Weak Sample Clauses

A "Weak" clause typically refers to a contractual provision that offers limited protection or imposes minimal obligations on the parties involved. In practice, such a clause may use vague language, lack enforceable requirements, or fail to specify clear consequences for non-compliance, making it less effective in addressing potential disputes. The core function of a weak clause is often to acknowledge an issue without creating strong legal commitments, which can result in ambiguity and reduced enforceability, potentially leaving parties exposed to unresolved risks.
Weak. In my Chinese cooking class, I made one. Clear: In my Chinese cooking class, I made an egg roll.
View Source
Weak. The data collection tools have not been shown to be valid (Q4 is 2) or both reliability and validity are not described (Q4 is 1 and Q5 is 1).
View Source
Weak. The selected individuals are not likely to be representative of the target population (Q1 is 2); or there is less than 60% participation (Q2 is 2) or selection is not described (Q1 is 1); and the level of participation is not described (Q2 is 1).
View Source
Weak. The annual agreement for each school counselor lacks a reflection of each school counselor’s scope of work. • The percentage of time may align with the recommended percentage of time for direct/indirect student services and program planning/school support. • Each agreement does not clearly reflect the school counseling program’s vision statement, mission statement and goals. • The narrative lacks a clear rationale of the school counselor’s use of time in support of the program goals. • The narrative does not clearly reflect the formal discussion between the school counselor and principal and how the decision to distribute duties among the school counseling staff was made.
View Source
Weak. While these papers take a position on the issue defined in the prompt, support of that position is insufficient and/or superficial. General explanation of connections between experience and the concept of teaching and learning contains irrelevant specifics along with few or no details. These papers display serious disorganization or underdevelopment Unsatisfactory facility in the use of language is evident as well as serious and frequent errors in sentence structure and usage.
View Source
Weak. The 20 variables that were found to have a significant association with the decision of the participants to pursue a STEM career or not, and their corresponding survey questions are shown in the next section. The question number is shown in parentheses. The survey questions were categorized into five groups. There were different numbers of survey questions in each group.
View Source

Related to Weak

  • Geometric visibility The visibility of the illuminating surface, including its visibility in areas which do not appear to be illuminated in the direction of observation considered, shall be ensured within a divergent space defined by generating lines based on the perimeter of the illuminating surface and forming an angle of not less than 5° with the axis of reference of the headlamp.

  • Weaknesses By far the biggest weakness in Dundee is the high concentration of deprivation. Of the 179 datazones in the city 53(30%) including 28.9% of the population are in the 15% most deprived according to the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation. The effect of this level of inequality is that Dundee has outcomes in relation to learning, health and employability which are significantly lower than the Scottish average.

  • Visibility 1. Unless the Council of Europe requests or agrees otherwise, the Grantee shall take all necessary measures to publicise the fact that the Action has been funded within the framework of a Joint Project between the European Union and the Council of Europe. Information given to the press and to the beneficiaries of the Action, all related publicity material, official notices, reports and publications, shall acknowledge that the Action was carried out with a grant from a Joint Project between the European Union and the Council of Europe and shall display in an appropriate way the Joint Projects’ visual identity (for instructions on use of the Joint Projects’ visual identity, see Appendix IV). 2. In cases where equipment or major items have been purchased using funds provided by the European Union or the Council of Europe, the Grantee shall indicate this clearly on that equipment and those major items (including display of the European Union and Council of Europe’s logos), provided that such actions do not jeopardise the safety and security of the Grantee’s staff. 3. The acknowledgement and Joint Projects’ visual identity shall be clearly visible in a manner that will not create any confusion regarding the identification of the Acton as a project of the Grantee and the ownership of the equipment and items by the Grantee. 4. All publications by the Grantee pertaining to the Action that have received funding from a Joint Project between the European Union and the Council of Europe, in whatever form and whatever medium, including the Internet, shall carry the following or a similar disclaimer: “This document has been produced using funds of a Joint Project between the European Union and the Council of Europe. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union or the Council of Europe”. 5. If the equipment purchased with a grant from a Joint Project is not transferred to the local partners of the Grantee or to the final recipient of the Action at the end of the implementation period of this Agreement, the visibility requirements as regards this equipment shall continue to apply between the end of the implementation period of this Agreement and the end of the Joint Project, if the latter lasts longer. 6. All layouts of any communication items prepared by the Grantee are subject to approval with the Contact point within the Council of Europe. 7. The Grantee accepts that the European Union and the Council of Europe may publish in any form and medium, including on their websites, the name and address of the Grantee, the purpose and amount of the grant and, if relevant, the percentage of co-financing.

  • Statistical Sampling Documentation a. A copy of the printout of the random numbers generated by the “Random Numbers” function of the statistical sampling software used by the IRO.‌ b. A description or identification of the statistical sampling software package used by the IRO.‌

  • Loop Testing/Trouble Reporting 2.1.6.1 Telepak Networks will be responsible for testing and isolating troubles on the Loops. Telepak Networks must test and isolate trouble to the BellSouth portion of a designed/non-designed unbundled Loop (e.g., UVL-SL2, UCL-D, UVL-SL1, UCL-ND, etc.) before reporting repair to the UNE Customer Wholesale Interconnection Network Services (CWINS) Center. Upon request from BellSouth at the time of the trouble report, Telepak Networks will be required to provide the results of the Telepak Networks test which indicate a problem on the BellSouth provided Loop. 2.1.6.2 Once Telepak Networks has isolated a trouble to the BellSouth provided Loop, and had issued a trouble report to BellSouth on the Loop, BellSouth will take the actions necessary to repair the Loop if a trouble actually exists. BellSouth will repair these Loops in the same time frames that BellSouth repairs similarly situated Loops to its End Users. 2.1.6.3 If Telepak Networks reports a trouble on a non-designed or designed Loop and no trouble actually exists, BellSouth will charge Telepak Networks for any dispatching and testing (both inside and outside the CO) required by BellSouth in order to confirm the Loop’s working status. 2.1.6.4 In the event BellSouth must dispatch to the end-user’s location more than once due to incorrect or incomplete information provided by Telepak Networks (e.g., incomplete address, incorrect contact name/number, etc.), BellSouth will ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Networks for each additional dispatch required to repair the circuit due to the incorrect/incomplete information provided. BellSouth will assess the applicable Trouble Determination rates from BellSouth’s FCC or state tariffs.