Changes and Review Procedure Sample Clauses

POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Changes and Review Procedure. Alberta Innovates expects the Applicant to fulfill the Project as described in the portions of the Application that were approved by Alberta Innovates and in this Investment Agreement, and to set reasonable Milestone Start Dates and Milestone End Dates, anticipating times during the Project Period when setbacks or unavoidable delays may occur. Should an unforeseen exceptional circumstance arise whereby it is not possible to meet the deliverables or deadlines set out in any Milestone, or whereby the Applicant may desire Alberta Innovates to approve a material change to the Project, the Applicant may request a change or amendment to this Investment Agreement by contacting Alberta Innovates’ representative for project matters set out in Article 12 Notices no later than two (2) weeks prior to the next Milestone End Date. Depending on the nature and extent of the requested Project change, Alberta Innovates may require the Applicant to complete and provide a formal scope change request on an Alberta Innovates Template before Alberta Innovates will consider the request. Examples of Project change requests that require approval from Alberta Innovates Include the following: (a) an increase or decrease in the Investment associated with a particular Milestone, or the Project as a whole; (b) a material change in the scope of the Project; (c) a change in a Milestone Start Date or Milestone End Date (irrespective of any impact on the Project Completion Date); (d) acceptance of a Change of Control of the Applicant (unless the Applicant is a Post-secondary Institution, the Alberta Centre for Advanced MNP Products (ACAMP), a municipality, or part of the Government of Canada or Government of Alberta Including any ministry, department, agency, or Crown corporation, in which case no amendment is required regarding a Change of Control); (e) if the Project is being conducted pursuant to one of the Associates Programs or Voucher Programs, the appointment of a different Associate or Service Provider, respectively; (f) if the Project has a Principal Investigator, and if the Applicant’s internal policies and arrangements with the Principal Investigator would allow it to appoint a different Principal Investigator, the appointment of a different Principal Investigator; (g) a change in funding from a Funding Partner; or (h) any other material changes as determined by Alberta Innovates. Upon review of the change request, Alberta Innovates may Elect to approve, decline, or request furth...
View SourceView Similar (27)
Changes and Review Procedure. Alberta Innovates expects the Applicant to set reasonable Milestone start and completion dates, anticipating times during the Term of the Project when setbacks or unavoidable delays may occur. Should an unforeseen circumstance arise whereby it is not possible to meet the deliverables set out in a particular Milestone, the Applicant may request an amendment to the Investment Agreement by contacting Alberta Innovates’ representative set out in ARTICLE 6 below no later than two (2) weeks prior to the next Milestone completion date. Changes may include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) an increase or decrease in the Investment associated with a particular Milestone, or the Project as a whole; (ii) a proposed change in the scope of the Project; (iii) a delay in the completion of a Milestone, irrespective of any impact on the Project Completion Date; (iv) a Change in Control of the Applicant; or (v) any other changes as determined by Alberta Innovates. Upon review of the request, Alberta Innovates may, at its sole and unfettered discretion, approve, decline or request further information concerning the change. Should a change be approved by Alberta Innovates, the remainder of the Investment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unamended. Depending on the nature of the change, Alberta Innovates may require the Parties to execute an amendment to the Investment Agreement or by notice to all Parties that a new Milestone, Reporting & Payment Schedule D has been approved. If the requested change is declined, the Applicant may either elect to proceed with the Project as previously approved by Alberta Innovates or terminate the Investment Agreement, in which case no further payments from the Investment will be provided.
View SourceView Similar (29)
Changes and Review Procedure. Alberta Innovates expects the Applicant to set reasonable Milestone start and completion dates, anticipating times during the Term of the Project when setbacks or unavoidable delays may occur. Should an unforeseen circumstance arise whereby it is not possible to meet the deliverables set out in Schedule C, the Applicant may request an amendment to the Investment Agreement by contacting Alberta Innovates’ representative set out in ARTICLE 7 below. Changes may include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) a decrease in the Investment due to the departure of the Associate for any reason; (ii) illness or other leave of absence of the Associate; (iv) a Change in Control of the Applicant; or (v) any other changes as determined by Alberta Innovates. Upon review of the request, Alberta Innovates may, at its sole and unfettered discretion, approve, decline or request further information concerning the change. Should a change be approved by Alberta Innovates, the remainder of the Investment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unamended. Depending on the nature of the change, Alberta Innovates may require the Parties to execute an amendment to the Investment Agreement or by notice to all Parties that a new Schedule C has been approved. If the requested change is declined, the Applicant may either elect to proceed with the Project as previously approved by Alberta Innovates or terminate the Investment Agreement, in which case no further payments from the Investment will be provided.
View SourceView Similar (6)
Changes and Review Procedure. Alberta Innovates expects the Applicant and Service Provider to set reasonable Project start and completion dates, anticipating times during the Term of the Project when setbacks or unavoidable delays may occur. Should an unforeseen circumstance arise whereby it is not possible to meet the Project Completion Date, the Applicant and Service Provider may request an amendment to the Investment Agreement by contacting Alberta Innovates’ representative set out in ARTICLE 6 below no later than two
View SourceView Similar (4)
Changes and Review Procedure. Alberta Innovates expects the Alberta Applicant to set reasonable Milestone start and completion dates, anticipating times during the Term of the Project when setbacks or unavoidable delays may occur. Should an unforeseen circumstance arise whereby it is not possible to meet the deliverables set out in a particular Milestone, the Alberta Applicant may request an amendment to the Investment Agreement by contacting Alberta Innovates’ representative set out in ARTICLE 6 below no later than two (2) weeks prior to the next Milestone completion date. Changes may include, but are not limited to, the following:
View SourceView Similar (3)
Changes and Review Procedure. Alberta Innovates expects the Applicant to set reasonable Milestone start and completion dates, anticipating times during the Term of the Project when setbacks or unavoidable delays may occur. Should an unforeseen circumstance arise whereby it is not possible to meet the deliverables set out in a particular Milestone, the Applicant may request an amendment to the Investment Agreement by contacting Alberta Innovates’ representative set out in Error! Reference source not found. below no later than two (2) weeks prior to the next Milestone completion date. Changes may include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) an increase or decrease in the Investment associated with a particular Milestone, or the Project as a whole; (ii) a proposed change in the scope of the Project;
View SourceView Similar (2)
Changes and Review Procedure. Alberta Innovates expects the SME Applicant and Testing Site Applicant to set reasonable Milestone start and completion dates, anticipating times during the Term of the Project when setbacks or unavoidable delays may occur. Should an unforeseen circumstance arise whereby it is not possible to meet the deliverables set out in a particular Milestone, the SME Applicant and Testing Site Applicant may request an amendment to the Investment Agreement by contacting Alberta Innovates’ representative set out in ARTICLE 6 below no later than two (2) weeks prior to the next Milestone completion date. Changes may include, but are not limited to the following: (i) an increase or decrease in the Investment associated with a particular Milestone, or the Project as a whole; (ii) a proposed change in the scope of the Project;
View SourceView Similar (2)
Changes and Review Procedure. Alberta Innovates expects the Alberta Applicant to set reasonable Milestone start and completion dates, anticipating times during the term of the Project when setbacks or unavoidable delays may occur. Should an unforeseen circumstance arise whereby it is not possible to meet the deliverables set out in a particular Milestone, the Alberta Applicant may request an amendment to the Investment Agreement by contacting Alberta Innovates’ representative set out in ARTICLE 6 below. Changes may include, but are not limited to the following: (i) an increase or decrease in the Investment associated with a particular Milestone, or the Project as a whole; (ii) a proposed change in the scope of the Project;
View Source
Changes and Review Procedure. The Funders expect the Applicant and Industry Partner to set reasonable Milestone start and completion dates as set out above, anticipating times during the term of the Project when setbacks or unavoidable delays may occur. Should an unforeseen circumstance arise whereby it is not possible to meet the deliverable set out in a particular Milestone, the Applicant and Industry Partner may request an Amendment to the Investment Agreement by contacting the Funders’ representatives set out in ARTICLE 6 below. Changes may include, but are not limited to the following: (i) an increase or decrease in the Investment associated with a particular Milestone, or the Project as a whole; (ii) a proposed change in the scope of the Project; (iii) a delay in the completion of a Milestone, irrespective of any impact on the Project Completion Date; (iv) a Change in Control of the Applicant or the Industry Partner; or (v) any other changes as determined by the Funders. Upon review of the request, the Funders may, at their sole and unfettered discretion, approve, decline or request further information concerning the change. Should an amendment be approved by the Funders, all other terms and conditions of the Investment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. If the requested change is declined, the Applicant and Industry Partner may either elect to proceed with the Project as previously approved by the Funders or terminate the Investment Agreement, in which case no further payments from the Investment will be provided.
View Source

Related to Changes and Review Procedure

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • Review Procedures a. In consultation with the Illinois SHPO, NRCS shall identify those undertakings with little to no potential to affect historic properties and list those undertakings in Appendix A. Upon the determination by the CRS that a proposed undertaking is included in Appendix A, the NRCS is not required to consult further with the SHPO for that undertaking. A list of undertakings with the potential to affect historic properties comprises Appendix B. b. The lists of undertakings provided in Appendices A and B may be modified through consultation and written agreement between the NRCS State Conservationist and the SHPO without requiring an amendment to this Illinois Prototype Agreement. The NRCS State Office will maintain the master list and will provide an updated list to all consulting parties with an explanation of the rationale for classifying the practices accordingly. c. Undertakings identified in Appendix B shall require further review as outlined in Stipulation V. a. The NRCS shall consult with the SHPO to define the undertaking’s APE, identify and evaluate historic properties that may be affected by the undertaking, assess potential effects, and identify strategies for resolving adverse effects prior to implementing the undertaking. 1) NRCS may provide its proposed APE, identification of historic properties and/or scope of identification efforts, and assessment of effects in a single transmittal to the SHPO, provided this documentation meets the substantive standards in 36 CFR Part 800.4-5 and 800.11. 2) The NRCS shall attempt to avoid adverse effects to historic properties whenever possible; where historic properties are located in the APE, NRCS shall describe how it proposes to modify, buffer, or move the undertaking to avoid adverse effects to historic properties. 3) Where the NRCS proposes a finding of "no historic properties affected" or "no adverse effect" to historic properties, the SHPO shall have 30 calendar days from receipt of this documented description and information to review it and provide comments. The NRCS shall take into account all timely comments. i. If the SHPO, or another consulting party, disagrees with NRCS' findings and/or determination, it shall notify the NRCS within the thirty (30) calendar daytime period. The NRCS shall consult with the SHPO or other consulting party to attempt to resolve the disagreement. If the disagreement cannot be resolved through this consultation, NRCS shall follow the dispute resolution process in Stipulation VIII below. ii. If the SHPO does not respond to the NRCS within the thirty (30) calendar day period and/or the NRCS receives no objections from other consulting parties, or if the SHPO concurs with the NRCS' determination and proposed actions to avoid adverse effects, the NRCS shall document the concurrence/lack of response within the review time noted above and may move forward with the undertaking. 4) Where a proposed undertaking may adversely affect historic properties, NRCS shall describe proposed measures to minimize or mitigate the adverse effects, and follow the process in 36 CFR Part 800.6, including consultation with other consulting patties and notification to the ACHP, to develop a Memorandum of Agreement to resolve the adverse effects. Should the proposed undertaking have the potential to adversely affect a known NHL, the NRCS shall, to the maximum extent possible, undertake such planning and actions that may be necessary to minimize harm to the NHL in accordance with 54 U.S.C. § 306107 of the NHPA and 36 CFR Part 800.6 and 800.10, including consultation with the ACHP and respective National Park Service, Regional National Historic Landmark Program Coordinator, to develop a Memorandum of Agreement. d. NRCS will conduct archaeological surveys and will submit reports and other documentation to SHPO for review and comment. When no archaeological sites have been located by the archaeological survey, NRCS may proceed with the proposed undertaking. Reports for negative surveys must be submitted to SHPO on a quarterly basis. All positive and negative reports submitted to SHPO will be sent digitally for submission to the Inventory of Illinois Archaeological Sites (IAS) data file maintained by staff at the Illinois State Museum (ISM) housed under the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR). The NRCS further agrees that access to specific site location data will be restricted to the CRS, the NRCS field personnel installing conservation practices adjacent to the cultural resource, and the landowner. Specific site location information for individual projects will be maintained in a secure cultural resources file kept in the field offices and will not be available to the public. e. Curation: NRCS personnel will not collect artifactual material during routine field inspections. However, if a professional survey, evaluation testing, or mitigation is required, NRCS shall ensure that all materials and records resulting from cultural resources surveys or data recovery activities on federal or state property are curated by the Illinois State Museum. The NRCS shall ensure that all records resulting from cultural resource surveys or data recovery activities on private property are curated by the Illinois State Museum or an equivalent curation facility in accordance with 36 CFR Part 79. Subject to the landowner's permission, all objects resulting from cultural resources surveys or data recovery activities are maintained by the Illinois State Museum or equivalent research institution until their analysis is complete and they are returned to their owner(s). Although landowners will be encouraged to donate artifactual material, it is understood that objects collected on private land remain the property of the landowner(s) unless the landowner(s) donates the material to the Illinois State Museum or equivalent research institution. This excludes burial goods, as stipulated by ▇▇▇▇▇▇.

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES A. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by AGREEMENT, shall be reviewed by LOCAL AGENCY’S Chief Financial Officer. B. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days after issuance of the final audit report, CONSULTANT may request a review by LOCAL AGENCY’S Chief Financial Officer of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing. C. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by LOCAL AGENCY will excuse CONSULTANT from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. D. CONSULTANT and subconsultant AGREEMENTs, including cost proposals and Indirect Cost Rates (ICR), may be subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, an AGREEMENT audit, an incurred cost audit, an ICR Audit, or a CPA ICR audit work paper review. If selected for audit or review, the AGREEMENT, cost proposal and ICR and related work papers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR audit work paper review it is CONSULTANT’s responsibility to ensure federal, LOCAL AGENCY, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA’s work papers including making copies as necessary. The AGREEMENT, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by CONSULTANT and approved by LOCAL AGENCY Contract Administrator to conform to the audit or review recommendations. CONSULTANT agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the AGREEMENT by this reference if directed by LOCAL AGENCY at its sole discretion. Refusal by CONSULTANT to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, LOCAL AGENCY or local governments have access to CPA work papers, will be considered a breach of AGREEMENT terms and cause for termination of the AGREEMENT and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs. E. CONSULTANT’s Cost Proposal may be subject to a CPA ICR Audit Work Paper Review and/or audit by the Independent Office of Audits and Investigations (IOAI). IOAI, at its sole discretion, may review and/or audit and approve the CPA ICR documentation. The Cost Proposal shall be adjusted by the CONSULTANT and approved by the LOCAL AGENCY Contract Administrator to conform to the Work Paper Review recommendations included in the management letter or audit recommendations included in the audit report. Refusal by the CONSULTANT to incorporate the Work Paper Review recommendations included in the management letter or audit recommendations included in the audit report will be considered a breach of the AGREEMENT terms and cause for termination of the AGREEMENT and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs. 1. During IOAI’s review of the ICR audit work papers created by the CONSULTANT’s independent CPA, IOAI will work with the CPA and/or CONSULTANT toward a resolution of issues that arise during the review. Each party agrees to use its best efforts to resolve any audit disputes in a timely manner. If IOAI identifies significant issues during the review and is unable to issue a cognizant approval letter, LOCAL AGENCY will reimburse the CONSULTANT at an accepted ICR until a FAR (Federal Acquisition Regulation) compliant ICR {e.g. 48 CFR Part 31; GAGAS (Generally Accepted Auditing Standards); CAS (Cost Accounting Standards), if applicable; in accordance with procedures and guidelines of the American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Audit Guide; and other applicable procedures and guidelines}is received and approved by IOAI. Accepted rates will be as follows: a. If the proposed rate is less than one hundred fifty percent (150%) - the accepted rate reimbursed will be ninety percent (90%) of the proposed rate. b. If the proposed rate is between one hundred fifty percent (150%) and two hundred percent (200%) - the accepted rate will be eighty-five percent (85%) of the proposed rate. c. If the proposed rate is greater than two hundred percent (200%) - the accepted rate will be seventy-five percent (75%) of the proposed rate. 2. If IOAI is unable to issue a cognizant letter per paragraph E.1. above, IOAI may require CONSULTANT to submit a revised independent CPA-audited ICR and audit report within three (3) months of the effective date of the management letter. IOAI will then have up to six (6) months to review the CONSULTANT’s and/or the independent CPA’s revisions. 3. If the CONSULTANT fails to comply with the provisions of this paragraph E, or if IOAI is still unable to issue a cognizant approval letter after the revised independent CPA audited ICR is submitted, overhead cost reimbursement will be limited to the accepted ICR that was established upon initial rejection of the ICR and set forth in paragraph E.1. above for all rendered services. In this event, this accepted ICR will become the actual and final ICR for reimbursement purposes under this AGREEMENT. 4. CONSULTANT may submit to LOCAL AGENCY final invoice only when all of the following items have occurred: (1) IOAI accepts or adjusts the original or revised independent CPA audited ICR;

  • Claims and Review Procedures 6.1 For all claims other than Disability benefits:

  • Claims and Review Procedure In the event that any claim for benefits that must initially be submitted in writing to the Board of Directors, is denied (in whole or in part) hereunder, the claimant shall receive from First Charter a notice of denial in writing within 60 days, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for denial, with specific reference to pertinent provisions of this Supplemental Agreement. Any disagreements about such interpretations and construction shall be submitted to an arbitrator subject to the rules and procedures established by the American Arbitration Association. The arbitrator shall be acceptable to both First Charter and the Executive (or Beneficiary); if the parties cannot agree on a single arbitrator, the disagreement shall be heard by a panel of three arbitrators, with each party to appoint one arbitrator and the third to be chosen by the other two. No member of the Board of Directors shall be liable to any person for any action taken under Article VIII except those actions undertaken with lack of good faith.