Cost of Implementation Sample Clauses

Cost of Implementation. The cost of implementing committee agreements and resolutions shall be shared equally by LRCEA and the District. Salary and fringe benefit costs resulting from such agreements shall be borne by LRCEA’s proportionate share of new monies.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Cost of Implementation. Some Members of Congress have expressed concerns about the cost to the federal government to implement the agreements.27 Most have assumed that the majority of actions in the KBRA would be federally funded, including the costs for the on-project plan, fisheries restoration, and tribal components of the agreement. A detailed discussion of the estimated costs for the agreements (in particular those for the KBRA) and how they have changed over time is provided below. There have been multiple estimates of the cost to implement the Klamath agreements, and in some cases these have contradicted one another or employed differing assumptions. The original 2010 KBRA estimated $970 million (in 2007 dollars) for the total cost to implement the KBRA over a 10-year window. Most of these costs were assumed to be incurred by the federal government, although the exact split was not specified.28 In 2011, this figure was revised to estimate the federal government’s portion of expenses over a newly extended 15-year window. This estimate indicated that the federal cost to implement the agreement over 15 years would be $795 million (2007 dollars). Thus, there was a reduction in the estimated costs using constant 2007 dollars. The 2011 revision reflected increased state commitments for some activities and altered assumptions in other areas.29 The 2011 estimate also included an estimate of “base” 25 DOI has estimated that dam removal itself will create approximately 1,400 jobs in the one-year timeframe for this project, while other actions under the KBRA will create 4,600 jobs over 15 years, with additional gains to farming and fisheries industries; See Klamath Regional Economics Fact Sheet, available at xxxx://xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/sites/ xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/xxxxx/Xxxx.Xxxx.Xxxxx.Xxxx.00.xxx. 26 Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx, “Dewatering Trust Responsibility: the New Klamath River Hydroelectric and Restoration Agreements,” Washington Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, vol. 1, no. 1 (July 2011), p. 60. Available at xxxx://xxxxxxx.xxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx/dspace-law/bitstream/handle/1773.1/1043/1WJELP042.pdf?sequence=1. 27 U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, Water Resource Issues in the Klamath River Basin, 113th Cong., 1st sess., June 20, 2013. Statement of Chairman Xxx Xxxxx, xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xxxxxx.xxx/public/ index.cfm/files/serve?File_id=bf0f660b-1905-4515-9278-c26ddda53a21. 28 Cost estimates for the agreement were originally provided in the KBRA, Appe...
Cost of Implementation. The parties agree that the effective date of this new job classification system shall be August 1, 2003. For the purpose of adjusting the wage of those employees, who are eligible for a wage adjustment, as provided by the new classification system, the GTAA will allocate the following amounts: Year Maximum Total Adjustment per Year August 1, 2003 to July 31, 2004 $100,000 August 1, 2004 to July 31, 2005 $125,000 August 1, 2005 to July 31, 2006 $150,000 The formula for calculating adjustments will be as follows: • where the positions are found to be overvalued as a result of the new wage classification system, the incumbent of those positions will not receive any further wage increases until such time they reach their equivalent wage on the newly assigned wages and salary rates. • a salaried employee whose new classification carries a maximum rate of pay which is higher than his or her previous maximum shall have his or her salary adjusted upward to the increment which is nearest to but not less than his or her current rate of pay; • an hourly employee who is reclassified to a higher hourly paid position shall be paid the hourly rate prescribed for the position. The distribution of the above maximum total annual adjustments will be allocated on a pro-rata basis in relation to the job rate gap. The third party’s jurisdiction shall be restricted to this Memorandum of Understanding. All time limits referred to herein may be adjusted by mutual agreement. Appendix “G” MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE GREATER TORONTO AIRPORTS AUTHORITY (“Employer”) -and- THE PUBLIC SERVICE ALLIANCE OF CANADA (“Union”) The GTAA commits to maintaining the current salary of employees who were previously provided for under article 34:06(c) of the previous collective agreement. Appendix “H” MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE GREATER TORONTO AIRPORTS AUTHORITY (“Employer”) -and- THE PUBLIC SERVICE ALLIANCE OF CANADA (“Union”) The Employer agrees to investigate the establishment of an optional extended health care plan, similar to that contained in the collective agreement, for retired employees, with the full premium paid by the retired employees. The employer will report the results of investigation to the Union within 90 days of the ratification of the collective agreement. Appendix “I” MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE GREATER TORONTO AIRPORTS AUTHORITY (“Employer”) - and - THE PUBLIC SERVICE ALLIANCE OF CANADA (“Union”) Shift Scheduling Committee The parties agree...

Related to Cost of Implementation

  • Project Implementation 2. The Borrower shall:

  • Examination of Implementation 1. Without prejudice to the procedures set out in Article 188 (Compensation), once the period of time set out in paragraph 3 of Article 186 (Implementation of the Report) has expired, and there is disagreement between the disputing Parties as to the existence or consistency of the measures taken to comply with the Panel report, such dispute shall be referred to the original Panel wherever possible. If not possible, the procedure pursuant to Article 179 (Panel Selection) shall be followed to appoint a new Panel, in which event the periods set out thereof shall be reduced by half (22). 2. This Panel shall issue its report on the matter within 60 days after the date of the referral of the matter to it. When the Panel considers that it cannot provide its report within this timeframe, it shall inform the Parties in writing of the reasons for the delay together with an estimate of the period within which it will submit its report. Any delay shall not exceed a further period of 30 days unless the Parties otherwise agree.

  • Project Scope The physical scope of the Project shall be limited to only those capital improvements as described in Appendix A of this Agreement. In the event that circumstances require a change in such physical scope, the change must be approved by the District Committee, recorded in the District Committee's official meeting minutes, and provided to the OPWC Director for the execution of an amendment to this Agreement.

  • Laboratory Testing All laboratories selected by UPS Freight for analyzing Controlled Substances Testing will be HHS certified.

  • Construction Activities Please list all major construction activities, both planned and completed, to be performed by Seller or the EPC Contractor. Activity EPC Contractor / Subcontractor Completion Date __/__/____ (expected / actual) __/__/____ (expected / actual)

  • Implementation Services The Company and the Client have developed a plan for implementing the services to be provided hereunder, including with respect to the transition of responsibility for such services from the Client and its current administrator to the Company, which plan attached hereto as Schedule I (the “Implementation Plan”). The Company shall perform the services required to complete the Implementation Plan, as set forth therein (the “Implementation Services”). The Company and the Client shall comply with any applicable requirements agreed in the Implementation Plan.

  • Project Implementation Manual The Recipient, through the PCU, shall: (i) take all action required to carry out Parts 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 2, 3.1(b), 3.2, 3.3 and 4 (ii) of the Project in accordance with the provisions and requirements set forth or referred to in the Project Implementation Manual; (ii) submit recommendations to the Association for its consideration for changes and updates of the Project Implementation Manual as they may become necessary or advisable during Project implementation in order to achieve the objective of Parts 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 2, 3.1(b), 3.2, 3.3 and 4(ii) of the Project; and (iii) not assign, amend, abrogate or waive the Project Implementation Manual or any of its provisions without the Association’s prior agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if any of the provisions of the Project Implementation Manual is inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail and govern.

  • Implementation Report Within 120 days after the Effective Date, Xxxxxxxx shall submit a written report to OIG summarizing the status of its implementation of the requirements of this CIA (Implementation Report). The Implementation Report shall, at a minimum, include:

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • Contract Changes Changes may not be made in the terms and conditions of this contract without the agreement and written permission of the Director of Housing.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.