Common use of Billing Criteria for Fires that Merge Clause in Contracts

Billing Criteria for Fires that Merge. ‌ An incident-specific cost apportionment agreement should be considered for allocating costs between fires that involve multiple jurisdictions and have merged (burned together). See ICS- 209 and agency final fire reports directions for reporting requirements and reference NWCG Memo EB-M-11-014 (xxxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx/memos/eb-m-11-014) for additional considerations. By default, when wildfires merge, costs for each fire will be maintained independently and will be apportioned as described in Clause 38.a above.

Appears in 3 contracts

Samples: 2015 Alaska, Response Agreement, fire.ak.blm.gov

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Billing Criteria for Fires that Merge. ‌ An incident-specific cost apportionment agreement should be considered for allocating costs between fires that involve multiple jurisdictions and have merged (burned together). (See ICS- 209 and agency final fire reports directions for reporting requirements and reference NWCG Memo EB-M-11-014 (xxxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx/memos/eb-m-11-014) at xxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx/memos/eb-m-11-014 for additional considerations. .) By default, when wildfires merge, costs for each fire will be maintained independently and will be apportioned as described in Clause 38.a above.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: fire.ak.blm.gov

Billing Criteria for Fires that Merge. ‌ An incident-specific cost apportionment agreement should be considered for allocating costs between fires that involve multiple jurisdictions and have merged (burned together). (See ICS- 209 and agency final fire reports directions for reporting requirements and reference NWCG Memo EB-M-11-014 (xxxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx/memos/eb-m-11-014) at xxxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx/memos/eb-m-11-014 for additional considerations. .) By default, when wildfires merge, costs for each fire will be maintained independently and will be apportioned as described in Clause 38.a above.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: fire.ak.blm.gov

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Billing Criteria for Fires that Merge. An incident-specific cost apportionment agreement should be considered for allocating costs between fires that involve multiple jurisdictions and have merged (burned together). See ICS- 209 and agency final fire reports directions for reporting requirements and reference NWCG Memo EB-M-11-014 (xxxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx/memos/eb-m-11-014) for additional considerations. By default, when wildfires merge, costs for each fire will be maintained independently and will be apportioned as described in Clause 38.a above.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: 2015 Alaska

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.