Weakness Clause Samples
A "Weakness" clause defines the allocation of risk or responsibility in situations where a party's position, claim, or right is found to be legally or factually deficient. In practice, this clause may specify that if a party's argument or documentation is deemed insufficient or invalid, that party bears the consequences, such as loss of rights or obligations to remedy the deficiency. The core function of this clause is to clarify the outcome when a party's position is weak, thereby encouraging thoroughness and reducing disputes over unclear or unsupported claims.
Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.
Weakness. We show that the ▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇’▇ scheme is not secure against the unknown key sharing and the impersonation attacks as follows.
Weakness. The school has suffered from a high teacher-turnover rate during the 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 school years; additionally, the school lacked a building Principal for approximately half of the 2017-2018 school year; as a result, adult and student morale, attendance, and culture all waned significantly.
Weakness. ● For a successful launch, a company needs funding and working capital. ● High exposure to fraud: An electronic payment system needs a very robust technical support and protection system taking into account the danger of fraud. As a new company, the Company must establish its credibility. In these situations, numerous phishing and hoax attempts undermine consumers' faith in the system. ● The system is reliant on both Internet access and computer knowledge. ● Since cryptocurrencies are still in their infancy, growth in emerging and less developed nations is hampered.
Weakness. Despite the fact that objectives of Mali CS-VIII were conceived to reflect the contextual needs of the Kolondieba populations, the evaluation team faced serious difficulties when measuring its final impact. A close analysis of some objectives found important flaws in fheir formulation and the absence of appropriate indicators. Objectives were formulated in such a way that the KPC survey could not measure more than six out of twenty-five Despite an extensively organized HIS developed by SC/US in Kolondieba, a tracking system and process used to monitor each project objective was not clearly established. Despite an impressive list of data collected on a regular basis, measurements of project accomplishment over time could only be obtained after a lengthy process of manual data extraction, and in many cases, interviews of supervisors. Many of the project’s objectives and indicators were more process than outcome or impact oriented. Therefore, conclusions about knowledge leading to behavior change with impact on disease reduction were at the discretion of the evaluators. The project did not develop a cost-recovery mechanism that could contribute to sustaining activities of village volunteers.
Weakness. Aspect of or omission from an Offeror’s proposal that includes ambiguities and conflicts within the Proposal, lack of complete descriptions, errors in interpretation, omissions of essential information, inadequate information that prevent the evaluators from knowing the intent of the Proposal.
Weakness. The Academy has a large population of students each year who do not return to the school - approximately 30% yearly. This requires ongoing time and investment resources being spent on new students and families to teach, model, and mold them around the schools’ expectations, learning processes, systems, and relationship building with adults in the school.
Weakness. Currently working on Efficacy and fidelity in implementing Curriculum Crafter to enhance classroom instruction.
Weakness. A major weakness is that dairy goat farming is currently a niche industry that is less known or we can say less ventured into commercially in Lesotho, but again it does not mean it is necessarily less effective or completely unknown.
Weakness. Time and other resources are scarce to allow proper training and feedback in communication. Students in need of training in written communication tend to ignore the learning opportunities. Both students and supervisors tend to spend too much time and effort in the projects.