Description of the Challenge Clause Samples

Description of the Challenge. The Challenge is listed in the Challenges page of Open Innovability® (▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇) on the dedicated page: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/projects/designing-a-sustainable-secondary-substation.
View Source
Description of the Challenge. Due to the lack of regulation on the adoption of semantic standards for health information at EU level, MS/C have addressed their needs through the adoption of national standards or divergent international standards. Therefore, the decision on which standard to adopt has been taken in MS/C according to their internal exchange and analysis needs, and not according to any alignment with any criteria from other European authorities. So far, MS/C have achieved different levels of adoption and implementation of modelling and semantic standards that enable semantic interoperability of health data. Many national-level decisions are trying to cope with internal interoperability issues, lack of national semantic resources and conflicting interests among national stakeholders. Existing standards- based solutions and systems may be aimed to address immediate priorities but often tend to have limited applicability outside each national environment and are not easily sustainable in the long term. This causes a situation of high heterogeneity of semantic standards adopted and in use in the EU, and consequently a low alignment between MS/C for the exchange of information. To solve this, it may not be realistic to force MS/C to implement a retrospective adoption of standards, or to impose standards prospectively in the short term. This situation of high heterogeneity of semantic standards in use, and low alignment between MS/C represents a challenge that must be resolved to achieve genuine semantic interoperability among the MS/C of the EU. Evolving and maintain Semantic Assets and Capacity Building aligned with universities; ▇▇▇▇▇▇ National Terminology/Semantic Centres.
View Source
Description of the Challenge. The Challenge is relevant to the following issue: Solutions to improve and speed up O&M of charging infrastructure
View Source

Related to Description of the Challenge

  • Description of the service 10.1.1 Automatic transfer service implies a transfer by the bank of the funds from the client’s account without further consent of the client, on the basis of fixed amount determined by the client in its application form or of information provided by the client’s creditor to the bank on the client’s debt. 10.1.2 The parties agree that the payment order created (generated) by the bank for the purposes of automatic transfer services shall have the legal force equal to the document having been printed on the paper and executed by the person(s) authorized to manage of the account. 10.1.3 The bank shall carry out the automatic transfer services in accordance with requirements and conditions stipulated in this agreement, the application on registration for automatic transfer service and the sources disseminated by the bank. 10.1.4 For the purposes of obtaining automatic transfer services the client shall apply to the bank with the application as per paragraph 1.2 of this agreement.

  • Description of the Services 1.1 The scope of the service to be rendered is described more fully in the Annexures and Schedules referred to below: ❑ Annexure A – Scope / Specification ❑ Annexure C – Pricing Schedule The Deliverables, due for completion by and governed by this Schedule 1. In the event that the Service Provider fails to meet the delivery dates as agreed, the following penalties will be imposed:

  • Grievability Denial of a petition for reinstatement is grievable. The grievance may not be based on information other than that shared with the Employer at the time of the petition for reinstatement.

  • General Allegations The Settling Entity enters into this Settlement Agreement on behalf of the noticed violator described in subsection 1.4 below, with whom such Settling Entity has a contract for one or more of the products at issue which contains indemnity and defense clauses. The Settling Entity has accepted a tender from the noticed violator and approached ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ to resolve such violator’s alleged liability. Additionally, the Settling Entity is making commitments in furtherance of the public interest as set forth below. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ alleges that the Settling Entity manufactures, imports, distributes, sells and/or otherwise facilitates for sale in California the lead products defined below, and that it does so without providing the health hazard warning required by Proposition 65 for consumer exposures to lead. Lead is listed pursuant to Proposition 65 as a chemical known to the State of California to cause cancer, and birth defects or other reproductive harm.

  • Complaints and Appeals As a Premera member, you have the right to offer your ideas, ask questions, voice complaints and request a formal appeal to reconsider decisions we have made. Our goal is to listen to your concerns and improve our service to you. If you need an interpreter to help with oral translation, please call us. Customer Service will be able to guide you through the service. We would like to hear from you. If you have an idea, suggestion, or opinion, please let us know. You can contact us at the addresses and telephone numbers found on the back cover. Please call us when you have questions about a benefit or coverage decision, our services, or the quality or availability of a healthcare service. We can quickly and informally correct errors, clarify benefits, or take steps to improve our service. We suggest that you call your provider of care when you have questions about the healthcare they provide.