Design Process. 17.1 Unless otherwise agreed by the Owner, the Design-Builder will submit Drawings and Specifications and supporting information to the Owner for review under the Review Procedure at the following Design stages:
Design Process. Franchisee will obtain the Design Criteria from Franchisor within 10 days of the Effective Date for the Initial Work, and in a timely manner for any Periodic Renovation. In connection with the Initial Work and any Periodic Renovation, Franchisee will comply with the following requirements (the “Design Process”):
Design Process. The design process is defined in two stages, Preliminary Coverage Design and Revised Coverage Design. Included in the design process are non-coverage items such as [*****].
Design Process. Project design files will be provided via a prototyping platform (InVision or Figma) for review and feedback.
Design Process. The first step in applying natural hydrology site design is to identify, delineate and assess the functions of all existing natural resources and natural and man-made hydrologic features that: are located within the project site; will receive discharge from the project site; or, may be impacted by runoff or disturbance from the proposed land development project. This includes: • Streams, waterways, springs, wetlands, vernal pools, and water bodies; • Drainage patterns, conveyances and discharge points; • Natural infiltration areas and patterns; • Areas of natural vegetation that provide significant evapotranspiration, pollutant removal, bank stabilization, flow attenuation, or riparian buffer functions; • Floodplains; and • Other features that contribute to the overall hydrologic function and value of the site and its receiving streams. Once this inventory and assessment are completed, these identified resources and features are then prioritized for their ability to provide hydrologic function and performance for managing runoff from the proposed site improvements. Specifically, they should be prioritized as follows: • Those to be incorporated into the site design in a manner that provides for their protection from any disturbance or impact from the proposed land development; • Those to be protected from further disturbance or impact and for which the proposed land development will provide improvement to existing conditions; • Those that can be incorporated into and utilized as components of the overall site design in a manner that protects or improves their existing conditions while utilizing their hydrologic function (e.g., for infiltration, evapotranspiration, or reducing pollutant loads, runoff volume or peak discharge rates, etc.) to reduce the need for or size of constructed BMPs; and • Those that may be considered for alteration, disturbance or removal. These prioritizations are then applied as the basis on which to begin the site design lay-out, grading, construction, and permanent ground cover designs to achieve the five (5) Design Principles outlined above. The following section describes just a few of the many design practices, methods and techniques that are available to achieve the landowner’s desired land development goals and the desired environmental efficiencies intended by natural hydrology site design. Table B.1 – Site Design Process Principles and Techniques Design Principles Design Techniques Minimize land disturbance – both surface an...
Design Process. Xxxxxx Energy acknowledges and agrees that it will begin design upon acceptance of 30% design documents.
Design Process. The Building design and pre-construction process (the “Design Process”) shall proceed as set forth in this Clause 4.3. The cumulative time period for the steps set forth in paragraphs (i)-(vi) below, as the same may be extended for dispute resolution between the parties or as otherwise expressly provided herein, shall be hereinafter referred to as the “Design Period.” In the event that Tenant fails to provide written comments during any relevant time period set forth below for any step in the Design Process, and such failure continues for a period of three (3) additional Business Days after receipt of notice thereof from Landlord [notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, such notice shall be deliverable by email and telephone (which telephonic notice requirement may be satisfied by a voicemail message) to at least one (1) of Tenant's Representatives], Tenant shall be deemed to have approved the relevant Design Documents and Landlord shall nonetheless be authorized to provide Landlord's comments to the Design Firm and to proceed to the next step in the Design Process in the manner set forth herein below. In connection with the foregoing, Tenant shall be entitled to notice and three (3) additional Business Days to provide written comments as set forth in the immediately preceding sentence no more than three (3) times during the Design Process. After the third such occurrence, the above-described deemed approval shall occur upon the passage of the relevant approval/comment date. The parties may, by mutual written agreement, extend the time period for any stage of the Design Process by up to fifteen (15) days. Tenant may, at Tenant's sole cost and expense, hire a third party to conduct an independent review of the Design Documents, or any of them (“Peer Review”), provided that: (1) such independent reviewer enters into a non-disclosure agreement, the form and content of which shall be subject to Landlord's prior written approval, not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed; (2) the scope of the independent reviewer's comments shall be limited by the same parameters which are set forth below for the Tenant comments on the Design Document for the relevant period; and (3) the independent reviewer's comments on a Design Document shall be delivered within the time period set forth below for delivery of Tenant comments during the relevant Design Document period. For the avoidance of doubt, the Tenant comment period and any independent reviewer co...
Design Process. Starting from the scaled model of the initial prototype design, changes were made to the important input parameters of the inverse design method such as the spanwise rV distribution which equates to the swirl or work produced across the rotor, the streamwise blade loading and axial chord distribution across the span to create new designs for the contra-rotating stage. These new designs were then evaluated by CFD and the results of this manual “design optimization” process are described in this report.
Design Process. The Selection Committee is comprised of members from the Sculpture Trail Committee. These members evaluated and scored the application for the sculpture call. Selection Committee shall be kept up to date on the progress of the sculpture. Photographs of the sculpture at the various stages of design shall be sent to the Purchaser c/o the Parks Planning Manager, De’Xxxx Xxxxxx. The Selection Committee will be allowed to visit the studio during the making of the sculpture.
Design Process. The City has engaged the services of Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Architects (“GBA”) to complete the conceptual plan of the Project. On the Effective Date of this Agreement, Redstone shall pay to the City an amount of $29,236.00 which is non-refundable and represents Redstone’s contribution and payment for the conceptual plans and public process aspects of the Project allocable to the Redstone Project. GBA shall be responsible for preparing the preliminary design plans for the Project, including hiring the necessary architectural, landscape, engineering and related consultants needed to develop the plans for the permitting of the Project (the “Plans”). The Plan shall be in sufficient detail to be submitted in connection with the permit proceedings referenced below in the Permit Phase. The City shall be responsible for negotiating GBA’s scope of work and associated fees, with input from Redstone. The City shall have control of the design of the entire City Project. The “Project Requirements” relating to the design of the Project are attached as Exhibit “C”. Redstone shall engage GBA as its architect for the Redstone Project and shall work with GBA and have access to the designs for the City Project. Redstone shall control the design of the upper floors, first floor residential lobby, and interior layout and fit-up for the Redstone Project, but with the City’s review and approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. The City shall be responsible for GBA’s fees relating to the City Project and Redstone shall be responsible for GBA’s fees relating to the Redstone Project, as set forth on the final Payment Schedule. The parties agree to work with the Efficiency Vermont Net Zero Pilot Program (the “Net Zero Program”) and agree to incorporate recommendations of the Net Zero Program into the Project provided that such recommendations can be accommodated in a cost effective manner, as determined and agreed to by the parties. On or before the end of the Pre-Permitting and Design Phase, Redstone and the City shall promptly meet to review the Project Budget, Project Schedule, Payment Schedule, Legal Structure, Plans, and findings, recommendations and reports referenced in Section 1(b) of this Agreement to determine whether to proceed to the next phase of development. To the extent that the City determines that it has made substantial progress in obtaining the items described above in Section 1(b), but needs more time to have all the items in place, th...
