Scenario 4. Full consolidation of the current Secretariat team and establishment of a Compliance Programme + 47,32 % / Scenario 3 Zero real growth + 50 % Coordinator of the African Initiative (P-2 in 2022; upgrade as of 2023) + 30% Programme Management Assistant to the African Initiative (G-5) + 100 % Coordinator of Single Species Action Plans (P-3) + 50 % Information Assistant (G-5) + 20 % Programme Management Assistant SICU (G-5) + 100 % Compliance Officer (P-3) + 100 % Technical Committee Support Officer (P-2) + upgrade of the Executive Secretary (P-5) + upgrade of the Head of SICU (P-4) + upgrade of the Executive Management Support Officer (P-3) + upgrade of the Information Officer (P-3) Scenario 4 foresees an increase of 47,32 % compared to Scenario 3. The rationale behind this scenario is to reflect the actual full need of the Secretariat in terms of staff capacity in order to be able to follow up on all mandatory tasks under the Agreement and MOP Resolutions. In this respect it is suggested to integrate all current Secretariat posts in the core budget to maintain its current capacity at the actual level of staff members’ post occupancies, which also implies the upgrade of five posts in order to meet the UN rules and regulations. In addition, this scenario foresees the establishment of a Compliance Programme with integration of a full- time post within the Secretariat to deliver on such programme and improve the overall implementation rate throughout the Agreement area. Finally, it suggests the establishment of a post of Technical Committee Support Officer to support the Science, Implementation and Compliance Unit, which is facing a constantly increasing amount of work.
Scenario 4 ransomware attack This scenario is based in the WannaCry ransomware campaign in May of 2017, a global cyberattack that have a huge impact in many sectors, including railway, where the German Infrastructure Manager Deutsche Bahn was hit by the ransomware and some screens at train stations showed the ransomware message demanding money.
Scenario 4 a < c < d < b, it is noted in the scenario that a + d < b + c. The combined domain is shown in Figure F. Figure F The combined domain of X1, X2 From the situation, (1 + 2 ≤ ), the distribution function of X1 + X2 can be derived based on five possible cases as follows: Case 1: ≤ + Case 2: + ≤ ≤ + Case 3: + ≤ ≤ + Case 4: + ≤ ≤ + Case 5: ≥ + Hence, the summary of the distribution of X is shown as follows: Probability density function (when a + d ≤ b + c): () = 0 , ≤ + − ( + ) ( − )( − ) , + ≤ ≤ + ( − ) , + ≤ ≤ + − + ( + ) ( − )( − ) , + ≤ ≤ + Cumulative distribution function (when a + d ≤ b + c): () = 2 − 2( + ) + ( + )2 2( − )( − ) , + ≤ ≤ + 2( − ) + (2 − 2 − 2( − )) 2( − )( − ) , + ≤ ≤ + −2 + 2( + ) − (2 + 2 + 2( + − )) 2( − )( − ) , + ≤ ≤ + { 1 , ≥ + Under this case, the expectation can be derived as follows: [] = [1 + 2] = [1] + [2] =
Scenario 4. Open Data lifecycle: maximizing OGD benefits A Ministry of Health fulfills many duties in which they work with data - the keep the health records of citizens, sanction pharmaceutical products to be used in the country, keep track of receipts, manage budget and expenses of hospitals and so on. In this scenario, with the introduction of the new Freedom of Information Act, the Ministry is now required by law to release Open Governmental Data – something it has not done before (Figure 7). To grow up to this challenge, the Ministry is now working on identifying the skills and competencies they have to make sure their staff has. To maximize the value of their data and their work, they don’t only consider Open Data processes that happen in the Ministry, but also how they can support data use outside of their organization - directly or indirectly. The Ministry must identify skills and competencies on all stages of the Open Data lifecycle – creation/collection, preparation, publishing, and usage, collaboration and feedback by Open Data users.
Scenario 4. TCCA has not completed the certification process for a Canadian applicant and EASA validation is in progress. The procedure for continued validation is:
Scenario 4. In general, this scenario is a special scenario for demonstration high data traffic wireless channel for broadcasting with separating broadcasting hub and event location can be facilitated using either direct connection or multi-hops depending on required data rate. Fig. 13: 2D map of Berlin Scenario 4- special use case The Scenario 4 is designed for the case of high data transportation between Olympic stadium and Berlin-Messe, where broadcasting centre is arranged in Berlin-Messe using exist glass fibre. In the meantime any cables are available at Olympic stadium even though events are held on the spot. Fig. 13 shows possible rays for connecting wireless channel between two sites, where red points are relay locations and green lines represent designed path for wireless channel, namely direct transmission with solid line, one hop with dashed line and two hops with dotted line. 3D map of Berlin Scenario 4 is also shown in Fig. 14. Fig. 14: 3D map of a part of Berlin Scenario 4
