Task 7 Clause Samples
Task 7. Gather, Storeand Maintain DataPertinent to Administration of the CCDC ARL Outreach Program: The contractor shall create and maintain a database management system for CCDC-ARL Outreach program information. The contractor shall ensure there are personnel sufficiently trained in database management such that they can maintain the system and generate required reports and queries for information. The contractor shall maintain records of all applicants for four years from date of application to the program; records of selectees shall be maintained following end of students tenure or the records shall be transfer to the COR upon task order completion. The contractor shall maintain a database of all student recipients in the program, to include information regarding the fellow's institution, current address and home of record address, scientific discipline, academic record, thesis topic, publications, comments and any benefits derived from participation in the program, whether or not the fellow participated in summer employment at a DoD facility, current status of fellow, payments made to the fellow and to the fellow’s academic institution, and other data of potential interest for analysis. This database shall be capable of generating multiple queries in a timely manner with accurate and comprehensive information provided to DoD and Congressional personnel regarding the program's demographics, minority participation, attrition, follow-on research opportunities and program finances. The database must also be capable of transferring data to a successor contractor’s database system.
Task 7. Act as lead consultant to manage and co-ordinate the outputs of other consultants appointed by the Airports Commission.
Task 7. Outlet Gates 60% Design
Task 7. 3.1: Overview of the available tools in the participating MSs
3.1.1 Please describe your approach in identification of available PFP tools in your country (searching webpages, exploring in public institutions, …). MALTA (Ministry for Health): The chosen food category is Milk and milk products. Data was extracted from the webpage of the local food producer. For this pilot procurement, the food list was created following the available milk products. FINLAND (The Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare): We used the list of tools identified in the Table 1 (Annex 2), - Measures taken in Finland to promote the public procurement of health-promoting and sustainable catering services and food (chapter Attachments) as a starting point and updated the list using THL’s WP7 team’s expertise and contacts and the Internet. GREECE (The Institute of Child Health): Searching webpages. DENMARK (Municipality of Copenhagen’s Food Procurement Department): Primarily used knowledge sharing. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA - Republic of Srpska (Public Health Institute of the Republic of Srpska): We did not identify any tool. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA - Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Institute of Public Health of Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina): We did not identify any tool. AUSTRIA (Federal Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection (BMSGPK), Austrian National Public Health Institute (GÖG), The Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES)): / HUNGARY (National Institute of Pharmacy and Nutrition): As our institute does not specialise in food procurement, we had to ask the Public Procurement Authority of Hungary for help in identifying tools. The procurements of food or public catering services are implemented via the Hungarian Electronic Public Procurement System, but this system is used for all kinds of public procurement. A similar tool, like the Slovene food catalogue does not exist in Hungary currently. If regulations, recommendations etc. are meant by under the “tool” definition as well, we can say that in Hungary there are many legislations, guidelines and recommendations, food standards that have direct or indirect effects on public procurement of food, as well as on public catering in general. These were identified at the beginning of the project and have been followed up since then. POLAND (Medical University of Silesia): Desk research, consultations with experts and public procurement officers.
3.1.2 How many tools for PFP have you identifi...
Task 7