Sources of Evaluative Data Sample Clauses

Sources of Evaluative Data. A. The Initial Granting of Continuing Contract Sub-Committee (IGCC) shall use multiple sources of data to complete the portfolio evaluation. B. Such data shall include, at a minimum, the following items and shall be provided by the faculty member in the portfolio evaluation: i. Introductory reflective summary that supports the candidates granting of continuing contract; ii. Current Curriculum Vitae; iii. Evaluation forms from the last four (4) consecutive years of performance at a proficient or better level; iv. Supporting evidence of performance in teaching and learning, (to include Student Opinion Surveys (SOS) and Student Success data), professional development and scholarship, community, college, and professional service; v. Letter of support or non-support from the Academic ▇▇▇▇/Supervising Administrator; vi. Letters of support from colleagues (this is optional with a maximum of three). C. Other relevant data may be considered provided the source and accuracy can be established and documented.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Sources of Evaluative Data. A. The Continuing Contract Committee shall use multiple sources of data to complete the portfolio evaluation. B. Such data shall include, at a minimum, the following items and shall be provided by the faculty member in the portfolio evaluation: i. Introductory reflective summary that supports the candidates granting of continuing contract; ii. Current Curriculum Vitae; iii. Evaluation forms from the last four consecutive years of performance at a proficient or better level; iv. Supporting evidence of performance in teaching and learning, professional development and scholarship, community, college, and professional service; v. Letter of support or non-support from the Academic ▇▇▇▇/Supervising Administrator; vi. Letters of support from colleagues (this is optional with a maximum of three). C. Other relevant data may be considered provided the source and accuracy can be established and documented.
View Source

Related to Sources of Evaluative Data

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Prices and Services Billing 8.1 SCHEDULE OF PRICES AND TERMS Competitive Supplier agrees to provide Firm Full-Requirements Power Supply and other related services as expressly set forth herein in accordance with the prices and terms included in EXHIBIT A to this ESA, which exhibit is hereby incorporated by reference into this ESA.

  • Project Information describing each Eligible Project that started, ended, or was ongoing in the reporting year.