Table A2. Component code (if any) Component title at the receiving institution (as indicated in the course catalogue) tick as applicable Reason for change1 No of ECTS credits Deleted Added Total amount of ECTS credits after the changes: Exceptional changes to Table B (if applicable) (to be approved by e-mail or signature by the student, the responsible person in the Sending Institution and the responsible person in the Receiving Institution) Table B2 Module code Module title as indicated in the Leuphana course catalogue (mystudy) tick as applicable No of ECTS credits Deleted Added Total amount of ECTS credits after the changes: The student, the sending institution and the receiving institution approve the proposed amendments to the mobility programme by signature. Student’s signature Date: For the sending institution: (Xxxxxx Xxxxx, International Office) Date: For the receiving institution: Date: 1 Reasons for exceptional changes to the study programme abroad: Reasons for deleting a component Reasons for adding a component
Table A2. Monitoring information and data elements Monitoring information Previous National Partnership Agreement performance indicators 2013 Early Childhood Education and Care National Minimum Data Set data elements Enrolment and attendance All children Disadvantaged children Aboriginal and Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Islander children The proportion of children who are enrolled in (and attending, where possible to measure) a preschool program. The proportion of disadvantaged children enrolled in (and attending, where possible to measure) a preschool program. The proportion of Indigenous children (by geographic location as identified by the Australian Standard Geographic Classification (ASGC)), who are enrolled in (and attending, where possible to measure) a preschool program. • Preschool program enrolment indicator • Preschool program attendance indicator • Maximum preschool program hours available • Child—preschool program received from a qualified teacher indicator • Preschool program repeater indicator • SEIFA cluster • Indigenous status Teachers The number of teachers delivering preschool programs who are four year university trained and early childhood qualified. Field of highest qualification relevant to ECEC Level of highest qualification relevant to ECEC Delivery of preschool program indicator Hours worked in preschool program delivery Role Type of work activity Hours Hours per week of attendance (where possible to measure) at a preschool program. Preschool program attendance indicator Preschool program hours attended, including by bands of hours attended in the reference week (0-4 hours, 5-9 hours, 10-14 hours, 15+ hours). Cost Distribution of children who attend a preschool program by weekly cost per child (after subsidies) as defined by jurisdictions. Fees charged Reporting of subsidies provided to targeted groups Demographics and service characteristics Name Sex
Table A2. Summary Statistics for Data Used in Analysis of Institutional Gaps and Income Gaps Variable No. observations Mean Standard deviation Minimum Maximum Landlock 68 0.1323529 0.3413936 0 1 Openness (Xxxxx and Xxxxxx, 1995) 63 0.2252768 0.3423797 0 1 Log constructed trade share 68 2.721456 0.7672238 0.94 4.586000 (Xxxxxxx-Xxxxx)Latitude 68 6.318064 19.691030 –41.81407 61.06258 Ethnolinguistic fractionalization 61 46.377050 29.430240 1 90 Africa 68 0.3382353 0.4766266 0 1 South Asia 68 0.0588235 0.2370435 0 1 East Asia and the Pacific 68 0.0735294 0.2629441 0 1 Americas 68 0.3970588 0.4929263 0 1 Oil production dummy 68 0.2647059 0.4444566 0 1 Commodity dummy 68 0.6764706 0.4713010 0 1 Institutional index 68 –0.1134657 0.7704978 –1.978333 1.585833 Log mortality 68 4.588946 1.2550750 2.145931 7.986165 Log GDP per capita 68 7.794468 1.1091530 5.252923 10.031100 TABLE A3. Mexico: Summary Statistics of Variables and Data Used for TFP Convergence Analysis, by Industry Industry codea (Log) output Obs (Log) labor Obs (Log) capital Obs Labor share Obs 311 15.77 25 12.98 25 13.87 25 0.06 25 313 15.08 25 12.72 25 13.68 25 0.10 25 314 13.65 25 10.36 25 11.50 25 0.04 25 321 14.35 25 12.50 25 13.41 25 0.16 25 322 13.11 17 11.33 17 11.44 17 0.17 17 323 12.52 7 10.01 7 10.87 7 0.08 7 324 12.86 17 11.19 17 11.70 17 0.19 17 331 11.91 25 9.85 25 11.77 25 0.13 25 332 12.49 17 10.49 17 10.55 17 0.14 17 341 14.61 25 12.08 25 14.35 25 0.08 25 342 13.29 17 11.38 17 11.67 17 0.15 17 351 14.98 25 12.48 25 14.16 25 0.09 25 352 15.09 25 12.89 25 13.49 25 0.11 25 353 13.23 7 10.49 7 11.94 7 0.07 7 354 12.72 25 9.84 25 12.44 25 0.06 25 355 13.66 25 11.69 25 12.90 25 0.14 25 356 14.00 17 11.83 17 12.70 17 0.12 17 361 12.08 17 10.13 17 9.04 17 0.14 17 362 13.81 25 11.86 25 13.12 25 0.15 25 369 14.41 25 12.05 25 14.36 25 0.10 25 371 15.38 25 12.59 25 14.84 25 0.07 25 372 14.31 25 11.34 25 12.73 25 0.06 25 381 14.24 25 12.08 25 12.58 25 0.12 25 382 14.02 25 11.78 25 11.97 25 0.11 25 383 14.64 25 12.57 25 13.02 25 0.13 25 384 15.95 25 13.15 25 14.22 25 0.07 25 385 12.15 17 9.76 17 10.19 17 0.10 17 390 12.21 17 10.34 17 10.86 17 0.16 17 Source: United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO).
Table A2. Reference 0.25 0.36 0.48 0.39 0.30 0.25 0.39 0.53 0.41 0.30 0.20 0.33 0.45 0.33 0.20 Departure curve Departure in 8 hours 0.15 0.11 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.15 0.11 0.08 0.14 0.20 Average load of traffic 3 persons/car 1 person/car 0.25 0.00 0.16 0.04 0.08 0.08 0.04 0.14 0.00 0.20 0.25 0.00 0.18 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.18 0.00 0.25 Average travel speed 40 km/hour 0.25 0.16 0.08 0.04 0.00 0.35 0.23 0.10 0.05 0.00 2 km/hour 0.00 0.04 0.08 0.14 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.20 0.30 Capacity of outflow of an area Factor 0.3 (+ 50%) 0.35 0.23 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.25 0.18 0.10 0.05 0.00 Factor 0.1 (–50%) 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.18 0.25 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 Average road capacity Breakdown of a highway Breakdown of a 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.11 0.11 0.15 0.15 regional way 1330 Xxxxx et al. Citizens’ Response Response of Authorities Environment and Infrastructure Citizens’ Response Response of Authorities Environment and Infrastructure Citizens’ Response Response of Authorities Environment and Infrastructure Citizens’ Response Response of Authorities Environment and Infrastructure Citizens’ Response Response of Authorities Environment and Infrastructure Citizens’ Response Response of Authorities Environment and Infrastructure Table A3. W1,k, W2,l , andW3,m in the Application of EvacuAid in the Netherlands Conditional Conditional Conditional Parameter Probability Parameter Probability Parameter Probability Xxx Xxx Xxx 0.5 0.25 0.25 Ave Max Max 0.3 0.4 0.3 Min Max Max 0.5 0.25 0.25 Max Max Ave 0.4 0.2 0.4 Ave Max Ave 0.3 0.4 0.3 Min Max Ave 0.4 0.3 0.3 Xxx Xxx Min 0.4 0.2 0.4 Ave Max Min 0.3 0.4 0.3 Min Max Min 0.4 0.3 0.3 Max Ave Max 0.4 0.2 0.4 Ave Ave Max 0.3 0.2 0.5 Min Ave Max 0.4 0.3 0.3 Max Ave Ave 0.6 0.2 0.2 Ave Ave Ave 0.33 0.33 0.33 Min Ave Ave 0.6 0.2 0.2 Max Ave Min 0.4 0.3 0.3 Ave Ave Min 0.3 0.2 0.5 Min Ave Min 0.4 0.2 0.4 Xxx Xxx Max 0.4 0.3 0.3 Ave Min Max 0.3 0.4 0.3 Min Min Max 0.4 0.2 0.4 Max Min Ave 0.4 0.3 0.3 Ave Min Ave 0.3 0.4 0.3 Min Min Ave 0.4 0.2 0.4 Xxx Xxx Min 0.5 0.25 0.25 Ave Min Min 0.3 0.4 0.3 Min Min Min 0.5 0.25 0.25 Table A4. Loss of Life (Rounded to Tens) in Case of Preventive Evacuation Number Dike Ring Area Only the value for citizen response (C), response of authorities (A), or environment and infrastructure (I) has been changed based on the average situation (k, l, and m = 3). Dike Ring Area 14 Dike Ring Area 6 Dike Ring Area 43 τ ◦ 3 days 1 680 730 730 60 60 60 100 110 100 470 40 90 2 000 000 ...
Table A2. 1 Business case canvas of Living@Sea Appendix 3: Stakeholders of Living@Sea
Table A2. Total number of facilitiesa reporting given number of weeks, by zone, 2012 Weeksb Central Southern Puntland Somaliland 26 1 - - - 27 1 - - - 28 1 - - - 29 1 - - - 31 - 1 - -
Table A2. Courses to be attended at the Receiving Institution (Changes) Course unit code (if any) and title (as indicated in the catalogue of the Receiving Institution) (ECTS) credits Deleted or added unit? DELETED ADDED Name and signature/stamp Date Student Responsible person at the Sending Institution Responsible person at the Receiving Institution
Table A2. Exceptional changes to the Traineeship programme at the Receiving organisation to be approved by the student and the responsible persons at both Sending and Receiving organisation. Planned period of the mobility Start date / / End date / / Traineeship title: Number of working hours per week Detailed programme of the traineeship: Knowledge, skills and competences to be acquired by the trainee at the end of the traineeship: Monitoring/mentoring plan: Evaluation/assessment plan: Student/trainee Responsible person10 at Sending institution Supervisor11 at Receiving organisation name position trainee date signature Annex: End notes active hyperlinks:
Table A2. (To be approved by the student, the responsible person in the Sending Institution and the responsible person in the Receiving Organisation/Enterprise) Start date and end date of traineeship: from [day/month/year] …………………. to [day/month/year] ……………….. Traineeship title: … Number of working hours per week: … Detailed programme of the traineeship period: Knowledge, skills and competences to be acquired by the end of the traineeship (expected Learning Outcomes): Monitoring plan: Evaluation plan: By signing this document, the trainee, the Sending Institution and the Receiving Organisation/Enterprise confirm that they approve the Learning Agreement and that they will comply with all the arrangements agreed by all parties. The trainee and Receiving Organisation/Enterprise will communicate to the Sending Institution any problem or changes regarding the traineeship period. The Sending Institution and the trainee should also commit to what is set out in the Erasmus+ grant agreement. The institution undertakes to respect all the principles of the Erasmus Charter for Higher Education relating to traineeships (or the principles agreed in the partnership agreement for institutions located in Partner Countries). Commitment Name Email Position Date Signature Trainee Trainee Responsible person10 at the Sending Institution Supervisor11 at the Receiving Organisation Scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures are acceptable. After the Mobility Table D - Traineeship Certificate by the Receiving Organisation/Enterprise Start date and end date of traineeship: from [day/month/year] …………………. to [day/month/year] ……………….. Name of the trainee: Name of the Receiving Organisation/Enterprise: Sector of the Receiving Organisation/Enterprise: Address of the Receiving Organisation/Enterprise [street, city, country, phone, e-mail address], website: Traineeship title: Detailed programme of the traineeship period including tasks carried out by the trainee: Knowledge, skills (intellectual and practical) and competences acquired (achieved learning outcomes evaluated by Supervisor at the Receiving Organisation/Enterprise): Evaluation of the trainee: We would like to accept other students (and/or graduates) from Kaunas University of Technology under Erasmus+ programme in the future: Yes ☐ No ☐ We would like to discuss possibilities of the future collaboration with Kaunas University of Technology: Bilateral agreement: Yes ☐ No ☐ Lectures: Yes ☐ No ☐ Workshops: Yes ☐ No ☐ Other, please spec...
