Specific Criteria. The following specific criteria will apply: • Single hull vessels are accepted on an exceptional basis only. • Vessels over 15 years old must have a CAP 1 or CAP 2 rating issued by an acceptable classification society. • Tankers over 15 years old must have been dry-docked within the last 36 months. Under Water Inspections in Lieu of Drydocking (UWILD) are not acceptable. • Conditions of Class will be closely scrutinized. Vessels that will not be considered/accepted
Specific Criteria. A candidate's achievements in Article 21.02 (a) shall be measured primarily by:
Specific Criteria a) New or Replacement Pole Height A new or replacement pole may be installed without zoning review if one of the two height requirements is met:
Specific Criteria. Solicitation Responses shall be consistently evaluated and scored in accordance with the following criteria.
Specific Criteria. Applications will be evaluated and scored in accordance with the factors required by authorizing legislation and by this procurement package using Exhibit G, Evaluation Score Tool.
Specific Criteria a) New Pole Height A new wireless support structure may be installed without zoning review if one of the two height requirements are met, see A.R.S. § 9-592(I) and A.R.S. § 9-592(J):
Specific Criteria. In addition to the General Criteria set forth for all personnel, the specific content of job descriptions will be considered in preparing evaluation reports.
Specific Criteria. This scholarship is: ☐ a One-time only award for year ☐ Renewable* for years *a renewable award is given to the same student for up to four years depending on student’s scholastic performance and full-time status. If it is a renewable scholarship, please also indicate if it is to be a one-time or an annual award (i.e., one time for 2, 3, or 4 years, two or more times, for 2, 3, of 4 years). Dollar amount of scholarship: $ Number of scholarships sponsor will award at this amount awarded each year: If you donate a larger amount…$5,000, for example, and would like it distributed at $1,250 each year for four years, please indicate distribution amount and frequency here: Scholarship Presentation: ☐ Sponsor would like the following person to present the scholarship to student(s) during an award ceremony at the student’s high school in May: ☐ Sponsor authorizes a representative from the Sunnyside District Alumni Association or the school to present scholarship to student on behalf of the sponsor at the annual scholarship reception. If donor attends scholarship reception, s/he would like to participate in presentation and photo opportunity. ☐ Sponsor Options: I elect the following option as my level of participation in this scholarship program: ☐ BASIC Sponsor Selects and Distributes Funds Sponsor will use the central scholarship application and would like the Scholarship Committee to prescreen applications and provide information in one of the following ways: ☐ Provide (number of) nominations/applications to sponsor for review; OR ☐ Provide applications for all students who are eligible for the sponsor’s scholarship. Sponsor will select student(s) and notify the Scholarship Committee Chair who would proceed with notifying the student with a formal award letter and information on steps to accept award and confirm their attendance at post-secondary institution of choice. Sponsor will distribute funds directly to the student and/or postsecondary institution based on the agreement made with student. ☐ ALL INCLUSIVE Scholarship Committee Selects and Distributes Funds Sponsor designates the Sunnyside District Alumni Association to administer all aspects of the scholarship process on the sponsor’s behalf. This includes distributing the central scholarship application, prescreening for sponsor’s criteria, a scholarship committee selecting student(s) for the sponsor, notification of awards, and distribution of funds. Sponsor may choose to participate in the selection comm...
Specific Criteria i. The following criteria are the bases for judgments to be made regarding the quality of performance of an Officer of Extension. They provide the basis for decisions on appointment, reappointment and promotion. Officers of Extension should be evaluated annually and the results summarized in writing and considered in all reappointments and promotions. In evaluating the performance of each Officer of Extension with respect to these criteria, reasonable flexibility should be exercised, balancing, where the case requires, heavier assignments and responsibilities in area against lighter assign- ments and responsibilities in another. Documented consistency of performance over a period of years is considered an excellent indicator of future performance. The University values effective collaboration in, and synthesis of, teaching, research and other scholarly endeavors and supports and encourages Officers of Extension who contribute effectively to teaching efforts. When documenting evidence of accomplishment that resulted from a team collaboration, the Officer of Extension should: (1) explain the significance of the team accomplishment; (2) identify collaborators, whether within the University or outside institutions and agencies; and (3) describe with specificity his or her own role in the team effort. Accomplishments and elaboration of a team effort should only be reported when the Officer of Extension’s contribution is substantial.
