Common use of DPS School Performance Framework (SPF) Clause in Contracts

DPS School Performance Framework (SPF). The School shall annually Meet Expectations or Exceed Expectations on the DPS School Performance Framework or make adequate progress towards this objective. The School will only receive an official SPF rating for the entity recognized in this Contract and identified by a CDE supplied school number. No subdivision of the School shall receive a public rating. If the School’s grade configuration or population is such that they are issued a DPS Alternative School Performance Framework or DPS Early Education School Performance Framework in lieu of the traditional SPF, these results will be used to evaluate the School’s academic performance. The School will have the ability to review the SPF prior to its release and provide comments on accuracy, access to student level data, and access to the rubrics outlining how SPF metrics are calculated. i. If the School Performance Framework is not available on a timeline to inform accountability processes, the District will set targets based on available data that are equally rigorous to the target of Meeting Expectations on the prior year's SPF. ii. For the purposes of this Contract, the District and School have mutually agreed to the performance benchmarks that shall constitute adequate progress towards meeting SPF expectations. To be found to have made adequate progress, the School must meet the following performance benchmarks in their entirety: NO ADDITIONAL BENCHMARKS

Appears in 1 contract

Sources: Charter School Contract

DPS School Performance Framework (SPF). The School shall annually Meet Expectations or Exceed Expectations on the DPS School Performance Framework or make adequate progress towards this objective. The School will only receive an official SPF rating for the entity recognized in this Contract and identified by a CDE supplied school number. No subdivision of the School shall receive a public rating. If the School’s grade configuration or population is such that they are issued a DPS Alternative School Performance Framework or DPS Early Education School Performance Framework in lieu of the traditional SPF, these results will be used to evaluate the School’s academic performance. The School will have the ability to review the SPF prior to its release and provide comments on accuracy, access to student level data, and access to the rubrics outlining how SPF metrics are calculated. i. If the School Performance Framework is not available on a timeline to inform accountability processes, the District following performance targets shall be used as a proxy for a rating of 1. On the CMAS Assessment, the average scale score of students shall be within 5% of their similar schools cluster in both English Language Arts and Mathematics; 2. The School’s overall ACCESS MGP will set targets based on available data that are equally rigorous to the target be at or above 50; 3. For high schools, 35% of Meeting Expectations students will meet college readiness benchmarks on the prior year's SPFSAT in reading and 20% of students will meet math SAT college readiness benchmarks; and 4. The school will meet SPF status benchmarks on their early literacy assessment. ii. For the purposes of this Contract, the District and School have mutually agreed to the performance benchmarks that shall constitute adequate progress towards meeting SPF expectations. To be found to have made adequate progress, the School must meet the following performance benchmarks in their entirety: NO ADDITIONAL BENCHMARKS.

Appears in 1 contract

Sources: Charter School Contract