Engagement Process Sample Clauses
Engagement Process. The PSA and HUD recognise that: • the process of change is continuous and should form part of the organisation’s continuous improvement • consultation and change require an effective communication process. The aims of the engagement process are to: • plan for evolutionary change • contribute to the best and most equitable decisions • provide employees with information to help them plan and develop their careers • ensure information on the location and names of employees likely to be affected by organisational change is made available to the PSA as soon as practicable • ensure the interests of employees are understood by HUD and taken into account. HUD and the PSA will meet as needed to discuss management of change. The intention of these meetings is that employees and the PSA are aware of and can contribute to, the overall planning process. In addition to the engagement process outlined above, HUD will notify the PSA prior to any internal review, or when a proposal has been made, which is likely to result in organisational change. This involvement will ideally be based on a shared understanding of the objectives of the proposed change, the desired outcomes and the options for change. The Chief Executive is required to implement decisions imposed by legislation or the policies of Government. It is acknowledged that this may limit the Chief Executive’s ability to consult with employees before the decision is announced. Consultation is an ongoing process that occurs prior to decisions being made. It creates discussion between all parties, and requires active input and full consideration of all points of view. The aim of consultation is to provide for employee and PSA feedback prior to decisions being made. Appropriate time will be allowed for this to occur. Once the change has been implemented, HUD and the PSA will have a post-implementation discussion.
Engagement Process. 4.1 The Parties agree that the process set out in Appendix B will be the means by which British Columbia will consult on proposed Operational Plans or proposed Administrative or Operational Decisions and, where appropriate, is the means by which British Columbia will identify potential measures to accommodate any potential adverse impacts on the shíshálh Nation’s Aboriginal Rights resulting from Operational Plans or Administrative or Operational Decisions
4.2 British Columbia will use the map of shíshálh Nation’s Territory set out in this Agreement at Appendix A.
4.3 shíshálh Nation agrees that British Columbia may share the map of the Territory as set out in Appendix A with another provincial government agency and/or a Licensee responsible for information sharing associated with a decision that is subject to this Agreement.
4.4 The Parties agree that in the event shíshálh Nation enters into a shared decision- making agreement or Reconcilliation Agreement with British Columbia after the Effective Date which includes a consultation process which addresses forest and range management and decision making, the consultation process set out in the Reconciliation Agreement or shared decision-making agreement will supersede and replace the consultation process set out in this Agreement for the term of the shared decision-making agreement if the shared decision-making agreement so provides; and in any such case, if the shared decision-making agreement or Reconcilliation Agreement terminates prior to the end of the Term, the Parties agree that the consultation process set out in Appendix B of this Agreement will apply for the remainder of the Term.
4.5 In the event that the Effective Date falls after the date on which shíshálh Nation enters into a shared decision-making agreement with British Columbia that includes a consultation process which addresses forest and range management and decision making, and the shared decision-making agreement is subsequently terminated prior to the end of the Term, Shíshálh Nation agrees that this Agreement will be amended within 60 days of the date of termination of the shared decision-making agreement to include a consultation process in this Agreement.
Engagement Process. Telephone: SupportConnect: Incident Severities and SupportConnect Target Response Times:
2 A high-impact condition associated with the product. Examples include missing functionality, errors, and significant performance degradation. 2
Engagement Process. 4.1 The Parties agree that the process set out in Appendix B will be the means by which British Columbia will consult on proposed Operational Plans or proposed Administrative or Operational Decisions and, where appropriate, is the means by which British Columbia will identify potential measures to accommodate any potential adverse impacts on the Lake ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ Section 35 Rights resulting from Operational Plans or Administrative or Operational Decisions.
4.2 British Columbia will use the map of Lake ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ Territory set out in this Agreement as Appendix A.
4.3 Lake ▇▇▇▇▇▇ agrees that British Columbia may share the map of the Territory as set out in Appendix A with another provincial government agency and/or a Licensee responsible for information sharing associated with a decision that is subject to this Agreement.
4.4 The Parties agree that, pursuant to the Foundation Agreement, they expect to replace the consultation process set out in Appendix B with new approaches to some or all of the Operational Plans and Administrative or Operational Decisions; they will make such replacement(s) explicit in their new agreement(s).
Engagement Process. 3.1 While the Parties may develop improvements to decision-making processes for forest and range activities as part of their implementation of the Pathway 2.0 Agreement and negotiations identified in that agreement:
3.1.1 the Parties will collaborate on certain strategic proposed decisions in relation to forest and range activities in the Territories that are agreed to in advance by the Parties;
Engagement Process. 4.1 The Province and the Haisla Nation will use the Updated Procedures, 2010, as amended from time to time to reflect new judicial decisions, and the additional Engagement processes set out in this Amending Agreement, 2011, including the processes set out in Table 1 of this Appendix D to guide their Engagement on proposed Land and Resource Decisions.
4.2 The Province and the Haisla Nation will apply the Engagement processes set out in this Amending Agreement, 2011, to Applications received and Engagements initiated by a Provincial Agency, on or after the 30th day after the Effective Date.
4.3 the Province and the Haisla Nation may agree to apply the Engagement processes set out in this Amending Agreement, 2011, to Applications that are received from an Applicant and to Land and Resource Decisions that are initiated by a Provincial Agency before the date referred to in section 4.2.
4.4 Upon receiving an Application or initiating a Land and Resource Decision, the Provincial Agency will commence Engagement by providing the Haisla Nation with an Information Package that includes:
a) a description of the type and characteristics of the proposed Land and Resource Decision;
b) the identity and contact information of the Applicant or existing Tenure Holder(s) who are the subject of the proposed Land and Resource Decision;
c) a description of the specific location or geographic area that will be impacted by the proposed Land and Resource Decision;
d) all relevant and available Applications, documents, studies and assessments; and
e) a description of the proposed Engagement Level and a supporting rationale for that proposed classification
4.5 The Provincial Agency will contact the Haisla Nation by telephone or email, within 5 business days of sending the Information Package, to confirm date of receipt by the Haisla Nation, and to confirm initiation of Engagement.
4.6 The Provincial Agency will, at the earliest opportunity, inform Applicants and other Provincial Agencies, as applicable, of this Engagement process with the Haisla Nation and, as appropriate, direct those Applicants and Provincial Agencies to contact and provide information directly to the Haisla Nation. Notwithstanding any such direction by a Provincial Agency, the Provincial Agency remains responsible for ensuring that a full and complete information package is sent to the Haisla Nation.
4.7 Within 10 business days of receipt, the Haisla Nation will provide the Provincial Agency with written confirmat...
Engagement Process. ▇▇▇▇▇ Harbour Marina Development Pty Ltd in consultation with Respondent Aboriginal parties will engage an Archaeologist to be on call during the Construction Phase of the Project. Contact details of the Project Archaeologist will be provided after development approvals and prior to construction.
Engagement Process a. To engage our services, you must provide a detailed description of your requirements and any relevant documentation.
b. We will review your requirements and provide you with a proposal, including an estimated timeline and cost.
c. Upon acceptance of the proposal, we will enter into a separate agreement that will detail the project scope, milestones, deliverables, and any other relevant terms.
Engagement Process. 1.1 British Columbia will consult with shíshálh Nation on Proposed Decisions in accordance with this Engagement Process.
1.2 shíshálh Nation will participate in consultation with British Columbia or with Licensees or licence proponents on Proposed Decisions in accordance with this Engagement Process.
1.3 The Parties will follow the Engagement Process for Proposed Decisions where that consultation is initiated after the Effective Date of the Agreement.
1.4 The Parties agree that the Engagement Process will not apply to the following Proposed Decision types, and British Columbia will provide an annual summary report to shíshálh Nation prior to March 31, 2016, indicating how many such decisions were made:
1.4.1 Free Use Permits, other than those for First Nation Cultural use;
Engagement Process