ContractDraft Programmatic Agreement • May 5th, 2020
DRAFT PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, THE OREGON STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, THE PORT OF TILLAMOOK BAY, OREGON EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, AND THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE PORT OF TILLAMOOK BAY WHEREAS, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of the Department of Homeland Security, pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. §5121 et seq. (Stafford Act), and FEMA's implementing regulations contained in Title 44 Code of Federal Regulations Part 206 (CFR) for the Public Assistance Program; may provide funding assistance to the Port of Tillamook Bay (POTB), Tillamook County, Oregon, through Oregon Emergency Management (OEM) which administers the Program; and WHEREAS, the POTB has applied to OEM for funding assistance through FEMA's Public Assistance Program to develop and implement a number of capital improvement projects (including repairs to existi
DRAFT PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENTDraft Programmatic Agreement • May 31st, 2021
WHEREAS, historically, the low elevation and proximity of the Calcasieu, Cameron and Vermilion Parishes to the Gulf of Mexico puts these southwest coastal Louisiana communities at risk of damages from storm surge flooding and coastal erosion; and
DRAFT PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENTDraft Programmatic Agreement • March 9th, 2022
WHEREAS, the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Kansas City District (the “Corps”) plans to carry out the repurpose or demolition of the Longview Farm Garage/Apartment and Powerhouse Building and the Greenhouse Managers House (undertaking) pursuant to the 36 CFR Part 800, the regulations implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. § 306108); and
PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONGDraft Programmatic Agreement • August 31st, 2010
WHEREAS, the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) is authorized to provide assistance in the development of infrastructure in rural America under its Electric Program in accordance with the rural Electrification Act of 1936 (7 U.S.C. §§ 901-950b); and
DRAFT PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONGDraft Programmatic Agreement • December 9th, 2008
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD, ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION, ALASKA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER,
DRAFT PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENTDraft Programmatic Agreement • August 11th, 2020
WHEREAS, the United States Forest Service (FS) develops and administers the renewable resources of timber, range, water, recreation and wildlife on the national forests for multiple use and sustained yield of the products and services, pursuant to the Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act of 1960 (P.L. 86-517); and
APPENDIX L—DRAFT PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENTDraft Programmatic Agreement • June 14th, 2020
Note: The Programmatic Agreement, including the Cultural Resources Management Plan, is in draft form and is being developed in consultation with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the Alaska State Historic Preservation Office, Tribes, and other Consulting Parties in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.
DRAFT PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONGDraft Programmatic Agreement • November 30th, 2022
Potential consulting parties were identified and formally invited to be part of the Section 106 Consultation process for the Project. Many agencies and tribes accepted the invitation and others declined, such as the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians. A list of current consulting parties is below.
DRAFT PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT FOR ARCHAELOGICAL RESOURCESDraft Programmatic Agreement • July 20th, 2012
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION, THE CALIFORNIA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, ANDDraft Programmatic Agreement • February 10th, 2014
This Programmatic Agreement (“PA”) is made among the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”), the California State Historic Preservation Officer (“SHPO”), and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (“ACHP”) (referred collectively herein as the “Signatories” or individually as a “Signatory”), pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (“NHPA”), 16 United States Code (“U.S.C.”) § 470f and its implementing regulations, 36 Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”) Part 800.
AMONGDraft Programmatic Agreement • November 13th, 2017
WHEREAS, the United States Department of Energy, Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) operates and maintains, through its Desert Southwest Regional Office (DSW), an extensive electrical power delivery system throughout southern California (CA), which includes transmission lines, substations, communication sites and ancillary features; and
Draft Programmatic AgreementDraft Programmatic Agreement • August 28th, 2013
THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, THE MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION
DRAFT PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONGDraft Programmatic Agreement • July 3rd, 2012
In Dakota, Olmsted, Goodhue, and Wabasha Counties in Minnesota and Buffalo, Trempealeau and La Crosse Counties in Wisconsin
DRAFT PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT BY AND AMONG THE CITY OF BOULDERDraft Programmatic Agreement • October 10th, 2023
day of August 2023, by and among the City of Boulder (hereinafter referred to as “the City”) and the Colorado State Historic Preservation Officer (hereinafter referred to as “SHPO”.
DRAFT PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICEDraft Programmatic Agreement • March 28th, 2019
WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) plans to approve The Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration (MDOT SHA) and TBC - The Boring Companies (TBC) Project pursuant to the requirements for FHWA approval of rights-of-way use agreements in 23 U.S.C. § 111 and 23 CFR § 1.23(c); and
DRAFT PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONGDraft Programmatic Agreement • June 23rd, 2017
WHEREAS, the Arecibo Observatory is a federal facility owned and funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), a federal agency. SRI International with Universities Space Research Association (USRA) and Universidad Metropolitana (UMET) receives funding from NSF via a Cooperative Agreement to operate and maintain the Arecibo Observatory for the benefit of research communities;
DRAFT PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONGDraft Programmatic Agreement • September 17th, 2020
WHEREAS, the Arecibo Observatory is a federal facility owned and funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), a federal agency. As of the date of this agreement, SRI International with Universities Space Research Association (USRA) and Universidad Metropolitana (UMET) receives funding from NSF via a Cooperative Agreement to operate and maintain the Arecibo Observatory for the benefit of research communities;
ContractDraft Programmatic Agreement • December 13th, 2022
Draft Programmatic AgreementDraft Programmatic Agreement • September 6th, 2017
WHEREAS, the Passaic River Basin Project was authorized by Section 101(a)(18) of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1990, as amended by Section 101(a)(18)(ii) WRDA 1990 and Section 327(i) WRDA 2000. The current reevaluation study was authorized, following Hurricane Sandy by the Disaster Relief Appropriation Act of 2013 (P.L. 113‐2), Second Interim Report to Congress, which listed the Passaic Tidal Protection Area Coastal Storm Risk Management Project (the Undertaking) as eligible to be managed as a separate project; and
PUBLIC NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION between the STATE OF Nevada and HUDDraft Programmatic Agreement • February 15th, 2017
This enclosed draft agreement between Region IX HUD and the Nevada State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) is designed to differentiate undertakings whose effects on historic properties may be negligible (and would be subject to a limited HUD review – such as refinancing, maintenance and some rehabilitation activities) from those which have greater potential to affect historic properties (and which would be submitted for comment to SHPO, Native American Indian Tribes and interested parties under the full force of the regulation at 36 CFR 800 - such as substantial rehabilitation, demolition and new construction activities). By differentiating between these types of activities, HUD and SHPO will be able to focus more attention and preservation efforts on the projects which have the potential to affect historic properties and to expedite more efficiently those undertakings with negligible impacts.
ContractDraft Programmatic Agreement • September 10th, 2015
DRAFT PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONGDraft Programmatic Agreement • December 1st, 2022
Resource ID Intersects APE-ADI Only within APE-AII Individual NRHPStatus Individual NRHPCriteria Contributing NRHP Status Contributing NRHPCriteria Archeological District (AD) Resource Type State Cronese Lake Yes No Eligible A, D N/A N/A CLAD Prehistoric District CA Halloran Springs NO Yes Eligible A, C, D N/A N/A HSAD Prehistoric District CA Mojave River Lithic Landscape Yes No Eligible A, D N/A N/A MRLL Prehistoric District CA Sidewinder Quarry(P-36-020375) Yes No Eligible A, D N/A N/A SQAD Prehistoric District CA Soapmine Road Yes No Eligible A, D N/A N/A SRAD Prehistoric District CA 26CK10964 No Yes Assumed Eligible D N/A N/A N/A Historic Component NV 26CK10965 No Yes Assumed Eligible D N/A N/A N/A Historic Component NV 26CK10966 No Yes Assumed Eligible D N/A N/A N/A Historic Component NV 26CK10967 No Yes Assumed Eligible D N/A N/A N/A Historic Component NV 26CK10968 No Yes Assumed Eligible D N/A N/A N/A Historic Component NV 26CK10969 No Yes Assumed Eligible D N/
