Sublicense Limitation Sample Clauses
A Sublicense Limitation clause restricts the licensee’s ability to grant sublicenses of the licensed rights to third parties. Typically, this clause specifies whether sublicensing is permitted at all, and if so, under what conditions or with what approvals, such as requiring the licensor’s prior written consent. By clearly defining the boundaries of sublicensing, this clause helps the licensor maintain control over the distribution and use of their intellectual property, preventing unauthorized or unintended third-party use.
Sublicense Limitation. Wyeth-Ayerst acknowledges the existence of Aviron's license under the Michigan Agreement, and acknowledges and agrees that Aviron may only grant to Wyeth-Ayerst such rights as Aviron is permitted to grant pursuant to the Michigan Agreement.
Sublicense Limitation. Acorda and/or its Affiliates agree to use good faith efforts to avoid an economic arrangement in the deals with their sublicensees that provide for [***]. For the avoidance of doubt any sublicenses executed by Acorda and/or its Affiliates relating to the Licensed Patents may be compared against similar stage and economic sector deals at a similar point in time and involving similar technology to determine if [***]. In addition, Acorda and/or its Affiliates shall not enter into cross-license arrangements with any Third Party sublicensee under the Licensed Patents whereby [***]. For clarity, cross-licenses received by Acorda and/or its Affiliates in the typical course of partnering transactions where each partner to the transaction grants the other partner a cross-license to enable each other to conduct collaborative in-house research and development [***]. For further clarity, grants of covenants not to ▇▇▇ under patent rights shall be deemed to be licenses or sublicenses, as appropriate, under this Section.
Sublicense Limitation. 26 10.2 Wyeth-Ayerst Obligations.....................................................26 10.3 Use of Aviron Product Materials..............................................27
Sublicense Limitation. Acorda and/or its Affiliates agree to use good faith efforts to avoid an economic arrangement in the deals with their sublicensees that provide for unreasonably large upfront and milestone payments, to the detriment of royalties. For the avoidance of doubt any sublicenses executed by Acorda and/or its Affiliates relating to the Licensed Patents may be compared against similar stage and economic sector deals at a similar point in time and involving similar technology to determine if the upfront and milestone payments are unreasonably large. In addition, Acorda and/or its Affiliates shall not enter into cross-license arrangements with any Third Party sublicensee under the Licensed Patents whereby Acorda and/or its Affiliates receive a cross-license under the Third Party sublicensee's rights as compensation for grant of a sublicense under the Licensed Patents, to the detriment of royalties, without prior written consent of Institutions, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld. For clarity, cross-licenses received by Acorda and/or its Affiliates in the typical course of partnering transactions where each partner to the transaction grants the other partner a cross-license to enable each other to conduct collaborative in-house research and development shall not be considered compensation for grant of a sublicense under the Licensed Patents. For further clarity, grants of covenants not to ▇▇▇ under patent rights shall be deemed to be licenses or sublicenses, as appropriate, under this Section.
Sublicense Limitation. CSL acknowledges the existence of Aviron's license under the Michigan Agreement and acknowledges and accepts that Aviron may only grant to CSL such rights as Aviron is permitted to grant pursuant to the Michigan Agreement.