Application Assessment Clause Samples

Application Assessment. Applications for Educational Leave shall be assessed by the Sabbatical and Educational Leave Committee based on the following criteria: 20.11.6.1 the anticipated significance and relevance of the proposed program of study to both the applicant and the University; 20.11.6.2 the feasibility of concluding the program of study; 20.11.6.3 confirmation that the program of study cannot be completed while maintaining employment workload; 20.11.6.4 achievement of Faculty Objectives and Responsibilities as described in Article 13.

Application Assessment. When assessing the repayment ability of consumers the creditors should :

Application Assessment. When assessing the repayment ability of consumers the creditors should : (i) Assess the completeness of the financial information submitted by the consumer, and (ii) critically assess the reasonableness of the data presented in the financial information submitted by the consumer. (i) The credit analysts have the responsibility of performing a thorough assessment of the financial situation of the consumer and to clearly justify their proposal to approve or decline the application for granting credit. (ii) The credit analysts and the credit approving authorities must take into account the creditor’s credit policy, the creditor’s risk appetite, concentration limits and risk diversification efforts, as well as the relevant directives and circulars issued by the Central Bank. (iii) The credit analysts and the credit approving authorities, when assessing a credit application must:

Application Assessment. All applications will be assessed based on the application criteria outlined in section 5 below. eSafety may contact an applicant during the assessment process to request additional information or to clarify aspects of an application. Upon satisfying the assessment criteria and all other mandatory requirements, a successful TEP candidate will be invited to participate in an online CoP session. These will be held a minimum of four times per financial year to align with eSafety’s assessment periods. TEP candidates are encouraged to make provision for all of their presenters and/or content developers to attend CoP sessions. However, they may also choose to be represented by one person only. That person must have the ability to influence TEP program content and contribute to CoP discussions. That person should also be able to both update the CoP on recent observations/trends relating to online safety or their programs and report back within their organisation on the content of the CoP.

Application Assessment. Applications shall be assessed based on the following criteria: 21.08.1 the merit of the proposed project, program of work or study; 21.08.2 the anticipated significance of the proposed project, program of work or study to both the applicant and the University; 21.08.3 the feasibility of engaging in the project, program of work or study, as described; 21.08.4 achievement of Faculty Objectives and Responsibilities as described in Article 13. 21.08.5 the length of time since the faculty member’s last sabbatical. Faculty who have not received a sabbatical for more than six years will be prioritized.

Application Assessment. (a) An administrative eligibility check is performed immediately after the end of the Call of Application by the Coordinating Institution, or by the Japanese Coordinating Institution for TUT students applying through the Japanese Coordinating Institution. This eligibility check covers: a. respect of application deadline; b. completeness of the application file; c. eligibility of the candidate in relation to the EMJMD/▇▇▇▇▇ criteria. Ineligible applicants will be notified of the outcome. (b) An academic eligibility check is performed by the Coordinating Institution (Academic Coordinator). (c) Complete eligible applications will be evaluated by IMLEX Academic and Management Board members, grading each criterion for each application. The selection criteria are: (d) Best applications are moderated by all Local Academic Coordinators of the Full Partners, using the same criteria and weighting system. (e) The final selection is agreed during an Academic and Management Board by full consensus of the four (4) Local Academic Coordinators on the basis of pre-evaluation and academic evaluation grades. Selection outcome and final rank is not based only on the averaged grade, but reflect the discussion and agreement of the Academic and Management Board. Similarly, the final selection of TUT nominees will also be agreed during the Board meeting. In the meeting, the following lists are defined: • a main list (best ranked successful applicants with an EMJMD scholarship or ▇▇▇▇▇/TUT financial support) and; • a reserve list (successful applicants with a Consortium scholarship and successful applicants without scholarships). (f) Final selection results will be sent to all applicants by email. a. a model of the Student Agreement; b. links to online guidelines and information on the Programme and to prepare arrival in Finland; c. Procedure to confirm participation, guidelines and deadlines for confirmation and inception of visa procedures; d. EMJMD/▇▇▇▇▇ scholarship attribution (and applicable amount); e. Academic / linguistic level of competence expected from the Students prior and during the f. Consortium scholarship attribution; g. information regarding the management / use of the reserve list (in case of drop-out of Students in the main list); h. the procedure to follow far an appeal to the selection decision in accordance with the terms laid down in article III.4.6. (g) Non selected applicants will be notified by email. The email will include information on the procedure t...

Application Assessment. All Applications will be assessed by an expert panel of officers and moderated by independent industry representatives nominated by the Director General, Department of Mines and Petroleum. The panel will use the predefined assessment criteria specified in the online application. On completion of the assessment process all Applicants will be notified of the outcome of their application via email, prior to the public announcement of successful Applicants. Successful Applicants will be formally notified in writing and of the date of the compulsory briefing. There will be no right of appeal.

Application Assessment. (a) An administrative eligibility check is performed immediately after the end of the Call of Application by the Coordinating Institution. This eligibility check covers: a. respect of application deadline; b. completeness of the application file; c. eligibility of the candidate in relation to the EMJMD criteria. Ineligible applicants will be informed immediately after the eligibility check and provided with the reasons of ineligibility and the procedure to follow for an appeal to the selection decision in accordance with the terms laid down in article III.4.6. Ineligible applicants will be notified of the outcome one (1) month after the end of the Call for Application at the latest. (b) An academic eligibility check is performed by the Coordinating Institution (Academic Coordinator). Applicants who are considered not complying with minimal academic requirements will received a personalized feedback immediately after the eligibility check and provided information on the appeal procedure in accordance with the terms laid down in article III.4.6. (c) Each eligible applications are first pre-evaluated by two