Duty Cycle Test Sample Clauses

Duty Cycle Test. This test entails the period during which the Project would be discharged from 100% SoC down to the Minimum SoC and then charged back to 100% SoC. The required performance guaranty would involve the duration of the Duty Cycle. This will vary depending on the duration design of the Energy Storage system (e.g., 2 hours, 4 hours, etc.).
View SourceView Similar (6)
Duty Cycle Test. This test entails the period during which the Project would be discharged from 100% SoC down to the Minimum SoC and then charged back to 100% SoC. The required performance guaranty would involve the duration of the Duty Cycle. This will vary depending on the duration design of the Energy Storage system (e.g., 2 hours, 4 hours, etc.). The Monthly Energy Payment is equal to the sum of the Monthly VOM, the Monthly Pass-Through Charge, and the Guaranteed Roundtrip Efficiency Credit. The Monthly variable operations & maintenance (“Monthly VOM”) payment is equal to $XXX/MWh multiplied by the Monthly Delivered Energy in MWh. Monthly Pass-Through Charges: Cost of Station Service Energy O&M charges relating to Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities O&M charges related to Connecting Transmission Owner’s System Upgrade Facilities O&M charges related to Connecting Transmission Owner’s System Deliverability Upgrades Guaranteed Roundtrip Efficiency Credit (as defined in APPENDIX 7: GUARANTEED ROUNDTRIP EFFICIENCY CREDIT) Monthly Capacity Payments will be adjusted by multiplying the Monthly Capacity Payment otherwise due under Section 5.1 and APPENDIX 4: CAPACITY PAYMENT by the “Monthly Capacity Adjustment Factor” or “MCAF,” calculated as follows: MCAF = Lesser of 1.0 or MCA for such Month Where:
View Source

Related to Duty Cycle Test

  • Performance Testing (a) All performance tests of the Project, including any Initial Performance Test required in Section 2 of Appendix VIII, will be performed in accordance with the test procedures set forth in Appendix VIII (“Performance Test”), including additional procedures and protocols related to Performance Testing as mutually agreed between Buyer and Seller (“Test Procedures”). Seller shall bear all costs and receive all revenues, if applicable, associated with all Performance Tests. (b) After the Initial Delivery Date and during the Delivery Term, Buyer will have the right to conduct a Performance Test (“Buyer Performance Test”) no more than once a calendar year to demonstrate whether the Project is capable of delivering the Distribution Services at the Contract Capacity. Within 30 calendar days following a Buyer Performance Test, Seller will have the right to retest the Project with a Performance Test (“Seller Retest”). For the avoidance of doubt, the results of any Seller Retest will supersede the results of the preceding Buyer Performance Test. (i) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is capable of delivering Distribution Services at or above ninety-nine percent (99%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, the Contract Capacity will remain the Initial Contract Capacity; (ii) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is capable of delivering Distribution Services at more than or equal to eighty-five (85%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, but less than ninety-nine percent (99%) of the Initial Contract Capacity (“Testing Band”), the Contract Capacity will be automatically adjusted (upwards or downwards) to the capacity commensurate with the amount of Distribution Services the Project delivered during the Performance Test within the Testing Band. (iii) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is not capable of delivering Distribution Services of at least eighty-five percent (85%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, an Event of Default shall occur in accordance with Section 7.1(a)(viii).

  • Performance Tests Contractor shall perform Performance Tests in accordance with Section 11.2 of the Agreement and Attachment S.

  • Random Testing Notwithstanding any provisions of the Collective Agreement or any special agreements appended thereto, section 4.6 of the Canadian Model will not be applied by agreement. If applied to a worker dispatched by the Union, it will be applied or deemed to be applied unilaterally by the Employer. The Union retains the right to grieve the legality of any imposition of random testing in accordance with the Grievance Procedure set out in this Collective Agreement.

  • Drug Testing (A) The state and the PBA agree to drug testing of employees in accordance with section 112.0455, F.S., the Drug-Free Workplace Act. (B) All classes covered by this Agreement are designated special risk classes for drug testing purposes. Special risk means employees who are required as a condition of employment to be certified under Chapter 633 or Chapter 943, F.S. (C) An employee shall have the right to grieve any disciplinary action taken under section 112.0455, the Drug-Free Workplace Act, subject to the limitations on the grievability of disciplinary actions in Article 10. If an employee is not disciplined but is denied a demotion, reassignment, or promotion as a result of a positive confirmed drug test, the employee shall have the right to grieve such action in accordance with Article 6.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is a NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASPP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram, , the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”), and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by LEA pursuant to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. ▇▇▇ shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by ▇▇▇.