Third Party Review Sample Clauses

Third Party Review. 4.3.1 Where Adopter elects to submit its Implementation to Third Party Review (defined below) pursuant to Section 4.1, Adopter shall submit to a Third Party Robustness Authority (defined in Procedural Appendix Section 4) information sufficient to enable such facility to determine that the Robustness Verification List accurately describes the compliance of the Implementation with the Robustness Rules (such review, a “Third Party Review”). In the event the Third Party Robustness Authority makes a determination that the Robustness Verification List does not accurately describe compliance of the Implementation with the Robustness Rules, Adopter’s Implementation shall not be deemed to have passed the Third Party Review. DTLA will provide instructions to Third Party Robustness Authorities requiring that such a determination shall be provided in the form of a report issued to Adopter, which report shall be retained by Adopter and the applicable Third Party Robustness Authority and shall be made available to DTLA or Third Party Beneficiaries in the event of an allegation that one or more of Adopter’s purported Licensed Products are not compliant with the Robustness Rules. Once an Implementation has passed Third Party Review, other products of Adopter may use the same Implementation without requiring re-submission to Third Party Review. If such Implementation is Partially Renewable, the Third Party Review may, at Adopter’s election, be limited to the portions of the Implementation that are not Renewable. For clarification, Adopter may choose to obtain Third Party Review for a Renewable Implementation. 4.3.2 DTLA shall make available to Adopters a list of approved third party facilities.

Third Party Review. A. The neutral third party shall be selected pursuant to the arbitration provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement. B. The parties may submit all evidence deemed relevant to the issue to the neutral third party. At the request of either party, a hearing shall be held to receive such evidence. Any such hearing shall be held within thirty

Third Party Review a. If, after the reconsideration process has taken place, the LPDC and the educator are still unable to come to agreement, the educator must provide a written request to the LPDC for a third party review panel. The educator must provide written notice of the request for a third party review to the LPDC chairperson at least one week prior to the LPDC meeting. This notice shall be sent to the LPDC chairperson. b. The panel members will be identified at the next LPDC meeting and the panel will review the LPDC decision within 30 days. The panel will consist of: i. One licensed educator selected by the LPDC; ii. One licensed educator selected by the educator; iii. One licensed educator agreed upon by the above two. These three individuals then function as a panel to review the LPDC decision and either uphold it or overturn it. c. The educator will be notified in writing of the third party review panel decision within five working days. This decision is agreed to be final. At such time as licensure replaces certification, references to certification in this Agreement. will include license when appropriate.

Third Party Review. A. The neutral third party shall be selected pursuant to the arbitration provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement. B. The parties may submit all evidence deemed relevant to the issue to the neutral third party. At the request of either party, a hearing shall be held to receive such evidence. Any such hearing shall be held within thirty (30) days after the matter is referred to the neutral third party. While it is not intended that the third party undertake a full and complete job evaluation study, he or she shall review other comparable or relevant job classifications and their wage schedules for comparison purposes, and may make an on site inspection of the workplace and conduct a reasonable number of interviews of incumbents. C. In determining an appropriate wage schedule, the neutral third party will endeavor to assure that the wage schedule permits the Company to be competitive in both its operations and in seeking applicants in the relevant marketplace, and that the new job classification is compensated equitably. D. A written decision as to the appropriate wage schedule will be rendered by the neutral third party within forty-five (45) days of the date after which all evidence has been submitted or, where a hearing has been requested, the hearing is concluded. In the event that the neutral third party determines that a different wage schedule than the one established by the Company is appropriate, the new schedule shall be placed in effect retroactive to the date the change or new job was implemented, except that in no event shall the retroactive effect exceed 180 days. E. The costs of the third party neutral, and any associated administrative costs imposed by a third-party administrator to which the parties have mutually agreed, will be borne by the Company.

Third Party Review. In the event that the educator and the LPDC cannot reach a mutually-acceptable resolution, the LPDC will provide for a third-party review and decision. The LPDC will convene a panel of licensed educators for a majority decision: One educator selected by the LPDC; One educator selected by the educator making the appeal; One educator approved by both the LPDC and the educator, The Association President, and The Superintendent In the event that the educator and the panel cannot reach a mutually-acceptable resolution, the educator may request review of the matter by the Ohio Department of Education. All costs for such reviews shall be borne by the educator making the appeal.

Third Party Review a. If lack of approval still exists, the applicant may request in writing the formation of a three-person appeal panel. The panel will consist of one (1) licensed educator selected by the SLPDC; one (1) licensed educator selected by the educator; and one (1) licensed educator agreed upon by the above two (2). These three (3) individuals serve as a review panel to review the SLPDC decision and either uphold or overturn the IPDP within the time frame on the appeals form. b. This appeal panel is the final step in local resolution of the appeal.

Third Party Review. 1. The neutral third party shall be selected by mutual agreement from among those who possess acknowledged expertise in the area of employee compensation. 2. The parties may submit all evidence deemed relevant to the issue to the neutral third party. At the request of either party, a hearing shall be held to receive such evidence. Any such hearing shall be held within thirty (30) days after the matter is referred to the neutral third party. While it is not intended that the third party undertake a full and complete job evaluation study, the neutral third party shall review other comparable or relevant job classifications and their compensation packages for comparison purposes and may make an on-site inspection of the workplace and conduct a reasonable number of interviews of incumbents. 3. In determining an appropriate compensation package, the neutral third party must assure that the compensation package permits the Company to be competitive in both its operations and in seeking applicants in the relevant marketplace, and that compensation package will equitably compensate employees who populate the new job classification. 4. A written decision as to the appropriate compensation package, setting forth the rationale for the compensation awarded, will be rendered by the neutral third party within forty-five (45) days of the date that the neutral third party was selected. In the event that the neutral third party determines that a different compensation package than the one established by the Company is appropriate, the new schedule shall be placed in effect retroactive to the date the change or new job was implemented, except that in no event shall the retroactive effect exceed 180 days. 5. The costs of the third party neutral, and any associated administrative costs imposed by a third-party administrator, will be shared equally by the Company and the Union.

Third Party Review. Seller’s compliance with Sections 5 and 6 of this Agreement is subject to Third Party review (“Third Party Review”), and the terms and conditions of such Third Party Review are set forth on Exhibit G attached hereto.

Third Party Review. If the LPDC and the educator are still unable to come to an agreement after the reconsideration process, a panel shall be formed. This panel will consist of: one (1) District educator selected by the educator requesting the third party review, one (1) District educator selected by the LPDC, and one (1) District educator agreed upon by both the LPDC and the educator requesting the third party review. The panel's decision shall be final.