Application Narrative Clause Samples

The Application Narrative clause defines the section of a contract or agreement where the applicant provides a detailed description of their proposed project, program, or activity. This narrative typically outlines objectives, methods, timelines, and expected outcomes, serving as the substantive basis for evaluating the application. By requiring a clear and comprehensive narrative, this clause ensures that decision-makers have sufficient information to assess the feasibility and merit of the proposal, thereby promoting transparency and informed decision-making.
Application Narrative. The project narrative is the primary document that will be evaluated and scored by the review panel. The proposal summary for each awarded proposal will be linked to the FGDC website. A total value of 100 points is possible. Please limit narrative to 5 pages (not including letters of support, tables, maps, and diagrams). Proposal Summary (0 points). List the applicant organization, collaborating organization (including letters of support), names and resumes of expert staff, contact information, and a concise description of the project (limit to 200 words). Project Scope (45 points). Describe the project, strategies for completing the work, and perspectives on the value of the project. Identify possible barriers to completion, and strategies for overcoming such barriers. Strategies will be evaluated on how well they identify the capacity for completing a high-value project. Describe the specific decision-making processes that will be addressed by this proposal. Expertise and Management Capacity (30 points). Outline the expertise of the participants and their unique contributions to the project, including familiarity with Federal programs. Identify the key management personnel and how these persons will ensure timely results and completion of the project. Each participant should have a clear value-added role in the strategies above. There is no set number for participants. Resources (25 points). Describe the resources of the organizations, including technological and manpower resources that can be used to optimize the results. Identify the advantage of the collaboration in terms of complementary resources. Collaboration between academic specialization and Federal program expertise is important for ensuring a broad knowledge of geography and the ultimate audience of Federal program managers. Larger in-kind match will earn a higher score.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Application Narrative. The project narrative is the primary document that will be evaluated and scored by the review panel. The Proposal Summary for each awarded proposal will be linked from the FGDC website. A total point value of 100 points is possible. Please limit narrative to 5 pages (not including letters of support, tables, maps, and diagrams). Applicants are encouraged to work with their State’s USGS Geospatial Liaison to develop proposals. For a listing of Liaisons please see ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/crreps/faces/crreps.jspx . Please submit narratives that are clear and concise. Your planned activities should be easily understood.
View Source
Application Narrative. The Application Narrative is a more detailed document that expands upon and details the roles, responsibilities and tasks agreed upon in the Scope of Work Checklist. The Participating Tribe’s [INSERT DATE] Application Narrative, incorporated herein, describes the requirements, anticipated deliverables, tasks, costs, and other appropriate, specific details of activities to be undertaken with the funds provided through this Cooperative Agreement. The Buy-Back Program approves this Application Narrative, in accordance with the terms and conditions stated herein, with the following exceptions, additions, and clarifications: i. In order to facilitate informed decision making by landowners, the Participating Tribe will disseminate brochures and materials created by the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Office of the Special Trustee for American Indians regarding the American Indian Probate Reform Act of 2004 (AIPRA). ii. The funding provided by this Cooperative Agreement may not be utilized for actual will-writing, estate-planning, or other similar activities. Outreach may include the dissemination of Department of the Interior-provided information to Owners regarding the following key background topics related to land consolidation; fractionation, AIPRA, life estates, gift deeds, implications of passing away without a written will, and probate. This will facilitate informed decision making by Owners in relation to offers from the Buy-Back Program. iii. The Buy-Back Program currently estimates sending purchase offers to Owners in iv. If the Participating Tribe recommends offers to be made for interests in tracts with unleased improvements, the Participating Tribe must pass a timely Tribal Resolution (or take equivalent action under the Participating Tribe’s normal operating procedure) stating that “the [Participating Tribe] requests tracts with improvements be included in the offer set and that the [Participating Tribe] will afford landowners occupying any tracts acquired via the Buy-Back Program the opportunity for a lease if one is not in place already.”
View Source
Application Narrative. Statement on Equity and Environmental Justice (250 words max) Local Priorities/Needs and Targeted Outreach (1000 words max)
View Source
Application Narrative. The Application Narrative is a more detailed document that expands upon and details the roles, responsibilities and tasks agreed upon in the Scope of Work Checklist. The Participating Tribe’s [INSERT DATE] Application Narrative, incorporated herein, describes the requirements, anticipated deliverables, tasks, costs, and other appropriate, specific details of activities to be undertaken with the funds provided through this Cooperative Agreement. The Buy-Back Program approves this Application Narrative, in accordance with the terms and conditions stated herein, with the following exceptions, additions, and clarifications: i. In order to facilitate informed decision making by landowners, the Participating Tribe will disseminate brochures and materials created by the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Office of the Special Trustee for American Indians regarding the American Indian Probate Reform Act of 2004 (AIPRA). ii. The Buy-Back Program currently estimates sending purchase offers to Owners in iii. If the Participating Tribe recommends offers to be made for interests in tracts with unleased improvements, the Participating Tribe must pass a timely Tribal Resolution (or take equivalent action under the Participating Tribe’s normal operating procedure) stating that “the [Participating Tribe] requests tracts with improvements be included in the offer set and that the [Participating Tribe] will afford landowners occupying any tracts acquired via the Buy-Back Program the opportunity for a lease if one is not in place already.”
View Source
Application Narrative. The Application Narrative is a more detailed document that expands upon and details the roles, responsibilities and tasks agreed upon in the Scope of Work Checklist. The Participating Tribe’s [INSERT DATE] Application Narrative, incorporated herein, describes the requirements, anticipated deliverables, tasks, costs, and other appropriate, specific details of activities to be undertaken with the funds provided through this Cooperative Agreement. i. The Buy-Back Program currently estimates sending purchase offers to Owners in
View Source
Application Narrative. The project narrative is the primary document that will be evaluated and scored by the review panel. Proposal Summary for each awarded proposal will be linked from the FGDC website. Total point value of 100 points possible. Please limit to 5 pages (not including letters of support, tables, maps, budget, and diagrams):
View Source

Related to Application Narrative

  • Narrative Commentary covering site improvements, circulation, organization of building space in relation to program requirements, building materials, special features, building systems (HVAC, plumbing, fire protection, structural, security, and video voice and data).

  • FORMAT AND CONTENT FOR REGISTRY OPERATOR MONTHLY REPORTING Registry Operator shall provide one set of monthly reports per gTLD, using the API described in draft-­‐▇▇▇▇▇▇-­‐icann-­‐registry-­‐interfaces, see Specification 2, Part A, Section 9, reference 5, with the following content. ICANN may request in the future that the reports be delivered by other means and using other formats. ICANN will use reasonable commercial efforts to preserve the confidentiality of the information reported until three (3) months after the end of the month to which the reports relate. Unless set forth in this Specification 3, any reference to a specific time refers to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). Monthly reports shall consist of data that reflects the state of the registry at the end of the month (UTC).

  • Compliance Statement If a Plan Sponsor or Eligible Organization receives a compliance statement under VCP, the compliance statement is binding upon the Service and the Plan Sponsor or Eligible Organization as provided in section 10.09.

  • Servicer Compliance Statement On or before March 1 of each calendar year, commencing in 2007, the Servicer shall deliver to the Owner and any Depositor a statement of compliance addressed to the Owner and such Depositor and signed by an authorized officer of the Servicer, to the effect that (i) a review of the Servicer’s activities during the immediately preceding calendar year (or applicable portion thereof) and of its performance under this Agreement and any applicable Reconstitution Agreement during such period has been made under such officer’s supervision, and (ii) to the best of such officers’ knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement and any applicable Reconstitution Agreement in all material respects throughout such calendar year (or applicable portion thereof) or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, specifically identifying each such failure known to such officer and the nature and the status thereof.

  • Project Monitoring by the State The State may conduct on-site or off-site monitoring reviews of the Project during the term of this Grant Agreement and for up to ninety (90) days after it expires or is otherwise terminated. The Grantee shall extend its full cooperation and give full access to the Project site and to relevant documentation to the State or its authorized designees for the purpose of determining, among other things: A. whether Project activities are consistent with those set forth in Exhibit A, the Grant Application, and the terms and conditions of the Grant Agreement; B. the actual expenditure of state, local and/or private funds expended to date on the Project is in conformity with the amounts for each Budget line item as set forth in Exhibit B and that unpaid costs have been properly accrued; C. that Grantee is making timely progress with the Project, and that its project management, financial management and control systems, procurement systems and methods, and overall performance are in conformance with the requirements set forth in this Grant Agreement and are fully and accurately reflected in Project reports submitted to the State.