SIP Evaluation and Scoring Process Clause Samples

SIP Evaluation and Scoring Process. Proposers that wish to participate in the SIP Program must provide a SIP Proposal on the SIP Proposal Response Form, located in Appendix D. Participation in the SIP Program by submission of a SIP Proposal constitutes Proposer’s acknowledgement and agreement that it shall comply with the SIP Rules and Regulations as may be amended during the term of a Covered Contract. If a Proposer does not follow these submission requirements, the SFPUC may deem such SIP Proposal non-responsive. SFPUC SIP staff will confirm that the Proposed Commitment type and amount conform to the requirements of this RFP; that each Proposed Commitment is within a Program Area; that each Proposed Commitment is within the Geographic Area(s) specified in this RFP; and that Proposer has identified a SIP Executive-in-Charge and a SIP Coordinator (compliant Proposed Commitment). Only a compliant Proposed Commitment is eligible for evaluation and application of the SIP bonus. Staff, acting as a selection panel, will assign a Commitment value to each compliant Proposed Commitment, calculated as total Direct Financial Contributions plus total Volunteer Hours (at a rate of $150/hour). The SFPUC will assign a total Commitment value to each SIP Proposal. The SFPUC will not include non-compliant Proposed Commitments or portions of Proposed Commitments in the evaluation or the calculation of Commitment values. Notwithstanding, the SFPUC reserves the right in its sole discretion to waive nonmaterial defects in a SIP Proposal. Proposers shall not add any language conditioning the delivery of its Social Impact Commitments. Proposed Social Impact Commitments unequivocally bind the Contractor to its Social Impact Commitments. If a Proposer includes language conditioning delivery of its Social Impact Commitments in its SIP Proposal Form, the SFPUC will deem the SIP Proposal non-compliant, and Proposer will not be eligible to receive any SIP bonus points. A. Evaluation Panel

Related to SIP Evaluation and Scoring Process

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Start-Up and Synchronization Consistent with the mutually acceptable procedures of the Developer and Connecting Transmission Owner, the Developer is responsible for the proper synchronization of the Large Generating Facility to the New York State Transmission System in accordance with NYISO and Connecting Transmission Owner procedures and requirements.

  • Monitoring and Evaluation a. The AGENCY shall expeditiously provide to the COUNTY upon request, all data needed for the purpose of monitoring, evaluating and/or auditing the program(s). This data shall include, but not be limited to, clients served, services provided, outcomes achieved, information on materials and services delivered, and any other data required, in the sole discretion of the COUNTY, that may be required to adequately monitor and evaluate the services provided under this Contract. Monitoring shall be performed in accordance with COUNTY’S established Noncompliance Standards, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Attachment “C”. b. The AGENCY agrees to permit persons duly authorized by the COUNTY to interview any clients and all current and/or former employees of the AGENCY to be assured of the AGENCY’S satisfactory performance of the terms of this Contract. c. Following such evaluation, monitoring, and/or audit, the COUNTY will deliver a report of its findings and recommendations with regard to the AGENCY’S conformance with this Contract’s terms and conditions to the AGENCY and/or Board of Directors’ President, and members, whenever applicable. If deficiencies are noted, a written notice of corrective action will be issued to the AGENCY which will specify deficiencies and provide a timeline for correction of those deficiencies. Within the designated timeframe in the written notice of corrective action, the AGENCY shall submit to the COUNTY’S CCC manager (“Manager”), or their designee, a corrective action plan to rectify all deficiencies identified by the COUNTY. d. Failure by the AGENCY to correct noted deficiencies, as outlined in the written notice of corrective action, may result in the AGENCY being deemed in breach of the Contract terms. e. The AGENCY shall cooperate with the COUNTY on all reviews to ensure compliance with all applicable COUNTY guidelines and requirements for general fund recipients.

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference.