Common use of Underwriting Methodology Clause in Contracts

Underwriting Methodology. The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Mortgage Loan does not rely solely on the extent of the Mortgagor’s equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such extension of credit. The methodology employed objective criteria such as the Mortgagor’s income, assets and liabilities, to the proposed mortgage payment and, based on such methodology, the Mortgage Loan’s originator made a reasonable determination that at the time of origination the Mortgagor had the ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. This representation and warranty is a Deemed Material and Adverse Representation;

Underwriting Methodology. The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Mortgage Loan does not rely solely on the extent of the related Mortgagor’s 's equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such extension of credit. The methodology employed objective criteria such as the Mortgagor’s 's income, assets and liabilities, to the proposed mortgage payment and, based on such methodology, the Mortgage Loan’s 's originator made a reasonable determination that at the time of origination the Mortgagor had the ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the related Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. This representation and warranty is a Deemed Material and Adverse Representation;

Underwriting Methodology. The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Mortgage Loan does not rely solely on the extent of the Mortgagor’s 's equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such extension of credit. The methodology employed objective criteria such as the Mortgagor’s 's income, assets and liabilities, to the proposed mortgage payment and, based on such methodology, the Mortgage Loan’s 's originator made a reasonable determination that at the time of origination the Mortgagor had the ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. This representation and warranty is a Deemed Material and Adverse Representation;

Underwriting Methodology. The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Mortgage Loan does not rely solely on the extent of the Mortgagor’s equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such extension of credit. The methodology employed objective criteria such as the Mortgagor’s income, assets and liabilities, to the proposed mortgage payment and, based on such methodology, the Mortgage Loan’s originator made a reasonable determination that at the time of origination the Mortgagor had the ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. This representation and warranty is a Deemed Material and Adverse Representation;

Underwriting Methodology. The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Mortgage Loan does not rely solely on the extent of the related Mortgagor’s equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such extension of credit. The methodology employed objective criteria such as the Mortgagor’s income, assets and liabilities, to the proposed mortgage payment and, based on such methodology, the Mortgage Loan’s originator made a reasonable determination that at the time of origination the Mortgagor had the ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the related Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. This representation and warranty is a Deemed Material and Adverse Representation;

Underwriting Methodology. The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Mortgage Loan does not rely solely on the extent of the Mortgagor’s 's equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such extension of credit. The methodology employed objective criteria such as the Mortgagor’s 's income, assets and liabilities, to the proposed mortgage payment and, based on such methodology, the Mortgage Loan’s 's originator made a reasonable determination that at the time of origination the Mortgagor had the ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. This representation and warranty is a Deemed Material and Adverse Breach Representation;

Underwriting Methodology. The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Mortgage Loan does not rely solely on the extent of the Mortgagor’s equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such extension of credit. The methodology employed objective criteria such as the Mortgagor’s income, assets and liabilities, to the proposed mortgage payment and, based on such methodology, the Mortgage Loan’s originator made a reasonable determination that at the time of origination the Mortgagor had the ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. This representation and warranty is a Deemed Material and Adverse Breach Representation;”

Underwriting Methodology. The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Mortgage Loan does did not rely solely on the extent of the Mortgagor’s equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such extension of credit. The methodology employed objective criteria that related such as facts as, without limitation, the Mortgagor’s credit history; and the Mortgagor’s income, assets and liabilities, liabilities to the proposed mortgage payment and, based on such underwriting methodology, the Mortgage Loan’s originator made a reasonable determination that at the time of origination the Mortgagor had the ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. This representation and warranty is a Deemed Material and Adverse Representation;”

Underwriting Methodology. The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Mortgage Loan does not rely solely on the extent of the Mortgagor’s 's equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such extension of credit. The methodology employed objective criteria such as the Mortgagor’s 's income, assets and liabilities, to the proposed mortgage payment and, based on such methodology, the Mortgage Loan’s 's originator made a reasonable determination that at the time of origination the Mortgagor had the ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. This representation and warranty is a Deemed Material and Adverse Representation;

Underwriting Methodology. The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Mortgage Loan does not rely solely on the extent of the Mortgagor’s 's equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such extension of credit. The methodology employed objective criteria criteria, such as the Mortgagor’s 's income, assets and liabilities, to the proposed mortgage payment and, based on such methodology, the Mortgage Loan’s 's originator made a reasonable determination that at the time of origination the Mortgagor had the ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. This representation and warranty is a Deemed Material and Adverse Breach Representation;

Underwriting Methodology. The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Decision One Mortgage Loan does not rely solely on the extent of the Mortgagor’s 's equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such extension of credit. The methodology employed objective criteria such as the Mortgagor’s 's income, assets and liabilities, to the proposed mortgage payment and, based on such methodology, the Decision One Mortgage Loan’s 's originator made a reasonable determination that at the time of origination the Mortgagor had the ability to make timely payments on the Decision One Mortgage Loan. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Decision One Mortgage Loan. This representation and warranty is a Deemed Material and Adverse Representation;

Underwriting Methodology. The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Mortgage Loan does not rely solely on the extent of the Mortgagor’s 's equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such extension of credit. The methodology employed objective criteria such as the Mortgagor’s 's income, assets and liabilities, to the proposed mortgage payment and, based on such methodology, the Mortgage Loan’s 's originator made a reasonable determination that at the time of origination the Mortgagor had the ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. This representation and warranty is a Deemed Material and Adverse Breach Representation;

Underwriting Methodology. The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each MLN Mortgage Loan does not rely solely on the extent of the Mortgagor’s 's equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such extension of credit. The methodology employed objective criteria criteria, such as the Mortgagor’s 's income, assets and liabilities, to the proposed mortgage payment and, based on such methodology, the MLN Mortgage Loan’s 's originator made a reasonable determination that at the time of origination the Mortgagor had the ability to make timely payments on the MLN Mortgage Loan. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the MLN Mortgage Loan. This representation and warranty is a Deemed Material and Adverse Representation[Reserved];

Underwriting Methodology. The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Mortgage Loan does not rely solely on the extent of the Mortgagor’s 's equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such extension of credit. The methodology employed objective criteria criteria, such as the Mortgagor’s 's income, assets and liabilities, to the proposed mortgage payment and, based on such methodology, the Mortgage Loan’s 's originator made a reasonable determination that at the time of origination the Mortgagor had the ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. This representation and warranty is a Deemed Material and Adverse Representation;

Underwriting Methodology. The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Mortgage Loan does did not rely solely on the extent of the Mortgagor’s equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such extension of credit. The methodology employed objective criteria that related such as facts as, without limitation, the Mortgagor’s credit history; and the Mortgagor’s income, assets and liabilities, liabilities to the proposed mortgage payment and, based on such underwriting methodology, the Mortgage Loan’s originator made a reasonable determination that at the time of origination the Mortgagor had the ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. This representation and warranty is a Deemed Material and Adverse Representation;

Underwriting Methodology. The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Mortgage Loan does not rely solely on the extent of the Mortgagor’s equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such extension of credit. The methodology employed objective criteria such as the Mortgagor’s income, assets and liabilities, to the proposed mortgage payment and, based on such methodology, the Mortgage Loan’s originator made a reasonable determination that at the time of origination the Mortgagor had the ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. This representation and warranty is a Deemed Material and Adverse Breach Representation;

Underwriting Methodology. The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Mortgage Loan does not rely solely on the extent of the related Mortgagor’s 's equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such extension of credit. The methodology employed objective criteria such as the Mortgagor’s 's income, assets and liabilities, to the proposed mortgage payment and, based on such methodology, the Mortgage Loan’s 's originator made a reasonable determination that at the time of origination the Mortgagor had the ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the related Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. This representation and warranty is a Deemed Material and Adverse Representation;

Underwriting Methodology. The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Mortgage Loan does not rely solely on the extent of the Mortgagor’s 's equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such extension of credit. The methodology employed objective criteria such as the Mortgagor’s 's income, assets and liabilities, to the proposed mortgage payment and, based on such methodology, the Mortgage Loan’s 's originator made a reasonable determination that at the time of origination the Mortgagor had the ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. This representation and warranty is a Deemed Material and Adverse Breach Representation;

Underwriting Methodology. The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Mortgage Loan does not rely solely on the extent of the Mortgagor’s equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such extension of credit. The methodology employed objective criteria criteria, such as the Mortgagor’s income, assets and liabilities, to the proposed mortgage payment and, based on such methodology, the Mortgage Loan’s originator made a reasonable determination that at the time of origination the Mortgagor had the ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan. This representation and warranty is a Deemed Material and Adverse Breach Representation;