Scenario Analysis Sample Clauses

The Scenario Analysis clause outlines a process for evaluating the potential impacts of various hypothetical events or changes on the agreement or project. Typically, this involves identifying key variables or risks and modeling how different scenarios—such as market fluctuations, regulatory changes, or operational disruptions—could affect outcomes. By systematically assessing these possibilities, the clause helps parties anticipate challenges, make informed decisions, and allocate resources or responsibilities more effectively, ultimately reducing uncertainty and supporting better risk management.
Scenario Analysis. Three groups of scenarios were devised for the purpose of evaluating the performance and capability of FLSWM. The first group involves three future development scenarios to assess the sensitivity of FLSWM with respect to prediction of long distance travel within the state. The second group involves a typical highway project in a rural county to demonstrate how FLSWM can be used for counties not covered by regional travel demand models. The third group examines the potential for FLSWM to be used for forecasting the traffic impacts of ACES vehicle adoption.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Scenario Analysis. If Counterparty is not a Regulated Swap Entity, prior to any Swap Transaction Event with respect to any Swap that is not “available for trading” (as such term is defined in CFTC Regulations) on a DCM or SEF, Counterparty can request, and consult on the design of, a scenario analysis to allow Counterparty to assess its potential exposure in connection with such Swap.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Scenario Analysis. This entails the use of varying interest rate scenarios (increasing, decreasing, stable, etc.) to see how the total return projections are affected. A one-year holding period will be the normal time frame used in this type of analysis.
View Source
Scenario Analysis. This section puts an effort to illustrate how the ridership analysis can provide inputs to transit service planning, through comparing the cost and revenue for different scenarios. From a general point of view, transit project costs include capital (fixed) costs and operational/maintenance (variable) costs. Capital costs mainly covers the infrastructure, e.g. buses, stations, stops, buildings, and rolling stock, etc. Variable costs are comprised by driver wages, fuel costs, maintenance and operation, etc. The literature indicates several approaches to estimate variable costs. The methods either focus on cost per unit of service revenue hours, service revenue miles, or a combination of both (FAMPO 2007, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 2008, TMSR 2009, AVTA 2012, APTA 2016, TCRP 78 2012). Literature shows that the average total cost per unite of service revenue hours ranges from $85 to $130 in different projects. Most of the literature agrees to a total cost per service revenue miles of $10-11. Some other methods use combinations of service revenue hours and miles. It is assumed that a portion of the variable costs, including driver salaries and wages, and fringe benefits, etc. are better estimated on an hourly basis while some other costs such as services, materials and supplies, fuel, utilities and liabilities are more accurately estimated thorough a mileage basis. Table 6 below presents the detailed estimates of different types of costs that was applied in this analysis.
View Source
Scenario Analysis. Problem Solution (i) Asset quality questionable – possibility of default becomes a concern Remove questionable asset from portfolio. (ii) Portfolio rate falls below indicated rate Honor target rate indicated. Reduce target returns for new customers. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇’ah Supervisory Board. (iii) Portfolio size is not sufficient to cover total nominal value of deposits Either (a) allocate sufficient assets to portfolio; or (b) do not renew maturing Wakalah deposits. The proposed operational process, subject to further development, is key element of making the unrestricted Wakalah as on-balance sheet product. The collective investment scheme may be taken as a reference.
View Source
Scenario Analysis. In order to evaluate the pros and cons of each scenario, it will be necessary to develop evaluation criteria. These criteria needs to evaluate the “what if” questions proposed and the project’s goals and objectives. The goals and objectives must also be converted to quantitative and qualitative measurements for evaluating each alternative. These measurements may include mobility measures, such as lane miles by level of service or congestion delay reductions; quality of life measures; efficiency criteria; accessibility; economic factors, such as infrastructure capital and maintenance costs; and others. LSA will develop a list of potential evaluation criteria and coordinate their definition and applicability with MPO staff and the Advisory Committee. A base model run will be conducted for each scenario to determine deficiencies and needs. Transportation solutions to address these needs will be developed for each scenario. Utilizing the traffic model’s performance report, a standardized report of key criteria such as VMT, hours of congestion, mobility access, fuel consumption and green house gas emissions will be reported for each alternative. Pros and Cons will be developed for each alternative in a Matrix form for presentation at the second round of public meetings – the Round Tables and the Public Officials Workshop.
View Source
Scenario Analysis. Prior to any Swap Transaction Event with respect to any Swap that is not “made available for trading” (as that phrase is used in the CFTC Regulations) on a designated contract market or swap execution facility, Party B may request, and consult on the design of, a scenario analysis to allow Party B to assess its potential exposure in connection with such Swap. Upon such request by Party B (which if made orally will be confirmed by Party B in a written notice given to Party A in accordance with the Notice Procedures), Party A will provide to Party B a scenario analysis, which will be designed in consultation with Party B and done over a range of assumptions, including severe downside stress scenarios that would result in a significant loss. Party A will disclose all material assumptions and explain the calculation methodologies used to perform the requested scenario analysis; provided, however, that Party A is not required to disclose confidential, proprietary information about any model it may use to prepare such scenario analysis. In designing any requested scenario analysis, Party A will consider any relevant analysis that it undertakes for its own risk management purposes. Unless Party B makes a request for a scenario analysis prior to a Swap Transaction Event, Party B shall not be entitled to any scenario analysis with respect to such Swap Transaction Event unless Party A otherwise agrees.
View Source
Scenario Analysis landfill
View Source

Related to Scenario Analysis

  • Risk Analysis The Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to Securities Depositories operating in the countries listed in Appendix B. If the Custodian is unable to provide a Risk Analysis with respect to a particular Securities Depository, it will notify the Fund. If a new Securities Depository commences operation in one of the Appendix B countries, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis in a reasonably practicable time after such Securities Depository becomes operational. If a new country is added to Appendix B, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to each Securities Depository in that country within a reasonably practicable time after the addition of the country to Appendix B.

  • Quantitative Analysis Quantitative analysts develop and apply financial models designed to enable equity portfolio managers and fundamental analysts to screen potential and current investments, assess relative risk and enhance performance relative to benchmarks and peers. To the extent that such services are to be provided with respect to any Account which is a registered investment company, Categories 3, 4 and 5 above shall be treated as “investment advisory services” for purposes of Section 5(b) of the Agreement.”

  • Sampling and Analysis The sampling and analysis of the coal delivered hereunder shall be performed by Buyer upon delivery of the coal to Buyer’s facility, and the results thereof shall be accepted and used as defining the quality and characteristics of the coal delivered under this Agreement and as the Payment Analysis. All analyses shall be made in Buyer’s laboratory at Buyer’s expense in accordance with ASTM standards where applicable, or industry-accepted standards in other cases. Samples for analyses shall be taken in accordance with ASTM standards or other methods mutually acceptable to both parties. Seller shall transmit its “as loaded” quality analysis to Buyer as soon as possible. Seller’s “as-loaded” quality shall be the Payment Analysis only when Buyer’s sampler and/or scales are inoperable, or if Buyer fails to obtain a sample upon unloading. Seller represents that it is familiar with Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices, and that it finds them to be acceptable. Buyer shall notify Seller in writing of any significant changes in Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices. Any such changes in Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices shall, except for ASTM or industry-accepted changes in practices, provide for no less accuracy than the sampling and analysis practices existing at the tune of the execution of this Agreement, unless the Parties otherwise mutually agree. Each sample taken by Buyer shall be divided into four (4) parts and put into airtight containers, properly labeled and sealed. One (1) part shall be used for analysis by Buyer. One (1) part shall be used by Buyer as a check sample, if Buyer in its sole judgment determines it is necessary. One (1) part shall be retained by Buyer until thirty (30) days after the sample is taken (“Disposal Date”), and shall be delivered to Seller for analysis if Seller so requests before the Disposal Date. One (1) part (the “Referee Sample”) shall be retained by Buyer until the Disposal Date. Seller shall be given copies of all analyses made by Buyer by the fifth (5th) business day of the month following the month of unloading. In addition, Buyer shall send Seller weekly analyses of coal unloaded at Buyer’s facilities. Seller, on reasonable notice to Buyer, shall have the right to have a representative present to observe the sampling and analyses performed by Buyer. Unless Seller requests an analysis of the Referee Sample before the Disposal Date, Buyer’s analysis shall be used to determine the quality of the coal delivered hereunder and shall be the Payment Analysis. The Monthly Weighted Averages of specifications referenced in §6.1 shall be based on the individual Shipment analyses. If any dispute arises with regard to the analysis of any sample before the Disposal Date for such sample, the Referee Sample retained by Buyer shall be submitted for analysis to an independent commercial testing laboratory (“Independent Lab”) mutually chosen by Buyer and Seller. For each coal quality specification in question, if the analysis of the Independent Lab differs by more than the applicable ASTM reproducibility standards, the Independent Lab results will govern, and the prior analysis shall be disregarded. All testing of the Referee Sample by the Independent Lab shall be at requestor’s expense unless the Independent Lab results differ from the original Payment Analysis for any specification by more than the applicable ASTM reproducibility standards as to that specification. In such case, the cost of the analysis made by the Independent Lab shall be borne by the party who provided the original Payment Analysis.

  • Escrow Analysis If applicable, with respect to each Mortgage Loan, the Seller has within the last twelve months (unless such Mortgage was originated within such twelve month period) analyzed the required Escrow Payments for each Mortgage and adjusted the amount of such payments so that, assuming all required payments are timely made, any deficiency will be eliminated on or before the first anniversary of such analysis, or any overage will be refunded to the Mortgagor, in accordance with RESPA and any other applicable law;

  • Independent Analysis Each Party hereby confirms that its decision to execute this Agreement has been based upon its independent assessment of documents and information available to it, as it has deemed appropriate.