Digital Maturity Assessment Sample Clauses

Digital Maturity Assessment. The following table shows the planned improvement trajectory to improve Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust’s NHS Digital Maturity Index self-assessment over the life of the programme. GHNT Board has formally endorsed the annually refreshed ‘Health Informatics Plan 2015 to 2020’ which details the enhancements required to deliver the planned improvement trajectory. This trajectory fits naturally alongside the XxXX trajectory, enabling GHNT to invest based on the improvements implemented in the GDE; ensuring wider collaboration across the Local Delivery Roadmap footprint. Section Type National Score (2016) Baseline Score (2016) National Score (2017) Baseline Score (2017) Target (18/19) Target (19/20) Target Score (20/21) Strategic Alignment Readiness 76 90 87 90 95 100 100 Leadership Readiness 77 95 85 91 95 100 100 Resourcing Readiness 66 75 78 90 90 95 100 Governance Readiness 74 90 81 92 95 100 100 Information Governance Capabilities 73 71 80 91 95 100 100 Records, Assessments and Plans Capabilities 44 36 52 47 70 90 100* Transfers Of Care Capabilities 48 47 65 70 80 90 100* Orders & Results Management Capabilities 55 72 73 77 85 95 100 Medicines Optimisation Capabilities 30 0 44 53 70 90 100 Decision Support Capabilities 36 36 45 52 65 80 100 Remote and Assistive Care Capabilities 32 17 39 17 40 70 100 Asset and Resource Optimisation Capabilities 42 40 56 61 70 90 95** Standards Standards 41 54 59 46 65 85 100*** Enabling Infrastructure Enabling Infrastructure 68 66 75 71 80 90 100 Business and Clinical Intelligence Capabilities N/A N/A 70 75 85 95 100 NOTES based on GDE submission: * Assumes national solution for tertiary referrals implemented and eReferral solution is brought in line with interoperability standards by NHS Digital. ** Dependency on the implementation and exploitation of GS1 barcodes across every asset in the Trust; whether those assets are beds, medical devices, implants, medications, rooms, patients, staff. *** Dependency on Scan for Safety for GS1 barcode compliance. This will be taken forward under the Trust’s standard mechanism for all IT deliverables, the Health Informatics Strategy Group.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Digital Maturity Assessment

  • Security Assessment If Accenture reasonably determines, or in good faith believes, that Supplier’s security practices or procedures do not meet Supplier’s obligations under the Agreement, then Accenture will notify Supplier of the deficiencies. Supplier will without unreasonable delay: (i) correct such deficiencies at its own expense; (ii) permit Accenture, or its duly authorized representatives, to assess Supplier’s security-related activities that are relevant to the Agreement; and (iii) timely complete a security questionnaire from Accenture on a periodic basis upon Accenture’s request. Security issues identified by Accenture will be assigned risk ratings and an agreed-to timeframe to remediate. Supplier will remediate all the security issues identified within the agreed to timeframes. Upon Supplier’s failure to remediate any high or medium rated security issues within the stated timeframes, Accenture may terminate the Agreement in accordance with Section 8 above.

  • Security Assessments Upon advance written notice by the JBE, Contractor agrees that the JBE shall have reasonable access to Contractor’s operational documentation, records, logs, and databases that relate to data security and the Contractor’s Information Security Program. Upon the JBE’s request, Contractor shall, at its expense, perform, or cause to have performed an assessment of Contractor’s compliance with its privacy and data security obligations. Contractor shall provide to the JBE the results, including any findings and recommendations made by Contractor’s assessors, of such assessment, and, at its expense, take any corrective actions.

  • Diagnostic Assessment 6.3.1 Boards shall provide a list of pre-approved assessment tools consistent with their Board improvement plan for student achievement and which is compliant with Ministry of Education PPM (PPM 155: Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Student Learning, date of issue January 7, 2013).

  • Conformity Assessment 1. The Parties recognize that a broad range of mechanisms exists to facilitate the acceptance of conformity assessment procedures and results thereby, including:

  • System Security Review All systems processing and/or storing DHCS PHI or PI must have at least an annual system risk assessment/security review which provides assurance that administrative, physical, and technical controls are functioning effectively and providing adequate levels of protection. Reviews should include vulnerability scanning tools.

  • Evaluation Cycle: Formative Assessment A) A specific purpose for evaluation is to promote student learning, growth and achievement by providing Educators with feedback for improvement. Evaluators are expected to make frequent unannounced visits to classrooms. Evaluators are expected to give targeted constructive feedback to Educators based on their observations of practice, examination of artifacts, and analysis of multiple measures of student learning, growth and achievement in relation to the Standards and Indicators of Effective Teaching Practice.

  • Phase II A small portion of the work for the Phase II modifications to the Plattsburgh Substation will be performed by Transmission Owner, and the remainder will be performed by Clinton and Xxxxxxxxx. A detailed definition of the specific scope for Transmission Owner and Clinton and Xxxxxxxxx including interface points shall be defined during the design phase and, as such documents become available, copies will be delivered to the NYISO, Transmission Owner, Noble Altona Windpark, LLC and Marble River, LLC. The full scope includes the installation of wave traps, CCVT’s and modifications and/or additions to relaying on the MWP-1 and MWP- 2 lines. These lines will be reconfigured at the completion of Phase II to connect to Xxxxx and Xxxxxxx Substations on MWP-1 and the Xxxx Substation on MWP-2. Clinton and Xxxxxxxxx will design the upgrades and purchase the materials based on the outline specification that was prepared and issued by Transmission Owner. The work to be performed by Clinton and Xxxxxxxxx will include both the materials for the exterior and interior installations and items for Transmission Owner installation inside the control building in existing relay panels and communication racks. In addition, Clinton and Xxxxxxxxx will be responsible for the exterior and interior construction work and will provide construction management services in coordination with Transmission Owner. The civil design for the foundations and the electrical design for the cable runs to the control room will be designed by, as approved by Transmission Owner, and installed under the supervision and control of Clinton and Xxxxxxxxx. The equipment will be selected and procured in accordance with the specifications developed during the detailed engineering phase, copies of which shall be furnished to the NYISO, Transmission Owner, Noble Altona Windpark, LLC and Marble River, LLC. The construction of the foundations, structures, wave traps, CCTV and cable runs into the control building to the termination cabinets will be completed by Clinton and Xxxxxxxxx. The work at the Plattsburgh Substation will be installed under Transmission Owner’s CPP-1. Transmission Owner will provide Protection and Controls Engineering, install and terminate wiring from the termination cabinets to the control panels and relays, install relays and equipment in the existing panels, and will commission such work inside the 230kV control building. Transmission Owner will develop the communications protocols and data flow over the circuits.

  • PROPERTY ASSESSMENT The Buyer and Seller hereby acknowledge that the Province of Ontario has implemented current value assessment and properties may be re-assessed on an annual basis. The Buyer and Seller agree that no claim will be made against the Buyer or Seller, or any Brokerage, Broker or Salesperson, for any changes in property tax as a result of a re-assessment of the property, save and except any property taxes that accrued prior to the completion of this transaction.

  • Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.