Common use of Submission to Jurisdiction; Selection of Forum Clause in Contracts

Submission to Jurisdiction; Selection of Forum. EACH PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN ANY OF XXX XXXXXX XX XXX XXXXX XX XXX XXXX LOCATED IN NEW YORK COUNTY OR ANY OF THE FEDERAL COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA LOCATED IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”) AND (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO AND (IV) AGREES THAT SERVICE OF PROCESS UPON SUCH PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.4 OF THIS AGREEMENT.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Stock Purchase Agreement, Stock Purchase Agreement (RR Donnelley & Sons Co)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Submission to Jurisdiction; Selection of Forum. EACH PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF FOR ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY SHALL BE BROUGHT IN ANY OF XXX XXXXXX XX XXX XXXXX XX XXX XXXX LOCATED IN NEW YORK COUNTY OR ANY OF THE FEDERAL COURTS OF EITHER THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA LOCATED IN DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR IN A NEW YORK STATE COURT SITTING IN NEW YORK COUNTY (THE EACH, A “CHOSEN COURTSCOURT), AND EACH PARTY IRREVOCABLY (A) AND (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS (AND OF THEIR APPROPRIATE APPELLATE COURTS), (IIB) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE EITHER CHOSEN COURTSCOURT, (IIIC) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION THAT THE SUCH CHOSEN COURTS ARE COURT IS AN INCONVENIENT FORUM FOR THE ACTION OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO PROCEEDING, AND (IVD) AGREES THAT THAT, IN ADDITION TO OTHER METHODS OF SERVICE PROVIDED BY LAW, SERVICE OF PROCESS UPON SUCH PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE, SUBJECT TO APPLICABLE LAW, IF NOTICE IS GIVEN PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.4 6.01 OF THIS AGREEMENT, AND THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF SUCH SERVICE OF PROCESS SHALL BE AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 6.01.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Sale Agreement (Juhl Wind, Inc), Sale Agreement (Juhl Wind, Inc)

Submission to Jurisdiction; Selection of Forum. EACH PARTY HERETO (A) AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN ANY OF XXX XXXXXX XX XXX XXXXX XX XXX XXXX LOCATED IN NEW YORK COUNTY OR ANY OF THE FEDERAL COURTS OF (I) THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF AMERICA PENNSYLVANIA OR IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH COURT LACKS SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OVER THE ACT OR PROCEEDING, (II) IN AN APPROPRIATE STATE COURT LOCATED IN DAUPHIN COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA (SUCH COURT IS HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (THE “"CHOSEN COURTS”) COURT" AND (IB) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTSCOURT, (IIC) WAIVES WAIVES, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTSCOURT, (IIID) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION ARGUMENT THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE COURT IS AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO THERETO, AND (IVE) AGREES THAT SERVICE OF OR PROCESS UPON SUCH ANY PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.4 16 OF THIS AGREEMENT.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Assumption Agreement (Aureus Inc), Assignment and Assumption Agreement (Aureus Inc)

Submission to Jurisdiction; Selection of Forum. EACH PARTY HERETO (A) AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN ANY OF XXX XXXXXX XX XXX XXXXX XX XXX XXXX LOCATED IN NEW YORK COUNTY OR ANY OF THE FEDERAL COURTS OF (I) THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF AMERICA COLORADO OR IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH COURT LACKS SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OVER THE ACTION OR PROCEEDING, (II) IN AN APPROPRIATE STATE COURT LOCATED IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DENVER COUNTY, COLORADO (SUCH COURT IS HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE “CHOSEN COURTSCOURT”) AND (IB) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTSCOURT, (IIC) WAIVES WAIVES, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTSCOURT, (IIID) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION ARGUMENT THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE COURT IS AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO THERETO, AND (IVE) AGREES THAT SERVICE OF OR PROCESS UPON SUCH ANY PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.4 16 OF THIS AGREEMENT.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Assignment and Assumption Agreement, Assignment and Assumption Agreement (Silicon Graphics International Corp)

Submission to Jurisdiction; Selection of Forum. EACH PARTY HERETO (A) AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN ANY OF XXX XXXXXX XX XXX XXXXX XX XXX XXXX LOCATED IN NEW YORK COUNTY OR ANY OF THE FEDERAL COURTS OF (I) THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF AMERICA LOCATED CALIFORNIA, SAN JXXX DIVISION, OR IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EVENT THAT SUCH COURT LACKS SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OVER THE ACTION OR PROCEEDING, (II) IN AN APPROPRIATE CALIFORNIA STATE COURT IN SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA (SUCH FEDERAL OR STATE COURT IN SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA IS HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE “CHOSEN COURTSCOURT”) AND (IB) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTSCOURT, (IIC) WAIVES WAIVES, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTSCOURT, (IIID) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION ARGUMENT THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE COURT IS AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO THERETO, AND (IVE) AGREES THAT SERVICE OF OR PROCESS UPON SUCH ANY PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.4 11 OF THIS AGREEMENT.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Foreclosure Sale Agreement (MultiCell Technologies, Inc.)

Submission to Jurisdiction; Selection of Forum. EACH ANY JUDICIAL PROCEEDING BROUGHT AGAINST ANY PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY ACTION DISPUTE UNDER OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY MATTER RELATED HERETO SHALL BE BROUGHT IN THE FEDERAL OR STATE COURTS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, AND, BY EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF THIS AGREEMENT, EACH OF THE PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN ANY OF XXX XXXXXX XX XXX XXXXX XX XXX XXXX LOCATED IN NEW YORK COUNTY OR ANY OF THE FEDERAL COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA LOCATED IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”) AND (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO ACCEPTS THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF SUCH COURTS AND IRREVOCABLY AGREES TO BE BOUND BY ANY JUDGMENT (AS FINALLY ADJUDICATED) RENDERED THEREBY IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT. EACH OF THE CHOSEN COURTSPARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT SHALL APPOINT THE CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY OR A SIMILAR ENTITY (THE "AGENT") AS AGENT TO RECEIVE ON ITS BEHALF SERVICE OF PROCESS IN ANY PROCEEDING IN ANY SUCH COURT IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE, AND EACH OF THE PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT SHALL MAINTAIN THE APPOINTMENT OF SUCH AGENT (IIOR A SUBSTITUTE AGENT) FROM AND AFTER THE DATE HEREOF. THE FOREGOING CONSENTS TO JURISDICTION AND APPOINTMENTS OF AGENT TO RECEIVE SERVICE OF PROCESS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE GENERAL CONSENTS TO SERVICE OF PROCESS IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE FOR ANY PURPOSE EXCEPT AS PROVIDED ABOVE AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO CONFER RIGHTS ON ANY PERSON OTHER THAN THE PARTIES HERETO. EACH PARTY HEREBY WAIVES ANY OBJECTION TO LAYING IT MAY HAVE BASED ON LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION, IMPROPER VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO AND (IV) AGREES THAT SERVICE OF PROCESS UPON SUCH PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.4 OF THIS AGREEMENTNON-CONVENIENS.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Limited Liability Company Agreement (Leucadia National Corp)

Submission to Jurisdiction; Selection of Forum. EACH PARTY HERETO (A) AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN ANY OF XXX XXXXXX XX XXX XXXXX XX XXX XXXX LOCATED IN NEW YORK COUNTY OR ANY OF THE FEDERAL COURTS OF (I) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA LOCATED IN DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FLORIDA, (II) IN AN APPROPRIATE FLORIDA STATE COURT IN TAMPA, FLORIDA (SUCH FEDERAL OR STATE COURT IN TAMPA, FLORIDA IS HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE “CHOSEN COURTSCOURT”) AND (IB) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTSCOURT, (IIC) WAIVES WAIVES, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTSCOURT, (IIID) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION ARGUMENT THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE COURT IS AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO THERETO, AND (IVE) AGREES THAT SERVICE OF OR PROCESS UPON SUCH ANY PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.4 9.5 OF THIS AGREEMENT.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Asset Purchase Agreement (Innovaro, Inc.)

Submission to Jurisdiction; Selection of Forum. EACH PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN ANY OF XXX XXXXXX XX XXX XXXXX XX XXX XXXX LOCATED IN NEW YORK COUNTY OR ANY OF THE FEDERAL COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA LOCATED IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (THE “CHOSEN COURTS) AND (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO AND (IV) AGREES THAT SERVICE OF PROCESS UPON SUCH PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.4 OF THIS AGREEMENT.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Agreement and Plan of Merger (Visant Corp)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Submission to Jurisdiction; Selection of Forum. EACH PARTY HERETO (A) AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN ANY OF XXX XXXXXX XX XXX XXXXX XX XXX XXXX LOCATED IN NEW YORK COUNTY OR ANY OF THE FEDERAL COURTS OF (I) THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF AMERICA MASSACHUSETTS OR IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH COURT LACKS SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OVER THE ACTION OR PROCEEDING, (II) IN AN APPROPRIATE STATE COURT LOCATED IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT COUNTY OF NEW YORK SUFFOLK, MASSACHUSETTS (THE “CHOSEN COURTSCOURT) AND ), (IB) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTSCOURT, (IIC) WAIVES WAIVES, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTSCOURT, (IIID) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION ARGUMENT THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE COURT IS AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO THERETO, AND (IVE) AGREES THAT SERVICE OF PROCESS UPON SUCH ANY PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.4 13 OF THIS AGREEMENT.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Asset Purchase Agreement (Aerpio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)

Submission to Jurisdiction; Selection of Forum. EACH PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN ANY STATE OR FEDERAL COURT OF XXX XXXXXX XX XXX XXXXX XX XXX XXXX LOCATED COMPETENT JURISDICTION SITTING IN NEW YORK COUNTY OR ANY OF THE FEDERAL COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA LOCATED IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”) GERMANY AND (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN SUCH COURTS, (IIU) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION TO OF LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN SUCH COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN SUCH COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM FORM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO HERETO, AND (IV) AGREES THAT SERVICE OF PROCESS UPON SUCH PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.4 OF THIS AGREEMENT8.6 HEREOF.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Exclusive Sale Agreement (Omnicorder Technologies Inc)

Submission to Jurisdiction; Selection of Forum. EACH PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN ANY OF XXX THX XXXXXX XX XXX XXXXX XX XXX XXXX LOCATED XOCATED IN NEW YORK COUNTY OR ANY OF THE FEDERAL COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA LOCATED IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”) AND (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO AND (IV) AGREES THAT SERVICE OF PROCESS UPON SUCH PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.4 OF THIS AGREEMENT.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Stock Purchase Agreement (Visant Corp)

Submission to Jurisdiction; Selection of Forum. EACH PARTY HERETO (A) AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN ANY OF XXX XXXXXX XX XXX XXXXX XX XXX XXXX LOCATED IN NEW YORK COUNTY OR ANY OF THE FEDERAL COURTS OF (I) THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF AMERICA COLORADO OR IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH COURT LACKS SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OVER THE ACTION OR PROCEEDING, (II) IN AN APPROPRIATE STATE COURT LOCATED IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DENVER COUNTY, COLORADO (SUCH COURT IS HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE “CHOSEN COURTSCOURT”) AND (IB) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTSCOURT, (IIC) WAIVES WAIVES, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTSCOURT, (IIID) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION ARGUMENT THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE COURT IS AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO THERETO, AND (IVE) AGREES THAT SERVICE OF OR PROCESS UPON SUCH ANY PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.4 13 OF THIS AGREEMENT.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Secured Creditor Asset Purchase Agreement (XZERES Corp.)

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.