Reunification Sample Clauses
Reunification. 1. At least 76.2% of children discharged from custody and reunified with their parents or caretakers in the last year shall have been reunified within 12 months of the latest removal from home.
2. At least 30% of children who are discharged from custody and reunified with their parents or caretakers in the last year shall be reunified within 12 months of the latest removal from home.
3. At least 60% of children who are discharged from custody and reunified with their parents or caretakers in the last year shall be reunified within 12 months of the latest removal from home.
4. At least 70% of children who are discharged from custody and reunified with their parents or caretakers in the last year shall be reunified within 12 months of the latest removal from home.
Reunification. The goal of reunification is to safely reunify the child to the home of the parent or legal guardian. Reunification is the preferred goal in all cases unless the court finds that aggravated circumstances exist.
Reunification. The child[ren] should be returned to the parent(s);
Reunification. Any of the mother’s children exited ▇▇▇▇▇▇ care by being reunified with their mother/primary caregivers.
Reunification. The positive conclusion of providing care and guidance to children in CFSA custody whereby they are reunited with their family or legal guardian. The case is no longer open with the court; however, in cases where the child/youth is reunified under protective supervision of the court, monitoring of the case continues for a defined period while the child/youth remains in the home.
Reunification. Semi-Annual Reunification Performance, 2005 – 2016 (Children who returned home to their families)
Reunification. A plan unifying children and their families throughout a disaster: Developing and implementing plans, procedures, and backup plans that include ways to globally communicate with children and staff’s family and community agencies before, during, and after an emergency.
Reunification. The Agreement contains provisions for German reunification. Two were especially important. Reunification would extend the Agreement’s principles to private debtors in East Germany; that is, individuals and firms located there would be expected to make their own repayments. The specifics would be adjusted to take account of any loss of property in the east. In addition, the Agreement deferred payment of interest arrears on some pre-war loans until reunification. These so-called ‘Schattenquoten’ (‘shadow shares’) reduced the debt-service implied by the LDA, and finessed the political point that the Federal Republic did not control all German territory. The ‘Schattenquoten’ were formed out of interest arrears on the ▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇ loans, money borrowed by a much larger ‘▇▇▇▇▇’, and applied in a different way to loans to Prussia, which no longer existed and whose former territory accounted for not much more than half of the Federal Republic as of 1953.55 This provision also provided a safe way of conditioning German payments on her ability to repay. Reunification might have seemed remote or even impossible in 1953.56 In any case, few predicted then that reunification would occur as it did, with a nearly bankrupt East Germany being taken over by the West. The Agreement contemplated a situation where reunification meant that Germany could afford to pay more, not less.57 A more natural procedure might have been to calculate the fraction of Germany’s potential GDP that was lost because of the division of the country, and to delay repay- ment of that much of the debt until reunification. The German delegation to the ▇▇▇- ▇▇▇ conference actually produced a set of calculations intended to show the reduction in Germany’s ability to pay due to loss of territory and resources. These estimates im- ply a debt reduction of between 40 and 50 percent, approximately the outcome of the London conference.58 There were reasons to doubt such calculations, and in any case 54 Ibid., p. 147. 55 Article 25 of the Agreement lays out the actions triggered by reunification. The Agreement describes these provisions in Annex I. For the ▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇ Loans, this was interest due 1945–1952; for Prussian loans, from 1937–1952. 56 In March of 1952, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ sent word that he was open to discussing a unified, neutral Germany. Historians have ever since debated whether this constituted a sincere offer or ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ effort to prevent West German re-armament and participation in NATO. See the arti...
