Common use of Results Presentation Clause in Contracts

Results Presentation. ‌ The results presentation is the result of two scripts, the ranking script is responsible for producing the raw ranking data and the graph that will be displayed (in png format). The output script is responsible for producing a static html file including the png graph and extracting the details of the ranked designs for a table, the results of which are shown in Figure 11. The page contains the information that would allow the user to determine which are the best designs, but while the graph highlights the best designs with different coloured points and the table lists all designs with their rank number, it is still a manual process to link the points on the graph with the rows in the table. It also does not lend itself to the identification of trends by, for example, highlighting all designs with a particular value of a design parameter. The page also presents all design results, even those with the very high default values when an objective could not be computed, on the same graph, this has the effect of distorting the results such that the real spread of results become obscured. The plans for Year 3 include making the page more dynamic to help identify trends and the position of results in objective space and also to filter the simulation results into the acceptable results, those that were evaluated but did not meet the objective constraints and those that could not be evaluated for some reason. Additionally to this, since DSE simulations are not run with either 3D or live stream output, it is desirable if a user will be able to relaunch a simulation from the results such that the simulated behaviour may be observed using these other features.

Results Presentation. ‌ The results presentation is the result of two scripts, the ranking script is responsible for producing the raw ranking data and the graph that will be displayed (in png format). The output script is responsible for producing a static html file le including the png graph and extracting the details of the ranked designs for a table, the results of which are shown in Figure 1115. The page contains the information that would allow the user to determine which are the best designs, but while the graph highlights the best designs with different di erent coloured points and the table lists all designs with their rank number, it is still a manual process to link the points on the graph with the rows in the table. It also does not lend itself to the identification identi cation of trends by, for example, highlighting all designs with a particular value of a design parameter. The page also presents all design results, even those with the very high default values when an objective could not be computed, on the same graph, this has the effect e ect of distorting the results such that the real spread of results become obscured. The plans for Year 3 include making the page more dynamic to help identify trends and the position of results in objective space and also to filter lter the simulation results into the acceptable results, those that were evaluated but did not meet the objective constraints and those that could not be evaluated for some reason. Additionally to this, since DSE simulations are not run with either 3D or live stream output, it is desirable if a user will be able to relaunch a simulation from the results such that the simulated behaviour may be observed using these other features.