Technical Risks. 9.3.1. The Client accepts risks of financial losses due to a failure of information, communication, electrical and other systems from the Client side.
Technical Risks. It is uncertain whether a ChiNext company is able to convert its technical innovations into physical products or services. When the industry is experiencing rapid technological development and replacement, its product may be obsolete and may not survive in the market. (In case of any discrepancy between the English and the Chinese versions, the English version shall prevail.)
Technical Risks. 2.2.5.1 It is uncertain whether a ChiNext company is able to convert its technical innovations into physical products or services. When the industry is experiencing rapid technological development and replacement, its product may be obsolete and may not survive in the market. The above summary only covers part of the risks related to Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect and Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect and any above mentioned laws, rules and regulations are subject to change from time to time. The Client should visit the website of HKEx for updates and details for Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect and Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect. If the aforesaid provisions are inconsistent with the rules and regulations of HKEx, SZSE and SSE, the rules and regulation of HKEx, SZSE and SSE shall prevail.
Technical Risks. There is higher degree of uncertainty whether a STAR company is able to convert its technical innovations into physical products or services. When the industry is experiencing rapid technological development and replacement, its product may be obsolete and may not survive in the market. You should seek independent professional advice if you are uncertain of or have not understood any aspect of this Annex, the nature and risks involved in trading of ChiNext Shares and/or STAR Shares.
Technical Risks. The creation of a large integrated computing infrastructure, with a common middleware, open and available to every eligible person, is very appealing idea, but its realisation may encounter many conflicting requirements and interests. As there are several strong Grid communities and several Grid projects, possible divergences of their efforts could create a serious problem for the concept of a unified Grid. To minimise this kind of the risk we plan to work hand-to-hand with the other Grid projects (DataGrid, EuroGrid, GriPhyN, PPDG, and others), and to actively participate in the Global Grid Forum and the DataGrid Industry & Research Forum. As Grid computing offers interesting opportunities for large number of commercial applications, it is very possible that industrial labs are already working on several ideas of our Project. We are sure such competition will bring the best end products to society. The CrossGrid Project depends on results of the DataGrid Project, so a very close collaboration between them is of key importance. In daily operations the CrossGrid Architecture Team will be in close contact with the DataGrid Project team to watch their progress, gain experience, and obtain any necessary public domain results at the earliest possible time. In the case of changes to the DataGrid schedule/deliverables, the management of the CrossGrid Project will analyse the situation and take the necessary steps to overcome difficulties.
Technical Risks. 5.1 Where the R & D Center identifies any technical risk which may lead to failure or partial failure of the R & D, the R & D Center shall, within ten days, notify Kiwa Shandong and take necessary actions to minimize the loss; CAU shall have the obligation to take necessary actions to remind the R & D Center to pay attention to the technical risks which may exist, and urge the R & D Center to notify Kiwa Shandong, so as to avoid unnecessary investment.
Technical Risks. The project will combine different types of activities: gathering and reviewing state of the art information and data, laboratory tests, theoretical and numerical modelling, analytical deskwork. The following risks have been considered: • Lack of information for the WP 2: data for development and validation of mechanical models are known to exist already from previous research projects. Information about current practice in recycling can be obtained from the different research institutes, professional associations and governmental agencies associated with the project and access to this information will be facilitated by the reference end-users group. • There is no technical risk to WP 12. However, the detailed guidelines to be developed under this WP will inevitably be a compromise that balances the conflicting economic, environmental and social requirements of a particular structure. This will almost certainly contain an element of subjective judgement. • Besides cathodic protection, the application of inhibitors is the most promising technique for the corrosion protection of concrete highway structures. The results of the proposed investigations might, however, indicate that these inhibitors do not effectively protect steel in concrete against corrosion in all circumstances. In that case some inappropriate procedures for anti-corrosion protection of steel in concrete can be eliminated and the basis for eventual further research of corrosion inhibitors for concrete will be formed. In the case of positive results, the application of corrosion inhibitors will surely be the most cost-beneficial technique for the rehabilitation of concrete structures with minimal traffic delay and diversion costs. • The main technical risk associated with HPFRCC is their long-term behaviour given the limited time scale of the proposed research and development. However, the numerical simulation tools should help capture the long-term behaviour of these materials and hybrid structures in a realistic way. • In the survey on highway infrastructures not all EEA and CE countries can be involved into the project. However, efforts will be made to ensure that the selected partners will provide relevant data for a comprehensive survey on highway structures in these countries. • Lack of expertise: the experts enlisted for the project are key researchers in Europe in their field. Most of them have taken part in the past in various European projects and are active in the field of standard...
Technical Risks. 6.1.1. The Platform has been launched on an experimental basis and it does not refer to the main services of the Company. The Platform is still being developed and may from time to time undergo enhancements which can result in technical instability and malfunction, thus providing an opportunity for the trading mechanism abuse.
Technical Risks. 4.1.1 Common technical risks for HVAC systems The following technical risks are common for the various HVAC system types reviewed and benefited from being modelled as an off-axis scenario in the DfP simulation. • Heat recovery VRF system. Zonal thermal diversity tends to favour heat recovery VRF systems. With smaller VRF buildings delivered as a shell-and- core base building design, stress test poor design by the tenant by removing the diversified internal zone loads. • Water-to-air heat pumps. Unless enforced via tenant leases or a CAT-A HVAC design, any condenser water valves for the compressor units are likely to be open for long durations, leading to the pumping system acting as a constant flow instead of variable flow system. This risk is mitigated if continuously modulating condenser water valves linked to compressor load is specified. • Air-to-air heat pumps. Where a single heat pump serves both interior and perimeter zones with terminal reheats, the high efficiencies of heat pumps in heating mode is not capitalised6 and reheat energy will be high. Where this result is not observed in the simulation results, revisit how the air transfer between HVAC thermal zones is modelled by the simulation software engine or consider adding internal partition walls to ensure this is modelled correctly by the software. From a mechanical design perspective, this system should be designed with separate perimeter and interior zone heat pumps. • Centralised cooling and heating plant. o Standard designs seem wedded to the use of plate heat exchangers at each tenancy for hydraulic separation. This practice is advantageous to enable tenant fit-outs without affecting the broader hydronic network and pseudomonas risk-management. However, this is at the expense of pressure losses7 across the heat exchanger and more notably, restricts execution of temperature resets8 that increases chiller and 6 This is because the heat pumps will always operate to satisfy the warmest zones, leaving any colder zones to be reheated using terminal reheats. 7 Typically between 10kPa to 40kPa per heat exchanger. 8 Relaxed temperatures (higher for chilled water, CHW; and lower for hot water, LTHW) decrease thermal efficiency of heat exchangers which could be specified to be anywhere between 80 and 95% efficient. heating plant efficiency during building partial loading. As a result, the system regresses to operating as a constant temperature system, which can perpetuate the ‘low deltaT9’ syndrome....
Technical Risks. The Client accepts the risks of financial losses incurred because of failures of information, communication, electronic and other systems. The Client accepts the risks of financial losses, which can happen because of the malfunction of hardware and software facilities and poor communication on the Client’s side. The Client bears responsibility for the financial losses incurred because of ignorance of the instructions presented in the Client’s Terminal Instruction Manual. Client bears sole responsibility for the safety of confidential information received from the Company and accepts the risks of financial losses incurred as the result of unauthorized access of the third parties to the trading account
