Allegheny County Health Department Air Quality and June 27, 2019 United States Steel Settlement Agreement – Comment and Response DocumentAllegheny County Health • February 4th, 2020
COMMENT COMMENTER(S) Parts I-II 1. I recommend that U.S. Steel berequired to fully comply with the Clean Air Act. Group of 37 contributors (commenterreference no. 7); Eva Resnick-Day RESPONSE: U.S. Steel is required to comply with the Clean Air Act. Part III 2. I do not support the “agreed uponprocess for evaluating and revising ArticleXXI” as it usurps ACHD’s authority over itsown regulations. Marcellus Protest RESPONSE: ACHD would not promulgate any regulations that are not beneficial or impossible for regulated entities to achieve. This agreement provides a framework to create rules that bothimprove air quality and are achievable. 3. The restriction on the use of the findings in the Settlement Agreement by anyone other than the parties contribute to an unnecessary burden on future challenges toactions of U.S. Steel and ACHD. Marcellus Protest RESPONSE: This is the very nature of a settlement agreement rather than a judication. 4. I do not support ACHD’s scope of action being bound b
