Security Functionality Clause Samples

Security Functionality. Table III shows the security capabilities of the proposed protocol as compared to the protocols presented in [15], [16], and [17]. As discussed in Section II, the protocol presented in [16] is vulnerable to forgery attacks, and hence it cannot ensure mutual authentication. In general, to keep the latency low and ensure seamless services, the MEC operator supports the UAVs by using computational infrastructure positioned close to the needs to use the PUF response Rx and the random number wireless infrastructure. However, in the protocol presented in Ns , i.e., LAIu = EL h(Rx Ns ) and after decoding LAIu from EL, the USP checks this LAIu with the location of the MEC operator IDMEC . In this way, the USP can keep track of the current location of the UAV and address any disputes [15], if a MEC node sends false signals (e.g., in terms of its location) to an UAV, there is no way to detect that. In contrast, the proposed protocol can easily detect such attempts by using the parameter LAIu . Next, in the protocols proposed in [15], [16], and [17], the UAV needs to store all the secret information (e.g., keys) in its memory. Thus, if an adversary obtains physical access to the drone, it can obtain the secret key from the memory of the UAV or change the settings of the UAV. Then, if the adversary uses this compromised UAV to send false information or manipulated information to the USP, the USP will not be able detect such attacks. Therefore, the protocols presented in [15], [16], and [17], cannot ensure security against physical attacks. Finally, unlike [15], [16], and [17], the proposed scheme does not use any timestamps to ensure security against replay attacks.
View Source
Security Functionality. Table III shows the security capabilities of the proposed protocol as compared to the protocols presented in [15], [16], and [17]. As discussed in Section II, the protocol presented in [16] is vulnerable to forgery attacks, and hence it cannot ensure mutual authentication. In general, to keep the latency low and ensure seamless services, the MEC operator supports the UAVs by using computational infrastructure positioned close to the wireless infrastructure. However, in the protocol presented in [15], if a MEC node sends false signals (e.g., in terms of its location) to an UAV, there is no way to detect that. In contrast, the proposed protocol can easily detect such attempts by using the parameter LAIu . Next, in the protocols proposed in [15], [16], and [17], the UAV needs to store all the secret information (e.g., keys) in its memory. Thus, if an adversary obtains physical access to the drone, it can obtain the secret key from the memory of the UAV or change the settings of the UAV. Then, if the adversary uses this compromised UAV to send false information or manipulated information to the USP, the USP will not be able detect such attacks. Therefore, the protocols presented in [15], [16], and [17], cannot ensure security against physical attacks. Finally, unlike [15], [16], and [17], the proposed scheme does not use any timestamps to ensure security against replay attacks.
View Source

Related to Security Functionality

  • Future Functionality You agree that Your purchases are not contingent on the delivery of any future functionality or features, or dependent on any oral or written public comments made by Us regarding future functionality or features.

  • Functionality Customer is entitled to additional functionality previously purchased or bundled with the software if available in the version or update released on or after the start date of the Agreement. Customer acknowledges that certain functionality in current and previous software versions may not be available in future upgrades. Added functionality may require additional paid services (clinical and technical) to configure and support.

  • Interoperability To the extent required by applicable law, Cisco shall provide You with the interface information needed to achieve interoperability between the Software and another independently created program. Cisco will provide this interface information at Your written request after you pay Cisco’s licensing fees (if any). You will keep this information in strict confidence and strictly follow any applicable terms and conditions upon which Cisco makes such information available.

  • NIST Cybersecurity Framework The U.S. Department of Commerce National Institute for Standards and Technology Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity Version 1.1.

  • Proposed Policies and Procedures Regarding New Online Content and Functionality By February 1, 2017, the Division will submit to OCR for its review and approval proposed policies and procedures (“the Plan for New Content”) to ensure that all new, newly-added, or modified online content and functionality will be accessible to people with disabilities as measured by conformance to the Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility set forth above, except where doing so would impose a fundamental alteration or undue burden. a) When fundamental alteration or undue burden defenses apply, the Plan for New Content will require the Division to provide equally effective alternative access. The Plan for New Content will require the Division, in providing equally effective alternate access, to take any actions that do not result in a fundamental alteration or undue financial and administrative burdens, but nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the same benefits or services as their nondisabled peers. To provide equally effective alternate access, alternatives are not required to produce the identical result or level of achievement for persons with and without disabilities, but must afford persons with disabilities equal opportunity to obtain the same result, to gain the same benefit, or to reach the same level of achievement, in the most integrated setting appropriate to the person’s needs. b) The Plan for New Content must include sufficient quality assurance procedures, backed by adequate personnel and financial resources, for full implementation. This provision also applies to the Division online content and functionality developed by, maintained by, or offered through a third-party vendor or by using open sources. c) Within thirty (30) days of receiving OCR’s approval of the Plan for New Content, the Division will officially adopt and fully implement the amended policies and procedures.