The IoT6 Interoperability Test Process Clause Samples

The IoT6 Interoperability Test Process. ‌ As mentioned earlier, interoperability is one of the absolute key factors for the success of the Internet of Things. On one hand, IoT is an initial step for sensing technologies where interoperability enables the different devices, based on various communication standards to exchange information, so interoperability in this domain is the driving force and the basis to form higher purpose applications based on the data-interchange of these sensor values. On the other hand, interoperability, which is so crucial for the success of the IoT is really difficult to tackle in such a highly heterogeneous environment. This important issue cannot be stressed enough by all different entities taking part in research activities concerning the IoT. Without the necessary research work on conformance- and interoperability testing, the future success of the IoT cannot be assured. The problem to achieve interoperability in the IoT is really complex as the IoT may usually be seen as multi-dimensional due to the coexistence of many systems that need to communicate and exchange information. Furthermore, it is highly heterogeneous due to the amount of different devices to be integrated and therefore it is difficult to reach a global agreement and widely accepted specification. The IoT also has to be seen as dynamic and non-linear as new things may steadily enter and leave the environment and support new, yet unconsidered formats and protocols. Finally, the Internet of Things is clearly hard to model in the light of the existence of many different data encoding formats described in different languages that do not necessarily need to share the same modelling principles. The following section describes a process to test the interoperability for the IoT6 architecture and the involved components. It is following a generic approach that is shortly explained at the beginning. To keep the document manageable, only a brief introduction is given. For a more thorough discussion of the topic of interoperability testing the reader is referred to [14]. Following the explanation of the test approach, different test documents are defined that will be used in the course of of this WP to validate the IoT6 architecture. 3.2.1 ETSI – EG 202 237: Methods for Testing and Specification‌ ETSI EG 202 237 has been selected for the test process of the IoT6 architecture. This testing methodology, which is also used to some extent by the PROBE-IT project, defines a generic process for interoperability test...
View Source

Related to The IoT6 Interoperability Test Process

  • Interoperability To the extent required by applicable law, Cisco shall provide You with the interface information needed to achieve interoperability between the Software and another independently created program. Cisco will provide this interface information at Your written request after you pay Cisco’s licensing fees (if any). You will keep this information in strict confidence and strictly follow any applicable terms and conditions upon which Cisco makes such information available.

  • Stability Testing Patheon will conduct stability testing on the Products in accordance with the protocols set out in the Specifications for the separate fees and during the time periods set out in Schedule C. Patheon will not make any changes to these testing protocols without prior written approval from Client. If a confirmed stability test failure occurs, Patheon will notify Client within [***], after which Patheon and Client will jointly determine the proceedings and methods to be undertaken to investigate the cause of the failure, including which party will bear the cost of the investigation. Patheon will not be liable for these costs unless it has failed to perform the Manufacturing Services in accordance with the Specifications and cGMPs. Patheon will give Client all stability test data and results at Client’s request.

  • Performance Testing (a) All performance tests of the Project, including any Initial Performance Test required in Section 2 of Appendix VIII, will be performed in accordance with the test procedures set forth in Appendix VIII (“Performance Test”), including additional procedures and protocols related to Performance Testing as mutually agreed between Buyer and Seller (“Test Procedures”). Seller shall bear all costs and receive all revenues, if applicable, associated with all Performance Tests. (b) After the Initial Delivery Date and during the Delivery Term, Buyer will have the right to conduct a Performance Test (“Buyer Performance Test”) no more than once a calendar year to demonstrate whether the Project is capable of delivering the Distribution Services at the Contract Capacity. Within 30 calendar days following a Buyer Performance Test, Seller will have the right to retest the Project with a Performance Test (“Seller Retest”). For the avoidance of doubt, the results of any Seller Retest will supersede the results of the preceding Buyer Performance Test. (i) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is capable of delivering Distribution Services at or above ninety-nine percent (99%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, the Contract Capacity will remain the Initial Contract Capacity; (ii) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is capable of delivering Distribution Services at more than or equal to eighty-five (85%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, but less than ninety-nine percent (99%) of the Initial Contract Capacity (“Testing Band”), the Contract Capacity will be automatically adjusted (upwards or downwards) to the capacity commensurate with the amount of Distribution Services the Project delivered during the Performance Test within the Testing Band. (iii) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is not capable of delivering Distribution Services of at least eighty-five percent (85%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, an Event of Default shall occur in accordance with Section 7.1(a)(viii).

  • Registry Interoperability and Continuity Registry Operator shall comply with the Registry Interoperability and Continuity Specifications as set forth in Specification 6 attached hereto (“Specification 6”).

  • Drug Testing (A) The state and the PBA agree to drug testing of employees in accordance with section 112.0455, F.S., the Drug-Free Workplace Act. (B) All classes covered by this Agreement are designated special risk classes for drug testing purposes. Special risk means employees who are required as a condition of employment to be certified under Chapter 633 or Chapter 943, F.S. (C) An employee shall have the right to grieve any disciplinary action taken under section 112.0455, the Drug-Free Workplace Act, subject to the limitations on the grievability of disciplinary actions in Article 10. If an employee is not disciplined but is denied a demotion, reassignment, or promotion as a result of a positive confirmed drug test, the employee shall have the right to grieve such action in accordance with Article 6.