Table III Clause Samples

Table III. Probability Distribution of Available Time for Evacuation Based on Hydrological Forecasts and Decision Making(48) Time River Rhine River Meuse Low Tidal River Area Northern Coast South West Coast Western Coast Lake IIssel Area No time 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 1 day 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.15 0.4 0.45 0.4 2 days 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.4 3 days 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 4 days 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.05 0.0 0.05 0.0 happen unexpectedly. Also is taken into account that decisions for evacuation are not made more early than necessary. In the Netherlands the lead time for coastal areas is longer than for river areas but models shows less certain information. The possibility of preventive evacuation in- creases as the available time increases. Although, for some areas, it is still—far from—impossible to evac- uate completely out of the area before the dike is breached, as illustrated by the expected value for the success of preventive evacuation in the Netherlands (e.g., for the most critical dike ring, it is expected that approximately 15% of the inhabitants can leave the area preventively(48)).

Table III. Overview of the amphipod predators in the Southern Ocean (bibliographic data). "Groups" refers to the number of different predator families (fishes and birds) or orders (invertebrates and mammals), species to the predator species number, and citations to the total number of recorded pairs [amphipod-predator]. "groups" species citations Invertebrates 12 33 69 Fishes 19 101 798 Birds 11 48 529 Mammals 2 10 39 The exploitation of this dataset is, however, rather difficult. In the early Antarctic literature, most of the data about amphipods in predators' digestive tracts were in the presence/absence form. From the mid 20th century, some quantitative information became available, mainly as "frequency of occurrence". But it is only since the 1980's that were published valid data in the form of preyed amphipod mass and/or volume percentages in predator diets. Moreover, even in recent papers, most authors have not tried to determine amphipod species, making the information less useful. Notwithstanding, a tentative inventory of predators for which amphipods represent a significant share in the bulk of their diet was established; some of these are listed in Table IV. For most of the other recorded predators, amphipods constitute a smaller dietary fraction (in the order of few percents). As shown in Table IV, hyperiid species (mainly Themisto gaudichaudii) are largely consumed by predators feeding in the water column (myctophid fish, petrels, penguins and Annelida Polychaeta Harmothoe ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ B → 99 GAM Crustacea Amphipoda Bovallia gigantea B → 99 GAM Pisces Artetidraconidae Artetidraco orianae B → 80 GAM Pogonophryne permitini B → 73 GAM Channichthyidae Champsocephalus gunnari P → 86 HYP Harpagiferidae Harpagifer bispinis B → 98 GAM Myctophidae Electrona carlsbergi P → 27 HYP Nototheniidae Gobionotothen gibberifrons B → 38 GAM Lepidonotothen larseni B-P → 40 GAM-HYP Notothenia coriiceps B → 88 GAM Rajidae Bathyraja maccaini B → 58 GAM Aves Oceanitidae Oceanites oceanicus P → 45 HYP Procellariidae Pachyptila belcheri P → 70 HYP Pachyptila turtur P → 60 HYP Sphenicidae Eudyptes chrysolophus P → 37 HYP Pygoscelis adeliae P (B) → 58 HYP-GAM Mammalia Cetacea Balaenoptera borealis P → 45 HYP

Table III. Guaranteed Advertising YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 Expenditure --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- CIM City Sites [***] [***] [***] --------------------------------------------------------------- MP3R▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ (▇▇tional) [***] [***] [***] --------------------------------------------------------------- MP3R▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ (▇▇x ▇▇▇io [***] [***] [***] affiliate websites only) --------------------------------------------------------------- Auto▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ [***] [***] [***] --------------------------------------------------------------- ValP▇▇.▇▇▇ [***] [***] [***] --------------------------------------------------------------- [SUBTOTAL OF COX [[***]] [[***]] [[***]] INTERNET PROPERTIES] --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- Cox ▇▇▇io Stations [***] [***] [***] --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- Discretionary (i.e. any [***] [***] [***] Cox ▇▇▇perty listed in Section 12(a) above) --------------------------------------------------------------- Total [***] [***] [***] --------------------------------------------------------------- c) CIM may, at any time in its discretion, elect to decrease the annual minimum expenditures set forth in Table II or Table III above with respect to the Cox ▇▇▇ernet Properties. If CIM reduces the annual minimums, it may require Tick▇▇▇.▇▇▇ ▇▇ re-allocate up to half of the guaranteed minimum expenditures to other Cox ▇▇▇ernet Properties, provided that CIM will make good faith efforts to allocate Tick▇▇▇.▇▇▇'▇ ▇xpenditures to Cox Internet Properties that CIM believes will be useful and attractive means of promoting Tick▇▇▇.▇▇▇. d) With respect to advertising on the CIM City Sites, Tick▇▇▇.▇▇▇ shall make ad buys at a CPM of $[***]. With respect to ad buys in other Cox ▇▇▇ia properties, Tick▇▇▇.▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ll be entitled to the average rate paid by advertisers on such properties for ad buys of a similar dollar amount and in consideration of the prominence of the advertisements. The terms for such advertising (other than rates) will be the same terms found in the standard terms and conditions for such advertising. e) Wherever commercially reasonable and appropriate,Tick▇▇▇.▇▇▇ advertisements in Cox ▇▇▇ia properties will include a specific mention of the corresponding CIM City Site (by ap...