Simplification Sample Clauses

A simplification clause is designed to clarify and streamline the interpretation of a contract by specifying that certain terms, phrases, or provisions should be understood in their most straightforward or commonly accepted sense. In practice, this clause may direct that legal jargon, technical terms, or ambiguous language be interpreted in a way that avoids unnecessary complexity or confusion. Its core function is to reduce the risk of misunderstandings or disputes over contract language, ensuring that all parties have a clear and shared understanding of their rights and obligations.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Simplification. 2.1 The Parties agree to co-operate and use all reasonable endeavours to implement Simplification in accordance with the terms set out in the Public Documents.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Simplification. The Amsterdam Treaty removed from the European Treaties all provisions that the passage of time had rendered void or obsolete, while ensuring that this did not affect the legal effects derived from them in the past. It also renumbered the Treaty articles. For legal and political reasons the Treaty was signed and submitted for ratification in the form of amendments to the existing Treaties.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Simplification provisions concerning Member States contributions which are drafted in detail in the Internal Agreement do not need to be repeated in the Financial Regulation. Provisions which mirrored some articles of the implementing Rules of the general Financial Regulation laid down in Regulation (EC, Euratom) 2342/2002 have been replaced by a reference to the concerned article(s) of that Regulation. Moreover, provisions which mirror some articles of the general Financial Regulation and need further clarification or implementing rules have been completed with a reference to the applicable articles of Regulation (EC, Euratom) 2342/2002. 2007/0154 (CNC) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to the Partnership Agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 20001 and revised in Luxembourg on 25 June 20052 (hereinafter the 'ACP-EC Agreement'), Having regard to Council Decision 2001/822/EC of 27 November 2001 on the association of the overseas countries and territories with the European Community (the 'Overseas Association Decision') 3, amended by Council Decision 2007/249/EC of 19 March 20074, and in particular the fourth paragraph of Article 23 thereof Having regard to Decision No 1/2006 of the ACP-EC Council of Ministers of 2 June 2006 specifying the multiannual financial framework for the period 2008 to 2013 and modifying the revised ACP-EC Agreement5, Having regard to the Internal Agreement between the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on the financing of Community aid under the multiannual financial framework for the period 2008 to 2013 in accordance with the ACP-EC Agreement and on the allocation of financial assistance for the Overseas Countries and Territories to which Part Four of the EC Treaty applies6 (hereinafter the 'Internal Agreement') and in particular Article 10 (2) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission7, Having regard to the opinion of the Court of Auditors8, Having regard to the opinion of the European Investment Bank9, 1 OJ L 317, 15.12.2000, p. 3. 2 OJ L 287, 28.10.2005, p. 4. 3 OJ L 314, 30.11.2001, p. 1. 4 OJ L 109, 26.4.2007, p. 33. 5 OJ L 247, 9.9.2006, p. 22. 6 OJ L 247, 9.9.2006, p. 32. 7 OJ C , , p. .
View SourceView Similar (2)
Simplification. The three institutions confirm their commitment to use the legislative technique of recasting for the modification of existing legislation more frequently and in full respect of the provisions contained in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structure use of the recasting technique for legal acts. Where recast is not appropriate, the Commission will submit a proposal according to the provisions of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts as soon as possible after the adoption of a modifying act. If the Commission does not submit a proposal, it shall state the reasons for not doing so.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Simplification. The Supplier, through the Growth Hub, must map business support provision across Cheshire and Warrington, gathering data and working with its partners to review and harmonise schemes. The focus must be on improving access, identifying under- performing schemes and recommending appropriate remedies including closure as appropriate, as well as promoting those schemes which are proven to be most effective.
View Source
Simplification. Simplification is a central aim of Horizon 2020. It is to be reflected in its design, rules, financial management and implementation in order to attract a strong participation of universities, research centres, industry and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Simpler funding rules will reduce administrative costs for participants and decrease financial errors. A simplified funding model will be used for the reimbursement of activities. It will be based on a single reimbursement rate for eligible costs that will be applied to all activities within an action. The reimbursement would reach a maximum of 100 % of the total eligible costs of an action, with a ceiling of 70 % for those innovation actions closer to the market and for programme co-funded actions. Non-profit organisations will benefit a reimbursement of maximum 100% also in innovation actions. A flat rate of 25% of the total direct eligible costs will be reimbursed to cover indirect costs. Furthermore, the period between the deadline for the submission of project proposals and the conclusion of a grant agreement will be significantly shortened.
View Source
Simplification. The argument excessively simpli- fies a problem, usually regarding the cause, the consequence or the existence of choices.
View Source

Related to Simplification

  • Fraud, ▇▇▇▇▇ and Abuse If you have concerns about being billed for services you never received, or that your insurance information has been stolen or used by someone else, you may report potential health care fraud, waste or abuse to our Special Investigations Unit by using our confidential anti-fraud hotline at ▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ or by email at ▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇. You may also send an anonymous letter to us at: Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island Special Investigations Unit ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Providence RI, 02903

  • Implementation Arrangements Institutional Arrangements

  • Rights Protection Mechanisms and Abuse Mitigation ­‐ Registry Operator commits to implementing and performing the following protections for the TLD: i. In order to help registrars and registrants identify inaccurate data in the Whois database, Registry Operator will audit Whois data for accuracy on a statistically significant basis (this commitment will be considered satisfied by virtue of and for so long as ICANN conducts such audits). ii. Work with registrars and registrants to remediate inaccurate Whois data to help ensure a more accurate Whois database. Registry Operator reserves the right to cancel a domain name registration on the basis of inaccurate data, if necessary. iii. Establish and maintain a Domains Protected Marks List (DPML), a trademark protection service that allows rights holders to reserve registration of exact match trademark terms and terms that contain their trademarks across all gTLDs administered by Registry Operator under certain terms and conditions. iv. At no cost to trademark holders, establish and maintain a Claims Plus service, which is a notice protection mechanism that begins at the end of ICANN’s mandated Trademark Claims period. v. Bind registrants to terms of use that define and prohibit illegal or abusive activity. vi. Limit the use of proxy and privacy registration services in cases of malfeasance. vii. Consistent with the terms of this Registry Agreement, reserve the right to exclude from distribution any registrars with a history of non-­‐compliance with the terms of the Registrar Accreditation Agreement. viii. Registry Operator will be properly resourced to perform these protections.

  • Procedures for Providing NP Through Full NXX Code Migration Where a Party has activated an entire NXX for a single Customer, or activated at least eighty percent (80%) of an NXX for a single Customer, with the remaining numbers in that NXX either reserved for future use by that Customer or otherwise unused, if such Customer chooses to receive Telephone Exchange Service from the other Party, the first Party shall cooperate with the second Party to have the entire NXX reassigned in the LERG (and associated industry databases, routing tables, etc.) to an End Office operated by the second Party. Such transfer will be accomplished with appropriate coordination between the Parties and subject to appropriate industry lead times for movements of NXXs from one switch to another. Neither Party shall charge the other in connection with this coordinated transfer.

  • Information Technology Enterprise Architecture Requirements If this Contract involves information technology-related products or services, the Contractor agrees that all such products or services are compatible with any of the technology standards found at ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇▇/iot/2394.htm that are applicable, including the assistive technology standard. The State may terminate this Contract for default if the terms of this paragraph are breached.