Environmental Policies Sample Clauses

Environmental Policies. You must: 1 Comply with applicable provisions of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.7401, et. seq.) and Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251, et. seq.), as implemented by Executive Order 11738 [3 CFR, 1971-1975 Comp., p. 799] and Environmental Protection Agency rules at 40 CFR part 32, Subpart J. 2 Immediately identify to us, as the awarding agency, any potential impact that you find this award may have on: a. The quality of the human environment, including wetlands, and provide any help we may need to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA, at 42 U.S.C. 4321 et. seq.) and assist us to prepare Environmental Impact Statements or other environmental documentation. In such cases, you may take no action that will have an adverse environmental impact (e.g., physical disturbance of a site such as breaking of ground) or limit the choice of reasonable alternatives until we provide written notification of Federal compliance with NEPA, as implemented by DOE at 10 CFR part 1021. ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇-prone areas, and provide any help we may need to comply with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4001 et. seq.), which require flood insurance, when available, for Federally assisted construction or acquisition in flood-prone areas, as implemented by DOE at 10 CFR part 1022. c. Use of land and water resources of coastal zones, and provide any help we may need to comply with the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972(16 U.S.C. 1451, et. seq.). d. Coastal barriers along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts and Great Lakes’ shores, and provide help we may need to comply with the Coastal Barriers Resource Act (16 U.S.C. 3501 et. seq.), concerning preservation of barrier resources. e. Any existing or proposed component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers system, and provide any help we may need to comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. 1271 et seq.). f. Underground sources of drinking water in areas that have an aquifer that is the sole or principal drinking water source, and provide any help we may need to comply with the Safe Drinking Water Act(42 U.S.C. 300h-3). 3 Comply with applicable provisions of the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. 4821-4846), as implemented by the Department of Housing and Urban Development at 24 CFR part 35. The requirements concern lead-based paint in housing owned by the Federal Government or receiving Federal assistance.

Environmental Policies. You must:

Environmental Policies. In keeping with environmental policies and practices, Boston Whaler reserves the right to utilize reconditioned, refurbished, repaired or remanufactured products or parts in the warranty repair or replacement process. Such products and parts will be comparable in function and performance to an original product or part and warranted for the remainder of the original warranty period.

Environmental Policies. 18.1 The Supplier recognises the Company’s environmental targets and aspirations. 18.2 The Supplier shall: (a) design products and provide services with environmental efficiencies in mind; (b) ensure a prudent use of packaging on all products; (c) take reasonable steps to ensure that all waste is minimised; (d) ensure that all recyclable waste is recycled; (e) take reasonable steps to prevent pollution through its operations; and (f) comply with all relevant environmental legislation.

Environmental Policies. The Consultant, his/ her sub Consultants and their personnel shall be aware of and comply with both in letter and spirit the British Council’s Environmental Policy (available at ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/organisation/transparency/policies/environment-policy). The Consultant’s own environmental policy and procedures should demonstrate an ongoing commitment to improved environmental performance.

Environmental Policies. ‌ Uncertainties are greater for many environmental problems and consequently consideration of uncertainty is more important and relevant for policy design and evaluation. Pindyck (2007) address three key complications that are often crucial to environmental policy, but are usually much less significant for most other policy decisions. These complications are first that environmental cost and benefit functions tend to be highly nonlinear. The second is that environmental policies usually involve important irreversibilities, and those irreversibilities sometimes interact in a complicated way with uncertainty. It was pointed out earlier that there are two kinds of irreversibilities that are relevant for environmental policies, and they work in opposite directions. Policies aimed at reducing environmental degradation almost always impose sunk costs on society. If future costs and benefits of the policy are uncertain, these sunk costs create an opportunity cost of adopting the policy, rather than waiting for more information about environmental impacts and their economic consequences. This implies that traditional cost-benefit analysis will be biased toward policy adoption. On the other hand, environmental damage is often partly or totally irreversible. This means that adopting a policy now rather than waiting has a sunk benefit, that is a negative opportunity cost. This implies that traditional cost-benefit analysis will be biased against policy adoption. The third complication is that, unlike most capital investment projects and most other public policy problems, environmental policies often involve very long time horizons. While net present value calculation for an investment rarely go beyond twenty or twenty-five years, the costs and especially the benefits from an environmental policy can extend for a hundred years or more. The problem of climate change is a well known example with long time horizons, but there are also others. The uncertainty regarding costs and benefits of policies increases with the time horizon. A long time horizon also makes discount rate uncertainty much more important. Uncertainty over future discount rates has an important implication for the choice of discount rate that we should use in practice—it makes that rate lower than any expected future discount rate.

Environmental Policies