilities that are relevant for environmental policies, and they work in opposite directions. Policies aimed at reducing environmental degradation almost always impose sunk costs on society. If future costs and benefits of the policy are uncertain, these sunk costs create an opportunity cost of adopting the policy, rather than waiting for more information about environmental impacts and their economic consequences. This implies that traditional cost-benefit analysis will be biased toward policy adoption. On the other hand, environmental damage is often partly or totally irreversible. This means that adopting a policy now rather than waiting has a sunk benefit, that is a negative opportunity cost. This implies that traditional cost-benefit analysis will be biased against policy adoption. The third complication is that, unlike most capital investment projects and most other public policy problems, environmental policies often involve very long time horizons. While net present value calculation for an investment rarely go beyond twenty or twenty-five years, the costs and especially the benefits from an environmental policy can extend for a hundred years or more. The problem of climate change is a well known example with long time horizons, but there are also others. The uncertainty regarding costs and benefits of policies increases with the time horizon. A long time horizon also makes discount rate uncertainty much more important. Uncertainty over future discount rates has an important implication for the choice of discount rate that we should use in practice—it makes that rate lower than any expected future discount rate.
Environmental Policies
