Ride Through Clause Samples

Ride Through. Ride-Through requires that the resource continues to inject current within the "No Trip" zone of the voltage and frequency ride-through requirements. Unless approved during the Interconnection Requirements Study analysis, resources should not use "momentary cessation" within the ride-through regions for any of the ride-through requirements in this Attachment B (Facility Owned by Seller). In the "may trip" regions, the Facility shall initiate trip for over/under voltage and frequency conditions only as required for Facility equipment operating limits to avoid damage. Any such limits of operation should be conveyed to the Company and represented in the provided models.

Ride Through. Ride-Through requires that the resource continues to operate and inject current within the "No Trip" zone of the voltage and frequency ride-through requirements.

Ride Through. “[T]he trustee may abandon property of the estate that is burdensome to the estate or that is of inconsequential value and benefit to the estate.”91 Section 521 requires a debtor to file “a statement of his intention with respect to the retention or surrender of [secured] property,” and perform his intention with respect to such property “within 30 days after the first date set for the meeting of creditors under section 341(a).”92 Accordingly, if such abandonment occurs, the debtor has three options, pursuant to statute, with regard to the collateral: “ (i) surrender the property to the secured creditor, (ii) retain and redeem the property under section 722 by paying the secured creditor the full amount of the secured claim, . . . or (iii) retain the property and sign a reaffirmation agreement.”93 A fourth option, judicially-created, is to “retain the collateral and continue making loan payments in accordance with the original terms of the loan documents without a reaffirmation agreement.”94 This option is known as ride-through.95 This option is “not protected in the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the First, Fifth, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits, and the question is open in the Sixth and Eighth Circuits.”96 The BAPCPA amendments to Section 521(a)(2)(B) and additions of Section 521(a)(6) and Section 362(h) “attempt to halt the ‘ride-through’ option, and its language suggests that the debtor may not keep secured property without either reaffirming or redeeming the debt.”97 However, ride-through survived BAPCPA in two ways, according to ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇: first, by means of a reaffirmation agreement that is not approved, and second, by default.98 An example of the first way is the case In re ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.99 There, the debtor timely filed her statement of intent and timely entered into the reaffirmation agreement with the secured creditor of her vehicle.100 The court did not find the reaffirmation agreement to be in the debtor’s best interest, but because the debtor had complied with §§ 521(a)(2) and (6), § 521(d), and 362(h), the debtor did not have to surrender possession of the vehicle.101 In a similar case, In re Moustafi, the Court held that a debtor’s vehicle reaffirmation agreement was not in the debtor’s best interest, because her expenses exceeded her income.102 There, the debtor complied with §§ 521(a)(2) and 362(h)(1) by filing her Statement of Intention and executing and filing the reaffirmation agreement.103 Despite disapproving the reaffirmation agreement, the Cou...