Sampling Plan Sample Clauses

Sampling Plan. 3.1 Oxide thickness (section 4.1) should be measured on 20% of the lot to verify it is within spec.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Sampling Plan. 3.1 Inspect all of the wafers in the lot for Gross and Fine defects as defined in sections 4.1 and 4.2.
Sampling Plan. The Concessionaire shall initially utilize the City’s PADEP-approved sampling plan and sampling stations. A list of sampling stations is included as Exhibit F. The Concessionaire may modify the routine distribution system sampling plan as necessary, in accordance with applicable regulations, but any modifications to the sampling plan shall, at a minimum, maintain compliance with the PADEP-approved sampling plan. The sampling plan shall be reviewed annually or more frequently if required for regulatory compliance, and modified, if necessary, based on changes in regulation/law, water use patterns, or other changes that may affect water quality. The Concessionaire shall analyze data trends and develop an action plan to respond to changes in water quality. The Concessionaire shall report to the City any and all sample results that do not comply with the more stringent of regulatory requirements or these Operating Standards. Distribution system water quality sample reports to the City shall be made in accordance with PADEP public notification requirements for samples not in compliance with City or regulatory requirements. The Concessionaire shall identify issues, corrective action plans, and report on corrective actions in subsequent reports to the City until the issues are corrected. At the time of the closing, the City collects distribution system water quality samples each month for regulatory compliance using dedicated sample hydrants. The Concessionaire shall be responsible for maintenance, repair, and replacement, as necessary, of the sample hydrants. The Concessionaire should review the City’s sampling plan and incorporate the City’s plan into future operations.
Sampling Plan. DOE is proposing a sampling plan for determining input power, lumen output, CCT, and rated lifetime of an LED lamp. DOE reviewed the sampling requirements of other lamp technologies to develop the sampling plan for LED lamps. For testing LED sources, DOE reviewed the requirements specified in IES TM–21–2011 and identified that those requirements are necessary to project the rated lifetime. XXX proposes a minimum of 21 LED lamps should be tested for determining the input power, lumen output, and CCT as described in section III.B. A minimum of three lamps should be selected per month for seven months of production out of a 12 month period. If lamp production occurs in fewer than seven months of the year, three or more lamps should be selected for each month that production occurs as evenly as possible to meet the minimum 21 unit requirement. The seven months need not be consecutive and could be a combination of seven months out of the 12 months. Sample sizes greater than 21 should be multiples of three so that an equal number of lamps in each orientation are tested. This selection of a minimum of 21 lamps is consistent with DOE’s regulation for GSFLs and GSILs, specified at 10 CFR 429.27, Subpart B, which specify a sampling size of a minimum of three lamps for each month of production for a minimum of seven months (not necessarily consecutive) out of the 12 month period, totaling a minimum of 21 lamps. DOE further proposes that the input power, lumen output, and CCT of the units should be averaged and the value of each of these parameters should be rounded as specified in section III.B.5. The average value of each parameter should be calculated using the following equation: DOE proposes that the sample size for testing LED sources for determining the rated lifetime of LED lamps be as specified in section 4.2 of IES TM–21– 2011. This section recommends that all data from a sample set at a given case temperature and drive current from the LM–80–2008 test should be used for projecting the lifetime of the LED source. The recommended sample set is 20 units for projecting the lifetime of the LED sources. If at least 20 units are used, the lifetime could be projected up to six times the test duration, with a maximum limit of 25,000 hours as described in section III.C.7. If the number of units tested is between 10 and 19 units, the lifetime could be projected up to 5.5 times the test duration, with a maximum of 25,000 hours. Less than 10 units cannot be used for the...
Sampling Plan. Consultant shall use information obtained from site visits and prior CIP hazardous materials assessments for this investigation and develop a hazardous material sampling plan for representative areas and infrastructure within the identified process facilities.
Sampling Plan. Perform sampling inspection per ARP9013/2 unless otherwise stated on the purchase order.
Sampling Plan. The sampling used for this procedure is a single sampling plan as this is the most effective sampling plan to detect lots with a low level of defects. The sampling plan provided is for three types of defects: critical, majors and minors as defined under Section 11 of this procedure.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Sampling Plan. (Completed) The fourth year of Sampling at Xxxxxx Island and Sacramento was completed on 6/30/11. Xxxxxxxx proposed for Year 4 started in October of 2010. The same sampling plan was used both at Xxxxxx Island and Sacramento as in the previous 3 years . The sampling plan for year 3 of the project was implemented. (The same sampling plan was used in year 3 as was used in Year 1 and 2). Discussions on updating sampling plan for Year 2 were conducted and implemented. (Completed 11/08). Design Sampling Plan for year 1 (Completed 1/30/08) Task 2: Collect and Send DNA samples to Xxxxxxx Xxxxx at Oregon State University: (Completed) All samples have been collected and sent to the California Department of Fish and Game’s Tissue Archive Lab and then on to Xxxxxxx Xxxxx at Oregon State Univesity. Oregon State received the 2011 samples (n = 4374) from the tissue archive lab in two batches on 09/08/11 and 09/20/11. The fourth year of samples (aug 2010 – june 2011) were sent to the California Department of Fish and Game’s Tissue Archive Lab on 8/12/11 for splitting prior to sending to Oregon State. Approximately 4200 samples were collected during year 4. Aproximately 1833 samples from part of Year 3 (Jan 2010 to Aug 2010) were sent to the Archive Lab on 3/29/11. Samples from year 2 and some from Year 3 (July 2008 – Jan 2010) were sent to the DFG Archive lab for splitting and sent to Dr. Xxxxxxx Xxxxx at Oregon State on 7/12/10 for processing. Samples from year 2 (July 2008 to July 2009), included 817 tissue samples from Xxxxxx Island and 776 tissue samples from Sacramento. An additional 8 samples were collected between August 1,2009 and January 6,2010 and included samples from both Sacramento and Xxxxxx Island. samples collected from Year 1 were sent to the DFG Tissue Archive Lab where they were split and sent to Dr. Xxxxxxx Xxxxx at Oregon State University on 11/20/08. For Year 1, 472 samples were collected at Xxxxxx Island between November 2007 and July 2008 and an additional 291 samples were collected at Sacramento between March 2008 and June 2008. Only two samples were collected at Benicia on 2/12/08. Task 3: Analyze DNA Samples (Completed) On 6/6/12, the run assignments from the remaining 2011 samples from Sacramento were sent to the principal investigator. On 4/9/12 completed run assisgnments from the remaining Xxxxxx Island samples were sent to the principal investigator. Some samples from Xxxxxx Island in 2011 were unable to provide enough data to assign race (~...
Sampling Plan. 7 Soil and groundwater samples will be collected at predetermined locations based on 8 findings of the Phase I ESA and the judgment of experienced Cardno personnel. The 9 proposed soil boring and groundwater monitor well locations are illustrated on Figure 4.
Sampling Plan. Sampling Plans are IAW ANSI/Z1.4 or better unless otherwise approved by Supplier Quality Engineer. GENERAL VISION REQUIREMENTS Suppliers to have the following vision requirements: • All inspectors performing to this procedure shall successfully pass an annual eye exam by a medically qualified / trained person in accordance with ASQR-01 and the table below: • Intervals shall not exceed one year. • Individuals shall be tested in at least one eye, either corrected or uncorrected. • Color Perception testing is required one time only. Individuals shall be capable of adequately distinguishing and differentiating colors used in the method for which certification is required, the process being performed or inspection activity. Documentation shall be retained 11 years. • NDT Requirements Near-Vision Eye Examination requirements for persons performing Nital / Temper Etch shall be Xxxxxx type 2 – 20/30 or equivalent. For Inspectors certified to the requirements of NAS410 (NDT) or Mil-STD- 867 (Nital / Temper Etch), and for personnel performing visual inspection of welds, Supplier may administer their own eye examinations per the standard. Records shall be retained for each individual. Individual Performing Shall be compliant with minimum vision requirements of Visual Inspection (i.e., calibration, non-weld, in-process, layout, dimensional) Near Vision requirements of • Snellen 14/18, (20/30, or • Xxxxxx 2 Visual Inspections on Welds American Welding Society Standard (AWS) D17.1 Vision Inspections on Color FM-100 Hue Test FIRST ARICLE INSPECTION (FAI) The Supplier shall perform and document First Article Inspection in accordance with SAE AS9102 (latest revision in affect at time of Purchase Order placement). The Supplier shall perform FAI the first time the Supplier produces an item for MSP Aviation or if it has been greater than 24 months since the last production of that item or there is a change to the drawing for that item. All drawing notes and dimensions shall be verified. Inspection and measurement results shall be recorded, including actual measurements with location identified. The FAI test report, sample and material certifications for all raw materials and finishes (see Q4) shall be included with the shipment. The Supplier shall attach a removable tag to the part identifying it as the “First Article Sample”. Note: Tag or Identify part that the FAIR was performed on. Notes: § This requirement is not applicable to Commercial Off the Shelf parts. § (Applicable...
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.