Common use of ARGUMENT Clause in Contracts

ARGUMENT. THE STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court reviews the district court's granting of the preliminary injunction under an "abuse of discretion standard." ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RET. HEALTH SYS. OF OHIO, 160 F.3d 310, 312 (6th Cir. 1998). Such injunctions "will seldom be disturbed unless the district court relied upon clearly erroneous findings of fact, improperly applied the governing law, or used an erroneous legal standard. ID. (citing BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD MUT. OF OHIO V. BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD ASS'N, 110 F.3d 318, 322 (6th Cir. 1997)). Appellate courts afford district courts' decisions to grant preliminary injunctions "great deference," BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD MUT. OF OHIO, 110 F.3d at 322, and "will reverse a district court's balancing of the equities only in the rarest of circumstances." ▇▇▇▇▇▇, 160 F.3d at 313. As shown below, the district court properly granted SPG's motion for a preliminary injunction.

ARGUMENT. THE STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court reviews the district court's granting of the preliminary injunction under an "abuse of discretion standard." ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RET. HEALTH SYS. OF OHIO, 160 F.3d 310, 312 (6th Cir. 1998). Such injunctions "will seldom be disturbed unless the district court relied upon clearly erroneous findings of fact, improperly applied the governing law, or used an erroneous legal standard. ID. (citing BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD MUT. OF OHIO V. v. BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD ASS'N, 110 F.3d 318, 322 (6th Cir. 1997)). Appellate courts afford district courts' decisions to grant preliminary injunctions "great deference," BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD MUT. OF OHIO, 110 F.3d at 322, and "will reverse a district court's balancing of the equities only in the rarest of circumstances." ▇▇▇▇▇▇, 160 F.3d at 313. As shown below, the district court properly granted SPG's motion for a preliminary injunction.

ARGUMENT. THE STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court reviews the district court's granting of the preliminary injunction under an "abuse of discretion standard." ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. V. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RET. HEALTH SYS. OF OHIO, 160 F.3d 310, 312 (6th Cir. 1998). Such injunctions "will seldom be disturbed unless the district court relied upon clearly erroneous findings of fact, improperly applied the governing law, or used an erroneous legal standard. ID. (citing BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD MUT. OF OHIO V. BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD ASS'N, 110 F.3d 318, 322 (6th Cir. 1997)). Appellate courts afford district courts' decisions to grant preliminary injunctions "great deference," BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD MUT. OF OHIO, 110 F.3d at 322, and "will reverse a district court's balancing of the equities only in the rarest of circumstances." ▇▇▇▇▇▇, 160 F.3d at 313. As shown below, the district court properly granted SPG's motion for a preliminary injunction.