Stage B Sample Clauses
Stage B. Appeal against Stage A process Where an appellant believes that there has been a significant/substantial flaw in Stage A, an appeal may be raised against that process. There can be no other grounds for using the Stage B process. Notification that an appeal is being brought must be submitted, in writing, to ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, Framework Agreement Project Manager, within 7 working days of the date specified on the letter notifying the outcome of Stage A. Once notification of the appeal is received, an Appeal Form will be issued to the appellant for completion. Again, the appellant will be asked to state the grounds on which the appeal is being made and provide information to support this. (An appropriate timescale for the completion and return of this form will be agreed between Human Resources and the appellant). Within 10 working days of receipt of the completed Appeal Form, a Process Appeal Panel will be convened. The Panel will comprise an executive member of the Office of the Principal (Chair), a Head of School/Unit (unconnected with the appellant) and two representatives of the appropriate Trades Union, none of whom will have been involved in the previous evaluation of the post. In considering an appeal at this stage, the Process Appeal Panel will review the written submission from the appellant, and will normally call upon all relevant parties to attend a hearing. (Appellants have the right to be accompanied by a representative of the appropriate Trades Union or a work colleague. The accompanying person may confer and consult with the appellant, and ask and answer questions on their behalf). The Process Appeal Panel cannot alter the grade assigned, but it can refer the post back for reevaluation by another freshly constituted Role Analysis Review Panel, chaired by the Director of Human Resources, if it considers that the process leading to the grading of the post has been flawed. The Process Appeal Panel’s decision will be made by its members with its chair exercising, if necessary, a casting vote. The Panel will write to the appellant within 7 working days of the meeting to advise them of the outcome of the appeal. The outcome of the Process Appeal Panel and any second Role Analysis Review Panel will be final. Harmonisation of conditions This paper details the agreement reached between the University of St ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, AMICUS, UCU, and UNISON on the Harmonisation of Terms and Conditions. Harmonisation of hours (to 36.25 hours per week for full time employees)...
Stage B. Strategic Plan to for Efficiency and Advancement of the System
Stage B. The project team will conduct two additional stakeholder meetings that bring the technical, policy and business stakeholders together for facilitated discussions to build consensus and identify appropriate project goals. The project team will coordinate these meetings, as well as RSVPs, identify appropriate venues, create sign-in sheets, take notes and develop summaries for each meeting, as well as assist with facilitation. Additional Property Owner/Stakeholder Coordination: It is anticipated that the following, additional meetings may be needed to coordinate and gain consensus for the recommended alternative in the early stage of the project. Each will include time to prepare for and document each meeting. For our current, worst-case alignment scenario, there are forty-five (45) possible properties to be impacted along the corridor. It is assumed that we would plan for and attend up to fifteen (15) meetings with affected property owners along the corridor throughout the alignment analysis stage of the project. Prepare for and attend one (1) separate meeting with NCTCOG to discuss their Collin County Strategic Roadway Initiative, projected traffic volumes within the project limits, demographics, and development of traffic numbers for use in microsimulations for the corridor. Prepare for and attend up to one (1) meeting with bicycle groups that utilize the corridor. Identified are the following: Bike DFW, Plano Bicycle Association, and Shawnee Trail Cycling Club. We anticipate a need to hold one (1) separate meeting/work session with ▇▇▇▇▇ Crossing early in the project to discuss concerns, options, impacts, etc. (▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ – EDC; ▇▇▇▇▇ Cable – City Secretary; ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ – Mayor; Marley ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ – Mayor Pro Tem; ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ – Fire Chief) We anticipate a need to hold one (1) meeting with the City of Princeton’s consultant currently working on PS&E for an eastern segment of the corridor within the southern limits of Princeton. Note: COUNTY may request virtual stakeholder coordination meetings in lieu of in-person meetings. Microsoft Teams, WebEx, or other COUNTY approved application will be used to host the meetings.