Economy of Presentation Sample Clauses
Economy of Presentation. Unnecessarily elaborate Proposals beyond those sufficient to provide a complete and effective response to this RFP are not desired and may be construed as an indication of the Respondent’s lack of ability to provide efficient work products. The Respondent must adhere to page limits where specified. Page limits are listed in parentheses at the end of the title of the section. A three (3) page limit, for example, means that the response should not be in excess of three (3) one-sided pages that meet the size, font, and margin requirements specified in the General Instructions in Section 4.1 above. Some page limits are identical regardless of the number of MCO Programs in which a Respondent is proposing to participate. If a page limit is listed but does not include the phrase “per MCO Program,” the page limit applies to the entire response regardless of the number of MCO Programs bid. In these cases, the page limit will be indicated as a set number, e.g., “3 pages.” In some cases, additional pages are provided for Respondents proposing to serve more than one MCO Program. For example, “3 pages plus 1 additional page per additional MCO Program” indicates that a Respondent proposing to serve one (1) MCO Program has a three (3) page limit, a Respondent proposing to serve two (2) MCO Programs has a four (4) page limit, and a Respondent proposing to serve all three (3) MCO Programs has a five (5) page limit. This page limit approach is designed to give Respondents submitting a Proposal for multiple MCO Programs sufficient space to respond to the submission requirement when submission responses differ across MCO Programs. Respondents proposing to serve multiple programs should have similar or identical approaches across MCO Programs where administrative efficiencies are possible and appropriate. Respondents must clearly indicate differences, if any, in their response to each submission requirement for each applicable MCO Program. In other cases, additional pages may be provided based on certain aspects of the Respondent’s Proposal or organization, such as the number of organizational charts submitted reflecting arrangements with Material Subcontractors, or the number of Key Contract Personnel included in the Proposal for Respondents proposing to serve more than one MCO Program. Finally, some page limits are by MCO Program, e.g., two (2) pages per MCO Program means that a Respondent proposing to serve all three (3) MCO Programs would have a six (6) page limit for that...
Economy of Presentation. The Vendor must use sections and tabs that are clearly identified and also must number and label all parts, pages, figures, and tables in its solicitation response. Vendor should prepare its solicitation response simply and economically, providing a straightforward, concise description of the Vendor’s capability to satisfy the conditions and requirements of this competitive solicitation. (Fancy bindings, colored displays, and promotional material are not desired). Vendor’s emphasis should be on completeness and clarity of content. To expedite FIU’s evaluation of the solicitation response, it is mandatory that Vendor follow the instructions contained herein. FIU is not liable for any costs incurred by Vendors in responding to this competitive solicitation including, without limitation, costs for any oral presentations requested by FIU.
Economy of Presentation. Each proposal shall be prepared simply and economically, providing straightforward, concise delineation of Qualified Contractor's capabilities to satisfy the requirements of this RFP. Fancy bindings, colored displays, and promotional materials are not required. Emphasis on each proposal must be on completeness and clarity of content. To expedite the evaluation of proposals, it is essential that Qualified Contractors follow the format and instructions contained herein. Each Original Proposal should be bound with an index and each section should be delimited by tabbed section dividers. Noted and understood.