Strength of Keys against Brute Force Attacks Clause Samples

Strength of Keys against Brute Force Attacks. ‌ The master keys and private keys are random and large. For example, with values of N = 7, m = 16, η = 6 and p = 31, there are 2634 possible master keys and 2208 private keys. A brute force attack is not feasible. One limitation in the original ▇▇▇▇’▇ scheme is that the pairwise key is only the same size as the data size of the master key elements. In our BYka scheme, the pairwise key size can be up to pNη2 integers ∈ [0, p − 1]. The BYka scheme can be viewed as a mechanism for two nodes to derive a common secret pairwise key set R consisting of Nη2 integers from which to construct their pairwise key. The number of possible keys, the “key space”, is limited by the number of possible combinations of the Nη2 integers. To determine the key space size, we consider the following partitioning problem. Given a row of Nη2 items, we wish to partition them into p groups. This is illustrated in Figure 1 for the case of partitioning eight items into four groups. To create the partitions, we first insert (p − 1) items into the row, so that there are now (Nη2 + p − 1) items. If any (p − 1) items are now removed, (p − 1) .Nη2 + p − 1Σ gaps would be created, separating the remaining items into p groups as desired. Let group g0 contain the integer zero, g1 contain one, g2 contain two, etc. The total number of integers is always Nη2. The number of ways to remove (p − 1) items from (Nη2 + p − 1) gives the key space size as follows, = log2 p − 1 Σ. ΣΣ2 Nη + p − 1 p − 1 bits

Related to Strength of Keys against Brute Force Attacks

  • Violence Against Women The parties hereby recognize and share the concern that women uniquely face situations of violence or abuse in their personal lives that may affect their attendance or performance at work. A woman who is in an abusive or violent personal or domestic situation will not be subjected to discipline without giving full consideration to the facts in the case of each individual and the circumstances surrounding the incident otherwise supportive of discipline. This statement of intent is subject to a standard of good faith on the part of the Employer, the Union and the affected employees and will not be utilized by the Union or the employees to subvert the application of otherwise appropriate disciplinary measures.

  • Complaints Against Teachers Communication between the Community and the School ideally should be such that most complaints may be resolved through personal conferences at the School level. Various avenues of contact between teacher, pupil, parent, principal and other appropriate staff personnel should be pursued before using the formal procedures outlined below. The following process shall not be used when allegations involve legal or criminal violations or allegations of misconduct towards a student, such as abuse or discrimination. Such allegations shall be investigated in accordance with board policy and in conjunction with the authorities, consistent with principles of due process. 1. The Complainant shall be given a copy of this Part II, Section J and be told that there are contractual requirements for the District to follow. 2. If such conferences do not lead to understanding and resolution of problems involved, a parent may pursue further action by submitting a complaint against a teacher, which must be submitted in writing to the principal of the school. The principal shall give a copy to the teacher. Likewise, the teacher may request in writing to the principal that such a written complaint must be filed or the matter shall be considered closed. The principal shall give a copy to the parent. 3. After a written complaint is filed, if requested by the complainant or the teacher, a meeting involving the teacher, the principal, and the complainant will be arranged as soon as possible to discuss the complaint. 4. If it is not resolved at that level to the satisfaction of the Complainant, the Complainant may appeal to the Superintendent. 5. If it is still unresolved to the satisfaction of the Complainant, the Complainant may appeal to the Board of Education.

  • Entities that Discriminate Against Firearm and Ammunition Industries In accordance with Senate Bill 19, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., pursuant to Section 2274.002 of the Texas Government Code (relating to prohibition on contracts with companies that discriminate against firearm and ammunition industries), Contractor verifies that: (1) it does not, and will not for the duration of the Contract, have a practice, policy, guidance, or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association or (2) the verification required by Section 2274.002 of the Texas Government Code does not apply to the Contract. If circumstances relevant to this provision change during the course of the Contract, Contractor shall promptly notify System Agency.

  • Claims Against Third Parties The Licensee shall, as soon as it becomes aware, give DACS in writing full particulars of any infringements or violations of any of DACS’ / the Artist’s rights in the Work.

  • SAFEGUARD AGAINST FRAUD 11.1 The Supplier shall take all reasonable steps, in accordance with Good Industry Practice, to prevent any fraudulent activity (including Fraud) by the Supplier and the Supplier’s Staff (which for the purposes of this Clause 11 (Safeguard Against Fraud) shall include its shareholders holding in excess of the fifty (50) percent of the entire issued share capital of the Supplier and directors). 11.2 The Supplier shall notify the Authority immediately if it has reason to suspect that any Fraud has occurred, is occurring or is likely to occur save where complying with this provision would cause the Supplier or its employees to commit an offence under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 or the Terrorism Act 2000. 11.3 If the Supplier or the Supplier’s Staff commits Fraud in relation to this Framework Agreement, a Call-Off Contract or any other contract with the Crown (including the Authority), the Authority may: 11.3.1 terminate this Framework Agreement with immediate effect by giving the Supplier notice in writing, and recover from the Supplier the amount of any loss suffered by the Authority resulting from such termination, including the cost reasonably incurred by the Authority of making other arrangements for the supply of the Services and any additional expenditure incurred by the Authority throughout the remainder of the Term; or 11.3.2 recover in full from the Supplier and the Supplier shall on demand indemnify in full and hold the Authority harmless from and against any other loss sustained by the Authority in consequence of any breach of this Clause 11 (Safeguard Against Fraud).