Abstract. The research entitled, “The Royal Thai Police Principle of Good Governance for appointing Police Officer” aims to explore problems and obstacles in the police officers’ appointment and compare the appointment patterns during the change of command in order to propose guidelines for the police officer’s appointment. The qualitative research was conducted by collecting data from the Royal Thai Police Management and specialists in police force management, for examples, Royal Thai Police Inspector General, Deputy Commissioner-General, Assistant Commissioner, Commissioner of Personnel Office, Royal Thai Police, the Police Commission, Royal Thai Police Policy Making Board, the Civil Service Commission, and the Public Sector Development Commission. According to the research findings, representatives from the Royal Thai Police at first glance agreed that senior police whose names appeared on the rooster were dependable and suitable for appointment, but after carefully reconsidered, it seemed that some names had been selected by using the patronage system. This may initiate the complaint to the Civil Service Commission, and the Public Sector Development Commission from those who missed the promotion. In addition, the percentage of judgment criteria on the senior roster needed adjustment because it is as high as 33 percent, which should be lower to make it the most fairness judgment. Even though the police officers under the Royal Thai Police, both from the Central and Provincial Police Office agreed with selection process for senior roster and potential candidate list that were already passed fine screening, they suggested updating the application of criteria according to the filing complaints that clearly asking for revision on the potential candidate list with transparent and elaborated details that truly support the appointment. The problems and obstacles in the police officer’s appointment and guidelines for solving problems as being told during the interview with targeted group are as follows:
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Research Report
Abstract. The research entitled, “The Royal Thai Police Principle of Good Governance for appointing Police Officer” aims to explore problems and obstacles setbacks in the police officers’ appointment and compare the appointment patterns during the change of command in order to propose guidelines for the police officer’s officers’ appointment. The qualitative research was conducted by collecting data from the Royal Thai Police Management and specialists in police force management, for examples, Royal Thai Police Inspector General, Deputy Commissioner-General, Assistant Commissioner, Commissioner of Personnel Office, Royal Thai Police, the Police Commission, Royal Thai Police Policy Making Board, the Civil Service Commission, and the Public Sector Development Commission. According to the research findings, representatives from the Royal Thai Police at first glance agreed that senior police whose names appeared on the rooster were dependable and suitable for appointment, but after carefully reconsidered, it seemed that some names had been selected by using the patronage system. This may initiate the complaint to the Civil Service Commission, and the Public Sector Development Commission from those who missed the promotion. In addition, the percentage of judgment criteria on the senior roster needed adjustment because it is as high as 33 percent, which should be lower to make it the most fairness judgment. Even though the police officers under the Royal Thai Police, both from the Central and Provincial Police Office agreed with selection process for senior roster and potential candidate list that were already passed fine screening, they suggested updating the application of criteria according to the filing complaints that clearly asking for revision on the potential candidate list with transparent and elaborated details that truly support the appointment. The problems and obstacles setbacks in the police officer’s officers’ appointment and guidelines for solving problems as being told during the interview with targeted group are as follows:
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Research Report