Common use of Clustering Clause in Contracts

Clustering. There seems to be potential for exchange at some level between MRG and most GC-funded projects. However, we believe that the best opportunity for fruitful scientific interchange is clearly with projects where type systems play a central role, as in MRG (see workpackages 4, 5 and 7). These projects are: ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇, MYTHS and PROFUNDIS. Possibilities for cross-fertilization include common workshops and invitation of observers to project work- shops. We would also be interested to have some MRG workshops and project meetings in com- mon with other GC-funded projects to reduce the overhead of organizing meetings. This makes most sense for projects having partners in Edinburgh (DART, DEGAS) or Munich (AGILE) since these are the planned locations of MRG workshops and meetings. For increased visibility, we would like to join the MRG final workshop with other GC- funded project workshops. A single event for all these projects would probably be too large to be practical; one possibility is to organize several workshops, with one involving the projects in the “types” cluster suggested above.

Appears in 2 contracts

Sources: Shared Cost RTD Contract, Shared Cost RTD Contract